Do Seungjae, Seo Min-Seock
Department of Conservative Dentistry, Wonkwang University Daejeon Dental Hospital, Daejeon, Korea.
Restor Dent Endod. 2021 Jan 26;46(1):e12. doi: 10.5395/rde.2021.46.e12. eCollection 2021 Feb.
The present study aims to compare the obturation quality of 2 confluence confirmation techniques in artificial maxillary first premolars showing Vertucci type II root canal configuration.
Thirty artificial maxillary premolars having Vertucci type II root canal configuration were made. They were divided into 3 groups according to the confluence confirmation technique as follows. Gutta-percha indentation (GPI) group (confluence confirmation using a gutta-percha cone and a K file); electronic apex locator (EAL) group (confluence confirmation using K files and EAL); and no confluence detection (NCD) group. In the GPI group and the EAL group, shaping and obturation were performed with the modified working length (WL). In the NCD group, shaping was performed without WL adjustment and obturation was carried out with an adjusted master cone. Micro-computed tomography was used before preparation and after obturation to calculate the percentage of gutta-percha occupied volume (%GPv) and the volume increase in the apical 4 mm. Data were analyzed using 1-way analysis of variance and Tukey's test.
Statistically significant difference was not found in terms of the %GPv from the apex to apical 4 mm. However, the NCD group showed a statistically significant volume increase compared with the EAL group ( < 0.05).
In terms of gutta-percha occupied volume, no significant difference was observed among the 3 groups. Confluence confirmation using an EAL in teeth with Vertucci type II configuration showed less volume increase during canal shaping compared with no confluence confirmation.
本研究旨在比较两种汇合确认技术在呈现Vertucci II型根管形态的人工上颌第一前磨牙中的充填质量。
制作了30颗具有Vertucci II型根管形态的人工上颌前磨牙。根据汇合确认技术将它们分为3组,具体如下。牙胶尖压痕(GPI)组(使用牙胶尖和K锉进行汇合确认);电子根尖定位仪(EAL)组(使用K锉和EAL进行汇合确认);以及无汇合检测(NCD)组。在GPI组和EAL组中,采用改良工作长度(WL)进行根管预备和充填。在NCD组中,根管预备时不调整WL,使用调整后的主尖锉进行充填。在预备前和充填后使用微计算机断层扫描来计算牙胶所占体积百分比(%GPv)以及根尖4mm处的体积增加量。数据采用单因素方差分析和Tukey检验进行分析。
从根尖到根尖4mm处的%GPv方面未发现统计学上的显著差异。然而,NCD组与EAL组相比显示出统计学上显著的体积增加(<0.05)。
在牙胶所占体积方面,3组之间未观察到显著差异。与无汇合确认相比,在具有Vertucci II型形态的牙齿中使用EAL进行汇合确认在根管预备过程中显示出更小的体积增加。