• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估商业口罩过滤层上空气传播微生物的存活率。

Evaluation of survival rates of airborne microorganisms on the filter layers of commercial face masks.

机构信息

Center for Environment, Health, and Welfare Research, Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST), Seoul, Korea.

Energy Environment Policy and Technology, Graduate School of Energy and Environment, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Indoor Air. 2021 Jul;31(4):1134-1143. doi: 10.1111/ina.12816. Epub 2021 Mar 8.

DOI:10.1111/ina.12816
PMID:33682971
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8251341/
Abstract

After the WHO designated COVID-19 a global pandemic, face masks have become a precious commodity worldwide. However, uncertainty remains around several details regarding face masks, including the potential for transmission of bioaerosols depending on the type of mask and secondary spread by face masks. Thus, understanding the interplay between face mask structure and harmful bioaerosols is essential for protecting public health. Here, we evaluated the microbial survival rate at each layer of commercial of filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) and surgical masks (SMs) using bacterial bioaerosols. The penetration efficiency of bacterial particles for FFRs was lower than that for SMs; however, the microbial survival rate for all tested masks was >13%, regardless of filtration performance. Most bacterial particles survived in the filter layer (44%-77%) (e.g., the core filtering layer); the outer layer also exhibited significant survival rates (18%-29%). Most notably, survival rates were determined for the inner layers (<1% for FFRs, 3%-16% for SMs), which are in contact with the respiratory tract. Our comparisons of the permeability and survival rate of bioaerosols in each layer will contribute to bioaerosol-face mask research, while also providing information to facilitate the establishment of a mask-reuse protocol.

摘要

世界卫生组织宣布 COVID-19 为全球大流行后,口罩在全球范围内成为了宝贵的商品。然而,关于口罩仍存在一些不确定因素,包括根据口罩类型生物气溶胶传播的可能性以及口罩的二次传播。因此,了解口罩结构与有害生物气溶胶之间的相互作用对于保护公众健康至关重要。在这里,我们使用细菌生物气溶胶评估了商业过滤式面罩呼吸器 (FFR) 和外科口罩 (SM) 每个层的微生物存活率。细菌颗粒对 FFR 的穿透效率低于 SM;然而,所有测试口罩的微生物存活率均>13%,无论过滤性能如何。大多数细菌颗粒存活在过滤层中(44%-77%)(例如,核心过滤层);外层也表现出显著的存活率(18%-29%)。值得注意的是,内层的存活率也有所确定(FFR 为<1%,SM 为 3%-16%),因为内层与呼吸道接触。我们对每个层中生物气溶胶的渗透性和存活率的比较将有助于生物气溶胶-口罩研究,同时也为制定口罩重复使用协议提供信息。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of survival rates of airborne microorganisms on the filter layers of commercial face masks.评估商业口罩过滤层上空气传播微生物的存活率。
Indoor Air. 2021 Jul;31(4):1134-1143. doi: 10.1111/ina.12816. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
2
Evaluation of filtration characteristics and microbial recovery rates of commercial filtering facepiece respirators against airborne bacterial particles.评价商用过滤式口罩对空气中细菌颗粒物的过滤特性和微生物回收率。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Sep 10;682:729-736. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.153. Epub 2019 May 16.
3
Comparison of Fit for Sealed and Loose-Fitting Surgical Masks and N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirators.密合型与开放型手术口罩和 N95 过滤式防护口罩的适配性比较。
Ann Work Expo Health. 2021 May 3;65(4):463-474. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxaa125.
4
A quantitative assessment of the total inward leakage of NaCl aerosol representing submicron-size bioaerosol through N95 filtering facepiece respirators and surgical masks.对代表亚微米级生物气溶胶的氯化钠气溶胶通过N95过滤式面罩呼吸器和外科口罩的总向内泄漏量进行定量评估。
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2014;11(6):388-96. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2013.866715.
5
Nanoparticle penetration through filter media and leakage through face seal interface of N95 filtering facepiece respirators.纳米颗粒穿透N95过滤式面罩呼吸器的过滤介质及通过面罩密封接口的泄漏情况。
Ann Occup Hyg. 2012 Jul;56(5):568-80. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mer122. Epub 2012 Jan 31.
6
Respiratory source control using surgical masks with nanofiber media.使用带有纳米纤维介质的外科口罩进行呼吸道源头控制。
Ann Occup Hyg. 2014 Jul;58(6):771-81. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/meu023. Epub 2014 Apr 15.
7
The critical importance of mask seals on respirator performance: An analytical and simulation approach.口罩密封对呼吸器性能的至关重要性:一种分析和模拟方法。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 17;16(2):e0246720. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246720. eCollection 2021.
8
Medical face masks offer self-protection against aerosols: An evaluation using a practical in vitro approach on a dummy head.医用口罩可对气溶胶提供自我防护:基于模拟人头的实际体外方法评估。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 3;16(3):e0248099. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248099. eCollection 2021.
9
Assessing the filtration efficiency and regulatory status of N95s and nontraditional filtering face-piece respirators available during the COVID-19 pandemic.评估 COVID-19 大流行期间 N95 及非传统过滤式口罩呼吸器的过滤效率和监管状况。
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Jul 29;21(1):712. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06008-8.
10
KN95 filtering facepiece respirators distributed in South Africa fail safety testing protocols.KN95 过滤式面罩呼吸器在南非的安全测试中失败。
S Afr Med J. 2020 Dec 9;0(0):13162. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2021.v111i3.15381.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors influencing bacterial viability on face masks and bactericidal effect of disinfection methods.影响口罩上细菌生存能力的因素及消毒方法的杀菌效果
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 8;15(1):24357. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-09204-7.
2
Disposable surgical masks affect the decomposition of Zostera muelleri.一次性医用口罩会影响海菖蒲的分解。
Mar Pollut Bull. 2023 Mar;188:114695. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.114695. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
3
Comparison of bacterial filtration efficiency vs. particle filtration efficiency to assess the performance of non-medical face masks.比较细菌过滤效率与颗粒过滤效率,以评估非医用口罩的性能。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 24;12(1):1188. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05245-4.

本文引用的文献

1
A Practical Approach to Filtering Facepiece Respirator Decontamination and Reuse: Ultraviolet Germicidal Irradiation.过滤式面罩呼吸器去污与再利用的实用方法:紫外线杀菌辐照
Curr Treat Options Infect Dis. 2021;13(2):35-46. doi: 10.1007/s40506-021-00247-8. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
2
Facemask shortage and the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak: Reflections on public health measures.口罩短缺与新型冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫情:对公共卫生措施的思考
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Apr 3;21:100329. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100329. eCollection 2020 Apr.
3
Rational use of face masks in the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间口罩的合理使用
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 May;8(5):434-436. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30134-X. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
4
Evaluation of filtration characteristics and microbial recovery rates of commercial filtering facepiece respirators against airborne bacterial particles.评价商用过滤式口罩对空气中细菌颗粒物的过滤特性和微生物回收率。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Sep 10;682:729-736. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.153. Epub 2019 May 16.
5
Survival of Microorganisms on Nonwovens Used for the Construction of Filtering Facepiece Respirators.非织造布用于过滤式防颗粒物呼吸器的构建时微生物的存活情况。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Mar 31;16(7):1154. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16071154.
6
Assessment of influenza virus exposure and recovery from contaminated surgical masks and N95 respirators.评估污染的手术口罩和 N95 呼吸器上流感病毒的暴露和清除情况。
J Virol Methods. 2018 Oct;260:98-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2018.05.009. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
7
Relative survival of Bacillus subtilis spores loaded on filtering facepiece respirators after five decontamination methods.经五种去污方法处理后,过滤式面罩呼吸器上负载的枯草芽孢杆菌孢子的相对存活率。
Indoor Air. 2018 May 31;28(5):754-62. doi: 10.1111/ina.12475.
8
Ultraviolet germicidal irradiation of influenza-contaminated N95 filtering facepiece respirators.紫外线对受流感污染的 N95 过滤式防护口罩的消毒。
Am J Infect Control. 2018 Jul;46(7):e49-e55. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2018.02.018. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
9
Washable antimicrobial polyester/aluminum air filter with a high capture efficiency and low pressure drop.可清洗的抗菌聚酯/铝空气过滤器,具有高捕获效率和低压降。
J Hazard Mater. 2018 Jun 5;351:29-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.02.043. Epub 2018 Feb 24.
10
Efficacy of an Automated Multiple Emitter Whole-Room Ultraviolet-C Disinfection System Against Coronaviruses MHV and MERS-CoV.一种自动多发射器全室紫外线-C消毒系统对冠状病毒MHV和中东呼吸综合征冠状病毒的疗效
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016 May;37(5):598-9. doi: 10.1017/ice.2015.348. Epub 2016 Jan 28.