Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
School of Dental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.
Int Endod J. 2021 Jul;54(7):1189-1199. doi: 10.1111/iej.13506. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
To develop an evidence-based, valid and reliable assessment tool that educational establishments and dental practitioners may use to assess the complexity of root canal treatment (RCT) utilizing digital advancements. The study also aimed to provide a more objective definition of the term 'uncomplicated' root canal treatment as described by the Association for Dental Education in Europe (ADEE) and the European Society of Endodontology (ESE) undergraduate curriculum guidelines for Endodontology.
The development process involved a narrative review of the literature to identify the complexity factors associated with root canal treatment on permanent teeth; an iterative development and analysis process to assess the weighting of these factors; and the programming of digital software to enhance the efficiency and user interface of the assessment form. Validation of the tool was sought with a panel of 35 specialist endodontists to assess clinical scenarios and assess the consensus inter-examiner agreement with the outcomes provided by the E-CAT. The inter-user and intra-user reliability studies were conducted with 15 dentists to evaluate the same clinical cases and by repeating the experiment 9 months later. The ease of use of the form was also assessed.
The E-CAT was successfully developed with a total of 19 complexity criteria and hosted on a secure server under the domain of www.e-cat.uk. The tool provides a smart interactive filtering mechanism and automatic background calculation of the risk scores. Three levels of complexity were defined: class I (uncomplicated), class II (moderately complicated) and class III (highly complicated). The consensus of the panel of endodontists had excellent agreement with the outcome of the E-CAT. The inter-user and intra-user reliability was found to be 0.80 and 0.90, respectively. The average time to assess a case was 1:36 min.
The E-CAT gave promising results providing an efficient and reliable platform to assess the complexity of cases undergoing root canal treatments. The study design allowed the formulation of a more objective definition to describe 'uncomplicated' root canal treatment as referred to by the ESE and ADEE guidelines. This study is advantageous for educational, public health and referral pathways.
开发一种基于证据、有效且可靠的评估工具,教育机构和牙医可以利用数字技术来评估根管治疗(RCT)的复杂性。本研究还旨在为欧洲牙科教育协会(ADEE)和欧洲牙髓病学会(ESE)的牙髓病学本科课程指南中描述的“简单”根管治疗提供更客观的定义。
该研究过程包括对文献进行叙述性综述,以确定与恒牙根管治疗相关的复杂性因素;对这些因素进行迭代式的开发和分析,以评估其权重;并对数字软件进行编程,以提高评估表的效率和用户界面。通过 35 名牙髓病专家小组对临床病例进行评估,并利用 E-CAT 提供的结果评估共识间检验者一致性,对该工具进行验证。通过 15 名牙医对相同的临床病例进行评估,并在 9 个月后重复该实验,对该工具的用户间和用户内可靠性进行研究。同时还评估了该表的易用性。
成功开发了 E-CAT,总共有 19 项复杂性标准,托管在安全服务器上,网址为 www.e-cat.uk。该工具提供了一个智能交互筛选机制和自动背景计算风险评分。定义了三个复杂性级别:I 级(简单)、II 级(中度复杂)和 III 级(高度复杂)。牙髓病专家小组的共识与 E-CAT 的结果具有极好的一致性。用户间和用户内可靠性分别为 0.80 和 0.90。评估一个病例的平均时间为 1:36 分钟。
E-CAT 结果令人满意,为评估根管治疗病例的复杂性提供了一个高效、可靠的平台。该研究设计允许对“简单”根管治疗进行更客观的定义,这与 ESE 和 ADEE 指南中的定义一致。本研究有利于教育、公共卫生和转诊途径。