Kim Sohee, Kim Sunil, Park Jeong-Won, Jung Il-Young, Shin Su-Jung
Department of Conservative Dentistry, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, Gangnam Severance Hospital, 211 Eonjuro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 135-720, Korea.
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Oral Science Research Center, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, 50 Yonsei-ro, Shinchon-dong, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 120-752, Korea.
Materials (Basel). 2017 Oct 12;10(10):1170. doi: 10.3390/ma10101170.
This study evaluated the root-filling quality of a calcium silicate-based sealer and gutta percha (GP) cones by measuring the percentage of voids. Twenty artificial molar teeth were divided into two groups: one obturated using the single-cone (SC) technique, and the other using the continuous wave (CW) technique. Obturation was performed with GP cones and Endoseal MTA (mineral trioxide aggregate, Maruchi, Wonju, Korea). Obturated teeth were scanned using microcomputed tomography, and the percentage of void volume was calculated in the apical and coronal areas. A linear mixed model was used to determine the differences between the two techniques (p < 0.05). The percentage of voids between the filling materials and root canal walls was not significantly different between the two obturation methods (p > 0.05), except for the CW group, which demonstrated a significantly higher void volume in the coronal area of the distal canal (p < 0.05). The percentage of voids inside the filling material was significantly higher in the CW groups for all of the comparisons (p < 0.05), except in the apical area of the distal canal (p > 0.05). The voids between the filling material and canal wall in the apical area were not significantly different between the two techniques.
本研究通过测量空隙百分比来评估硅酸钙基封闭剂和牙胶尖(GP)的根管充填质量。将20颗人工磨牙分为两组:一组采用单尖(SC)技术进行充填,另一组采用连续波(CW)技术进行充填。使用牙胶尖和Endoseal MTA(矿物三氧化物凝聚体,韩国Maruchi公司,原州)进行充填。对充填后的牙齿进行微计算机断层扫描,并计算根尖区和冠方区域的空隙体积百分比。采用线性混合模型确定两种技术之间的差异(p<0.05)。两种充填方法之间,充填材料与根管壁之间的空隙百分比无显著差异(p>0.05),但连续波组在远中根管冠方区域的空隙体积显著更高(p<0.05)。除远中根管根尖区外(p>0.05),连续波组在所有比较中充填材料内部的空隙百分比均显著更高(p<0.05)。两种技术在根尖区充填材料与根管壁之间的空隙无显著差异。