Vascular Institute of New York, Brooklyn, NY.
Vascular Institute of New York, Brooklyn, NY.
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Sep;74(3):958-962. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.02.037. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
To determine whether differences exist in fluoroscopy time and radiation exposure during lower extremity endovascular procedures performed by fellowship trained vascular surgeons vs general surgeons, to minimize radiation exposure to operating room staff.
A retrospective review of all lower extremity endovascular procedures was performed from August 1, 2014, to January 29, 2016. The procedures were performed by the surgical department's four surgeons with endovascular privileges: two vascular surgeons and two general surgeons. Only procedures involving lower extremity arterial angiograms with balloon angioplasty, stenting, or atherectomy were included. The operative records were reviewed for each case. The total fluoroscopy time and total radiation dose for each procedure were recorded. Procedures were grouped according to the number of endovascular interventions as one to two interventions, three to four interventions, and five or more interventions performed. Statistical analysis was performed with a P value of less than .05 considered significant.
About 271 lower extremity endovascular procedures were performed during the study period by 4 surgeons. The average age of the patient population was 70 years. The total number of procedures performed over the study period were 112, 45, 91, and 25 for surgeons 1 through 4, respectively. On average, 3.24 interventions were performed during each procedure. Vascular surgeons were found to have shorter fluoroscopy time for procedures involving one to two (7.8 vs 30.1; P < .01), three to four (9.3 vs 34.2; P < .01), and five or more (11.5 vs 51.9; P < .01) interventions. Vascular surgeons were also found to have less radiation exposure compared with general surgeons in procedures with one to two (1.69 vs 3.53; P = .001) and five or more (2.3 vs 5.4; P = .003) interventions. There was no significant difference in radiation exposure between vascular and general surgeons for procedures with three to four interventions (5.86 vs 5.59; P = .95).
In this small series at our institution, lower extremity endovascular procedures performed by specialty trained vascular surgeons were associated with both decreased operative fluoroscopy time and decreased radiation exposure when compared with general surgeons.
确定在下肢血管腔内手术中,接受过 fellowship培训的血管外科医生与普通外科医生之间在透视时间和辐射暴露方面是否存在差异,以尽量减少手术室工作人员的辐射暴露。
回顾性分析 2014 年 8 月 1 日至 2016 年 1 月 29 日期间所有下肢血管腔内手术。手术由具有血管腔内手术权限的外科部门的 4 名外科医生进行:2 名血管外科医生和 2 名普通外科医生。仅包括下肢动脉血管造影伴球囊血管成形术、支架置入术或旋切术的手术。对每个病例的手术记录进行了审查。记录了每个手术的总透视时间和总辐射剂量。根据介入的数量将手术分为 1-2 次介入、3-4 次介入和 5 次或更多次介入。统计分析 P 值小于 0.05 认为有统计学意义。
研究期间,4 名外科医生共进行了 271 例下肢血管腔内手术。患者人群的平均年龄为 70 岁。在研究期间,每位外科医生进行的手术数量分别为 112 例、45 例、91 例和 25 例。平均每次手术进行 3.24 次介入。血管外科医生在进行 1-2 次(7.8 与 30.1;P <.01)、3-4 次(9.3 与 34.2;P <.01)和 5 次或更多次(11.5 与 51.9;P <.01)介入的手术中透视时间更短。与普通外科医生相比,血管外科医生在进行 1-2 次(1.69 与 3.53;P =.001)和 5 次或更多次(2.3 与 5.4;P =.003)介入的手术中辐射暴露也较少。血管外科医生与普通外科医生在进行 3-4 次介入手术时(5.86 与 5.59;P =.95)辐射暴露没有显著差异。
在本机构的这项小系列研究中,与普通外科医生相比,接受过专业培训的血管外科医生进行的下肢血管腔内手术,手术透视时间更短,辐射暴露更少。