Nephrology Division, IRCCS Ca' Granda Foundation and Maggiore Policlinico Hospital, Milano, Italy.
Hepatology and Liver Transplant Unit, Hospital Universitario Austral, Pilar, Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Ann Hepatol. 2021 Nov-Dec;25:100337. doi: 10.1016/j.aohep.2021.100337. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
The introduction of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) agents promises to change dramatically the management of hepatitis C in kidney transplant recipients, a patient group where the treatment of hepatitis C is historically challenging. The purpose of the current study was to assess (in a 'real-life' setting) the safety and efficacy of all-oral, interferon-free, direct-acting antiviral agents in kidney transplant recipients with HCV.
We performed a single-arm, multi-center study in a cohort (n = 95) of kidney transplant recipients who underwent antiviral therapy with DAAs. The primary end-point was sustained virologic response (SVR) (serum HCV RNA < 15 IU/mL, 12 weeks after treatment ended; SVR12). We recorded data on on-treatment adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and laboratory abnormalities.
Various regimens were adopted at the discretion of the treating physician: elbasvir/grazoprevir (n = 11), paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombitasvir/dasabuvir (PrOD) regimens ± ribavirin (n = 23), and sofosbuvir-based regimens ± ribavirin (n = 61). The SVR12 rate was 93.7% (89/95) (95% CI, 88%; 98%), according to intention-to-treat analysis; three patients without viral response (n = 3) were found. Ribavirin was administered in 8 (8.4%) allograft recipients. The frequency of drop-outs was 4.2% (4/95) (95% CI, 0.2%; 8.2%); these were related to arthralgia/myalgia (n = 2), fatigue (n = 1), and lowered estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (n = 1). There were no differences with regard to serum creatinine and eGFR before and after antiviral therapy and during follow-up in the whole cohort. The patient who interrupted antiviral treatment due to raised serum creatinine was on sofosbuvir/daclatasvir regimen; one of the four drop-outs obtained SVR.
All-oral, interferon-free therapy with DAAs for chronic HCV after kidney transplantation was effective and well-tolerated in a 'real-life' clinical setting. Identical results have been observed in patients with intact kidneys or advanced chronic kidney disease. Careful evaluation of kidney function over follow-up in kidney transplant recipients who received DAAs regimens is recommended. Clinical trials aimed to assess whether sustained viral response translates into improved patient/graft survival are under way.
直接作用抗病毒(DAA)药物的引入有望极大地改变肾移植受者丙型肝炎的治疗方式,在肾移植受者中,丙型肝炎的治疗历来具有挑战性。本研究的目的是(在“真实生活”环境中)评估所有口服、无干扰素的直接作用抗病毒药物在 HCV 肾移植受者中的安全性和疗效。
我们在一组(n=95)接受 DAA 抗病毒治疗的肾移植受者中进行了一项单臂、多中心研究。主要终点是持续病毒学应答(SVR)(治疗结束后 12 周时血清 HCV RNA <15 IU/mL,SVR12)。我们记录了治疗期间不良事件(AE)、严重 AE 和实验室异常的数据。
根据治疗医生的判断采用了各种方案:Elbasvir/grazoprevir(n=11)、Paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombitasvir/dasabuvir(PrOD)方案±利巴韦林(n=23)和索非布韦为基础的方案±利巴韦林(n=61)。根据意向治疗分析,SVR12 率为 93.7%(89/95)(95%CI,88%;98%),发现 3 名无病毒应答的患者(n=3)。在 8 名(8.4%)移植受者中给予利巴韦林。脱落率为 4.2%(4/95)(95%CI,0.2%;8.2%);这些与关节痛/肌痛(n=2)、疲劳(n=1)和估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)降低(n=1)有关。整个队列在抗病毒治疗前后及随访期间血清肌酐和 eGFR 无差异。因血清肌酐升高而中断抗病毒治疗的患者接受了索非布韦/达卡他韦治疗;4 名脱落者中有 1 名获得 SVR。
肾移植后使用 DAA 进行无干扰素的全口服慢性 HCV 治疗在“真实生活”临床环境中是有效且耐受良好的。在肾功能完整或慢性肾脏病晚期的患者中观察到了相同的结果。建议对接受 DAA 方案治疗的肾移植受者进行肾功能的密切随访评估。正在进行旨在评估持续病毒应答是否转化为改善患者/移植物生存的临床试验。