Pernambuco Health College, Recife, Brazil.
Department of Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2022 Feb;32(2):183-188. doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0943. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
The Lichtenstein repair has long been heralded as the gold standard for unilateral primary inguinal hernias. However, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) repairs have gained popularity over the past decades given its advantages in recurrent, bilateral, and now even in primary inguinal hernias. We aim to further explore the perception of different techniques among surgeons internationally. A questionnaire was posted in three closed groups for surgeons and residents on Facebook and surgical groups on WhatsApp. It was also e-mailed to members of the following surgical societies: Mexican Society of Surgery, Brazilian Hernia Society, Asia Pacific Hernia Society, and European Hernia Society. Descriptive and basic comparative statistical analyses were performed. In total, 874 surgeons answered the survey: 759 (86.9%) were male and 418 (47.8%) were from North America, 735 (84.1%) had completed training and 605 (69.2%) considered themselves hernia specialists. If safety profiles of inguinal herniorrhaphy were equal, 533 (61%) would choose MIS. Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal ranked first among preferred techniques if the cost of all techniques was the same. Safety of the procedure followed by experience of the surgeon is the most influential factors. Lastly, hernia specialists were more likely to choose an MIS technique ( < .0001). When an international sample of 874 attending and trainee surgeons were surveyed about what technique they would prefer to repair their own uncomplicated unilateral inguinal hernia, most chose MIS. Safety of the procedure and the surgeon's experience were the most important factors in choosing a surgical technique.
Lichtenstein 修补术长期以来一直被誉为单侧原发性腹股沟疝的金标准。然而,微创外科 (MIS) 修补术在过去几十年中越来越受欢迎,因为它在复发性、双侧和现在甚至在原发性腹股沟疝中具有优势。我们旨在进一步探讨国际外科医生对不同技术的看法。我们在 Facebook 上的三个封闭外科医生和住院医生小组以及 WhatsApp 上的外科医生小组发布了一份问卷,并通过电子邮件发送给以下外科医生协会的成员:墨西哥外科学会、巴西疝学会、亚太疝学会和欧洲疝学会。进行了描述性和基本比较统计分析。共有 874 名外科医生回答了调查:759 名(86.9%)为男性,418 名(47.8%)来自北美,735 名(84.1%)完成了培训,605 名(69.2%)认为自己是疝专家。如果腹股沟疝修补术的安全性相同,533 名(61%)会选择 MIS。如果所有技术的成本相同,腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术是首选技术。安全性是继医生经验之后的最主要影响因素。最后,疝专家更有可能选择 MIS 技术(<0.0001)。当对 874 名主治和住院外科医生进行国际调查,询问他们会选择哪种技术来修复自己的简单单侧腹股沟疝时,大多数人选择了 MIS。手术安全性和医生经验是选择手术技术的最重要因素。