Center for Mind/Brain Sciences - CIMeC, University of Trento, Rovereto (TN), Italy.
Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;80(4):1401-1411. doi: 10.3233/JAD-201210.
Severe socio-emotional impairments characterize the behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD). However, literature reports social cognition disorders in other dementias.
In this study, we investigated the accuracy of social cognition performances in the early and differential diagnosis of bvFTD.
We included 131 subjects: 32 bvFTD, 26 Alzheimer's disease (AD), 16 primary progressive aphasia (PPA), 17 corticobasal syndrome (CBS), and 40 healthy control (HC). Each subject completed the Ekman 60 faces (Ek-60F) test assessing basic emotion recognition and the Story-based Empathy Task (SET) assessing attribution of intentions/emotions. A combined social measure (i.e., Emotion Recognition and Attribution (ERA) index) was calculated. One-way ANOVA has been used to compare performances among groups, while receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve tested measures ability to distinguish subjects with and without bvFTD.
Ek-60F and ERA index scores were significantly lower in bvFTD versus HC, AD, and PPA groups. ROC analyses significantly distinguished bvFTD from HC (AUC 0.82-0.92), with the Ek-60F test showing the highest performance, followed by the ERA index. These two social measures showed the best accuracy in detecting bvFTD from AD (AUC 0.78-0.74) and PPA (AUC 0.80-0.76). Investigated measures failed in detecting bvFTD from CBS.
Accuracy analyses support the advantage of using social cognition tests for bvFTD diagnosis. Short social battery may reduce uncertainties and improve disease identification in clinical settings. We recommend a revision of current clinical criteria considering neuropsychological deficits in emotion recognition and processing tasks as key cognitive markers of this neurodegenerative syndrome.
严重的社会情感障碍是额颞叶痴呆(bvFTD)的行为变异型的特征。然而,文献报道其他痴呆症也存在社会认知障碍。
本研究旨在探讨社会认知在 bvFTD 的早期诊断和鉴别诊断中的准确性。
我们纳入了 131 名受试者:32 名 bvFTD 患者、26 名阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者、16 名原发性进行性失语症(PPA)患者、17 名皮质基底节综合征(CBS)患者和 40 名健康对照(HC)。每位受试者均完成了 Ekman 60 张面孔测试(Ek-60F)评估基本情绪识别和基于故事的同理心任务(SET)评估意图/情绪归因。计算了综合社会措施(即情感识别和归因(ERA)指数)。采用单因素方差分析比较各组间的表现,而接受者操作特征(ROC)曲线测试用于区分有和无 bvFTD 的受试者的能力。
与 HC、AD 和 PPA 组相比,bvFTD 患者的 Ek-60F 和 ERA 指数得分显著降低。ROC 分析显著区分了 bvFTD 与 HC(AUC 0.82-0.92),其中 Ek-60F 测试表现最佳,其次是 ERA 指数。这两个社会指标在检测 bvFTD 与 AD(AUC 0.78-0.74)和 PPA(AUC 0.80-0.76)方面具有最佳准确性。所研究的指标在检测 bvFTD 与 CBS 方面失败。
准确性分析支持使用社会认知测试来诊断 bvFTD。简短的社会测试组合可能会减少临床环境中的不确定性并提高疾病识别率。我们建议修订当前的临床标准,将情绪识别和处理任务中的神经心理学缺陷视为这种神经退行性综合征的关键认知标志物。