Programa de Pós-Graduação em Neurociências, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais (MG), Brazil.
Laboratório Interdisciplinar de Investigação Médica, Faculdade de Medicina, UFMG, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
J Alzheimers Dis. 2020;74(3):817-827. doi: 10.3233/JAD-190861.
Alzheimer's disease (AD) and behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) share cognitive and behavioral symptoms, such as apathy. Social cognition measurements are useful in distinguishing bvFTD from AD, but their accuracies may be affected by apathy.
To investigate whether social cognition measurements can distinguish bvFTD from either apathetic or non-apathetic AD patients.
Three groups of participants were enrolled in the present study: bvFTD (n = 22), AD (n = 20), and healthy controls (HC, n = 23). The AD group was divided into apathetic (n = 10) and non-apathetic (n = 10). All subjects underwent comprehensive neuropsychological examination, including the short version of the Social and Emotional Assessment (Mini-SEA), which comprises the facial emotion recognition test and the faux-pas recognition test (Faux-Pas Test). Apathy was assessed according to the Starkstein's Apathy (SA) Scale.
The bvFTD and AD groups did not differ on global cognitive efficiency and on executive functions. In comparison to the whole AD group, bvFTD displayed lower Faux-Pas Test and Mini-SEA scores. Both AD subgroups, apathetic or non-apathetic, exhibited similar performance on all social cognition measurements. In comparison to either apathetic AD or non-apathetic AD, bvFTD patients underperformed on the Faux-Pas Test and on the Mini-SEA. The area under the curve values for the Mini-SEA total score were 0.87 (bvFTD versus AD), 0.90 (bvFTD versus apathetic AD), and 0.83 (bvFTD versus non-apathetic AD).
Social cognition tests provide accurate distinction between bvFTD against either apathetic AD or non-apathetic AD. Social cognition measurements did not correlate with apathy severity.
阿尔茨海默病(AD)和行为变异额颞叶痴呆(bvFTD)具有认知和行为症状,如冷漠。社会认知测量有助于将 bvFTD 与 AD 区分开来,但它们的准确性可能会受到冷漠的影响。
研究社会认知测量是否可以将 bvFTD 与冷漠或非冷漠 AD 患者区分开来。
本研究纳入了三组参与者:bvFTD(n = 22)、AD(n = 20)和健康对照组(HC,n = 23)。AD 组分为冷漠(n = 10)和非冷漠(n = 10)。所有受试者均接受了全面的神经心理学检查,包括社会和情感评估的简短版(Mini-SEA),其中包括面部情绪识别测试和 faux-pas 识别测试(Faux-Pas Test)。根据 Starkstein 的冷漠量表(SA)评估冷漠。
与 AD 组相比,bvFTD 组在整体认知效率和执行功能方面没有差异。与整个 AD 组相比,bvFTD 的 Faux-Pas Test 和 Mini-SEA 得分较低。冷漠或非冷漠的 AD 亚组在所有社会认知测量中表现相似。与冷漠 AD 或非冷漠 AD 相比,bvFTD 患者在 Faux-Pas Test 和 Mini-SEA 上的表现较差。Mini-SEA 总分的曲线下面积值分别为 0.87(bvFTD 与 AD)、0.90(bvFTD 与冷漠 AD)和 0.83(bvFTD 与非冷漠 AD)。
社会认知测试可准确区分 bvFTD 与冷漠或非冷漠 AD。社会认知测量与冷漠严重程度无关。