Analysis of the agreement between colposcopic impression and histopathological diagnosis of cervical biopsy in a single tertiary center of Chengdu.

PURPOSE

The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the agreement between colposcopic impression and histopathological diagnosis of cervical biopsy.

METHODS

The medical records of patients underwent a colposcopy-guided cervical biopsy at Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital between January 2017 and January 2019 were collected, including age, menopausal status, cervical cytology and human papillomavirus (HPV) test results, type of transformation zone, colposcopic diagnosis and histopathological outcomes of cervical biopsy. Colposcopy was carried out using 2011 colposcopic terminology of International Federation for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy (IFCPC). Related variables were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 495 patients were collected in this study. The perfect agreement between colposcopic impression and histopathological diagnosis was 46.9%, and the strength of agreement with kappa value was 0.283 (P < 0.001), and the agreement within 1 grade was 93.5%. Positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), sensitivity, specificity, false-positive rate and false-negative rate of detecting HSIL or more (HSIL +) were 93.1%, 57.8%, 80.9%, 93.9%, 6.1% and 45.3%, respectively. Colposcopic diagnosis more often underestimated (43.2%) [especially in HSIL (59.3%) and carcinoma (70.7%) patients] than overestimated (9.9%) in cervical lesions. The results of cytology, HPV status, patients' age and different experiences of practitioners were the factors for under-diagnosis of HSIL + by colposcopy.

CONCLUSION

Colposcopy is an excellent tool to estimate cervical high-grade lesion but is imprecise. Many factors can bias the diagnosis of colposcopy, especially the known results of cervical cytology and HPV. Precise diagnosis of cervical lesion should rely on the colposcopy-directed biopsy.