Suppr超能文献

优化隐匿性宫颈癌的检测:中国一项前瞻性多中心研究

Optimizing the Detection of Occult Cervical Cancer: A Prospective Multicentre Study in China.

作者信息

Li Yanyun, Gong Ying-Xin, Wang Qing, Gao Shujun, Zhang Hongwei, Xie Feng, Cong Qing, Chen Limei, Zhou Qi, Hong Zubei, Qiu Lihua, Li Fang, Xie Yu, Sui Long

机构信息

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Renji Hospital of Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Int J Womens Health. 2021 Oct 27;13:1005-1015. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S329129. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Early-stage cervical cancer is usually diagnosed by colposcopy-directed biopsy (CDB) and/or endocervical curettage (ECC), but some neglected lesions must be detected by conization because they are occult. This study aimed to explore the optimal method for detecting these "occult" cervical cancers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 1299 patients who were high-risk for early-stage cervical cancer from five centres in China were prospectively included. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of cytology, HPV testing, colposcopy and CDB&ECC for detecting "occult" cervical cancer and discussed the diagnostic importance of transformation zone (TZ) type, conization length and the proportion of cervical cone excision.

RESULTS

The diagnostic agreement between colposcopy impression and conization was 64.5% and 72.4% between CDB&ECC and conization. Forty-two patients were finally diagnosed with pathologic cancer, and the sensitivities of cytology, colposcopy, CDB&ECC were 4.8%, 7.1%, and 47.4%, respectively. Twenty cases were neglected by CDB&ECC but further diagnosed as cancer by conization, considered to be occult cervical cancer, accounting for 1.6%. Cytologic high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL)+, positive HPV, biopsy HSIL+ and cervical TZ type 3 were considered risk factors for developing HSIL+, while colposcopy impression HSIL+ was not. There was a significant difference between cancerous and HSIL patients in the proportion of cervical cone excision (P<0.001), which was recognized as a risk factor (P<0.001) for detecting cancer, while the length of cervical cone excision was not. The average proportion was 0.62, and the minimal effective proportion was 0.56.

CONCLUSION

Since the incidence of occult cervical cancer neglected by CDB&ECC, colposcopy and cytology was far beyond expectations, conization is necessary, especially in patients with TZ type 3, high-grade cytology and biopsy results. As the cervical length varies in patients, the proportion of cervical cone excision might be a better indicator for detecting occult cervical cancer.

摘要

目的

早期宫颈癌通常通过阴道镜引导下活检(CDB)和/或宫颈管刮术(ECC)进行诊断,但一些被忽视的病变必须通过锥切术来检测,因为它们很隐匿。本研究旨在探索检测这些“隐匿性”宫颈癌的最佳方法。

患者与方法

前瞻性纳入了来自中国五个中心的1299例早期宫颈癌高危患者。我们评估了细胞学检查、HPV检测、阴道镜检查以及CDB&ECC检测“隐匿性”宫颈癌的诊断性能,并探讨了转化区(TZ)类型、锥切长度和宫颈锥切比例的诊断重要性。

结果

阴道镜印象与锥切术之间的诊断一致性为64.5%,CDB&ECC与锥切术之间为72.4%。最终有42例患者被诊断为病理癌症,细胞学检查、阴道镜检查、CDB&ECC的敏感性分别为4.8%、7.1%和47.4%。有20例患者被CDB&ECC漏诊,但通过锥切术进一步诊断为癌症,被认为是隐匿性宫颈癌,占1.6%。细胞学高级别鳞状上皮内病变(HSIL)+、HPV阳性、活检HSIL+和宫颈TZ 3型被认为是发生HSIL+的危险因素,而阴道镜印象HSIL+则不是。癌性患者和HSIL患者在宫颈锥切比例上存在显著差异(P<0.001),这被认为是检测癌症的危险因素(P<0.001),而宫颈锥切长度则不是。平均比例为0.62,最小有效比例为0.56。

结论

由于CDB&ECC、阴道镜检查和细胞学检查漏诊的隐匿性宫颈癌发生率远超预期,锥切术是必要的,尤其是对于TZ 3型、高级别细胞学检查和活检结果的患者。由于患者宫颈长度各不相同,宫颈锥切比例可能是检测隐匿性宫颈癌的更好指标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5578/8558636/496573f7a84a/IJWH-13-1005-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验