Arranz-Solís David, Carvalheiro Cristina G, Zhang Elizabeth R, Grigg Michael E, Saeij Jeroen P J
Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology Department, Veterinary Medicine School 3A, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases, Molecular Parasitology Section, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021 Feb 19;11:621738. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.621738. eCollection 2021.
The severity of toxoplasmosis depends on a combination of host and parasite factors. Among them, the strain causing the infection is an important determinant of the disease outcome. Type 2 strains dominate in Europe, whereas in North America type 2, followed by type 3 and 12 strains are commonly isolated from wildlife and patients. To identify the strain type a person is infected with, serological typing provides a promising alternative to the often risky and not always possible biopsy-based DNA methods of genotyping. However, despite recent advances in serotyping, improvements in the sensitivity and specificity are still needed, and it does not yet discriminate among the major lineages infecting people. Moreover, since infections caused by non-1/2/3 strains have been associated with more severe disease, the ability to identify these is critical. In the present study we investigated the diagnostic potential of an ELISA-based assay using 28 immunogenic peptides derived from a recent large-scale peptide array screen. Our results show that a discrete number of peptides, derived from dense granule proteins (GRA3, GRA5, GRA6, and GRA7) was sufficient to discriminate among archetypal strains that infect mice and humans. The assay specifically relies on ratios that compare individual serum reactivities against GRA-specific polymorphic peptide variants in order to determine a "reactivity fingerprint" for each of the major strains. Importantly, nonarchetypal strains that possess a unique combination of alleles, different from types 1/2/3, showed either a non-reactive, or different combinatorial, mixed serum reactivity signature that was diagnostic in its own right, and that can be used to identify these strains. Of note, we identified a distinct "HG11/12" reactivity pattern using the GRA6 peptides that is able to distinguish HG11/12 from archetypal North American/European strain infections.
弓形虫病的严重程度取决于宿主和寄生虫因素的综合作用。其中,引起感染的菌株是疾病结局的重要决定因素。2型菌株在欧洲占主导地位,而在北美,2型菌株之后,3型和12型菌株通常从野生动物和患者中分离出来。为了确定一个人感染的菌株类型,血清学分型为通常有风险且并非总是可行的基于活检的基因分型DNA方法提供了一种有前景的替代方法。然而,尽管血清学分型最近取得了进展,但仍需要提高其敏感性和特异性,并且它尚未区分感染人类的主要谱系。此外,由于非1/2/3型菌株引起的感染与更严重的疾病有关,识别这些菌株的能力至关重要。在本研究中,我们研究了一种基于ELISA的检测方法的诊断潜力,该方法使用了来自最近大规模肽阵列筛选的28种免疫原性肽。我们的结果表明,来自致密颗粒蛋白(GRA3、GRA5、GRA6和GRA7)的数量有限的肽足以区分感染小鼠和人类的原型菌株。该检测方法特别依赖于比较个体血清对GRA特异性多态性肽变体的反应性的比率,以便为每种主要菌株确定一个“反应性指纹”。重要的是,具有不同于1/2/3型的独特等位基因组合的非原型菌株显示出无反应性或不同的组合混合血清反应性特征,这本身就具有诊断价值,可用于识别这些菌株。值得注意的是,我们使用GRA6肽鉴定出一种独特的“HG11/12”反应性模式,能够将HG11/12与北美/欧洲原型菌株感染区分开来。