Suppr超能文献

密歇根手功能问卷的测量性能:创伤性手部损伤人群的 Rasch 分析反应。

Measurement properties of the Michigan hand outcomes questionnaire: Rasch analysis of responses from a traumatic hand injury population.

机构信息

School of Physical Therapy, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.

Roth McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Centre, St. Joseph's Hospital, London, Canada.

出版信息

Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Jul;44(15):4081-4089. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1894246. Epub 2021 Mar 8.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to use Rasch analysis to test the content, scoring, and measurement properties of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ).

METHODS

MHQ scores from 196 patients with hand and wrist conditions were collected in an outpatient hand rehabilitation facility. Rasch analysis was conducted to assess the fit statistics of MHQ to confirm the scaling structure of disability subscales, and to identify differential item functioning.

RESULTS

The MHQ did not fit with the Rasch model (χ = 2376.78, df = 74,  < 0.001), and most thresholds of item responses were disordered. The original scoring algorithm derived from 5-point Likert response options was adjusted to 3-point Likert (10 items) and 4-point Likert (11 items) based on the visual inspection of the thresholds map. Differential item functioning was present in the revised scale based on the age, sex, and dominant hand. Only 3 revised subscales of the MHQ including activities daily living (one hand), aesthetics, and satisfaction showed acceptable fit to the Rasch model. Unidimensionality was achieved in all revised subscales.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall MHQ had a substantial misfit from the Rasch model. Despite efforts of item reduction and rescoring, we did not reach a satisfactory solution. This calls into question the validity of the statistical evaluations performed on this scale using the traditional scoring.Implications for rehabilitationThe MHQ was designed to measure different dimensions of pain and disability but demonstrates multiple measurement problems that undermine it use in present form.It is not appropriate to sum all 37 items of the MHQ into a single score.Three subscales of activities daily living (one hand), aesthetics, and satisfaction can provide unidimensional subscales scores with interval level scaling if scored with our proposed Rasch-based revised scoring.The 27-item version of the MHQ is shown to have strong psychometric properties for administration with patients with hand injuries; however, it requires further validation.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在使用 Rasch 分析检验密歇根手功能问卷(MHQ)的内容、评分和测量特性。

方法

在一家门诊手康复机构中收集了 196 例手部和腕部疾病患者的 MHQ 评分。进行 Rasch 分析以评估 MHQ 的拟合统计数据,以确认残疾分量表的缩放结构,并确定差异项目功能。

结果

MHQ 不符合 Rasch 模型(χ=2376.78,df=74, < 0.001),并且大多数项目反应的阈值都是无序的。基于阈值图的直观检查,从 5 点 Likert 反应选项得出的原始评分算法被调整为 3 点 Likert(10 项)和 4 点 Likert(11 项)。基于年龄、性别和优势手,修订后的量表存在差异项目功能。只有 MHQ 的 3 个修订分量表(单手日常生活活动、美学和满意度)符合 Rasch 模型的要求。所有修订后的分量表都实现了单维性。

结论

MHQ 总体上与 Rasch 模型存在较大的不拟合。尽管进行了项目减少和重新评分的努力,但我们没有找到一个令人满意的解决方案。这使得使用传统评分方法对该量表进行的统计评估的有效性受到质疑。

康复意义

MHQ 旨在测量疼痛和残疾的不同维度,但存在多种测量问题,削弱了其在现有形式下的使用。

将 MHQ 的 37 个项目全部加总为一个单一分数是不合适的。如果使用我们提出的基于 Rasch 的修订评分进行评分,日常生活活动(单手)、美学和满意度这三个分量表可以提供具有区间水平的单维分量表得分。

27 项 MHQ 版本在手部损伤患者的管理中显示出较强的心理计量学特性;然而,它需要进一步验证。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验