Suppr超能文献

使用临床虚弱量表评估虚弱对创伤结局的影响。

The impact of frailty on trauma outcomes using the Clinical Frailty Scale.

机构信息

East Midlands Major Trauma Centre, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals Trust, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, England, UK.

Royal Derby Hospital, Derby, England, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Apr;48(2):1271-1276. doi: 10.1007/s00068-021-01627-x. Epub 2021 Mar 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Population ageing is a worldwide phenomenon; thanks to improvements in medical care and living standards. The Office of National Statistics in the UK predicts that the fastest growing age group in coming decades will be those over 85 years. This is reflected in Trauma Audit and Research Network data, which has highlighted a shift in caseload from a majority of young males to elderly patients at UK Major Trauma Centres (MTC). This study of elderly trauma patients admitted to a UK MTC reviews the links between frailty, using the Canadian Study of Health and Aging Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), and outcomes from trauma.

METHODS

A retrospective database review of patients > 65 years old admitted to our MTC was performed. We identified 1125 eligible patients of which 729 had a recorded CFS. Those without a CFS were omitted. The primary outcome measured was in-hospital mortality. Secondary measures were Injury Severity Score, length of stay, trauma team activation on arrival and discharge destination. Multivariate regression analyses were performed using STATA v 15.

RESULTS

Those of CFS 5-9 (frail) were 2.6 times more likely to die than the CFS 1-4 (pre-frail) (OR 2.65, 95% CI 1.47-4.78). The frail group was also 56% less likely to have a trauma call on admission (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.30-0.65) and 61% less likely to be discharged to their usual place of residence (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.28-0.55).

CONCLUSION

We advocate the use of the Clinical Frailty Scale as a screening tool for frailty in trauma patients, highlighting those at risk of increased length of stay and mortality, subsequently assisting healthcare providers with setting realistic expectations with family members.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, prognostic and epidemiological.

摘要

背景

人口老龄化是一个全球性现象;这要归功于医疗保健和生活水平的提高。英国国家统计局预测,未来几十年增长最快的年龄组将是 85 岁以上的人群。这反映在创伤审核和研究网络的数据中,该数据强调了英国主要创伤中心(MTC)的病例数量从以年轻男性为主转变为老年患者。本研究对入住英国 MTC 的老年创伤患者进行了回顾性数据库研究,探讨了使用加拿大健康与老龄化研究临床虚弱量表(CFS)评估的虚弱与创伤结果之间的关系。

方法

对入住我们 MTC 的年龄大于 65 岁的患者进行了回顾性数据库研究。我们确定了 1125 名符合条件的患者,其中 729 名患者记录了 CFS。没有 CFS 的患者被排除在外。主要测量的结果是院内死亡率。次要测量指标为损伤严重程度评分、住院时间、到达时创伤小组的激活情况和出院去向。使用 STATA v 15 进行多变量回归分析。

结果

CFS 5-9(虚弱)患者的死亡风险是 CFS 1-4(虚弱前期)患者的 2.6 倍(OR 2.65,95%CI 1.47-4.78)。虚弱组入院时创伤呼叫的可能性也降低了 56%(OR 0.44,95%CI 0.30-0.65),出院到其常住地的可能性降低了 61%(OR 0.39,95%CI 0.28-0.55)。

结论

我们主张使用临床虚弱量表作为创伤患者虚弱的筛查工具,突出那些有延长住院时间和死亡风险的患者,从而帮助医疗保健提供者与家属一起设定切合实际的期望。

证据水平

III 级,预后和流行病学。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/353a/7937544/f2600e5d3d45/68_2021_1627_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验