Department of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1675 Observatory Dr., Madison 53706.
Department of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1675 Observatory Dr., Madison 53706.
J Dairy Sci. 2021 May;104(5):6096-6112. doi: 10.3168/jds.2020-19380. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
Social housing of preweaned calves can benefit their welfare, but housing and cross sucking are potential barriers to adoption for farmers. For farms using outdoor hutches, an option is to pair adjacent hutches with a shared fence. Our objective was to investigate milk- or starter-feeding strategies to mitigate cross sucking in this system. Holstein heifers were housed in pairs (n = 32 pairs) and divided into 4 treatments (n = 8 pairs each) in a 2 × 2 factorial design: milk in an open bucket with starter in only a bucket (OB-SB), milk in an open bucket and starter in both a bucket and a specialized teat bottle (Braden bottle; OB-BB), milk in a slow-flow teat bucket with starter in only a bucket (TB-SB), or milk in a slow-flow teat bucket and starter in both a bucket and a specialized teat bottle (TB-BB). When starter was first offered (d 6 ± 1 of life, mean ± SD), calf latency to approach was recorded, averaged within pairs, and compared between starter treatments using a linear mixed model with fixed effect of treatment and random effect of pair within treatment. Calves were initially bottle fed; milk treatments began on d 14 ± 1 of life and ended when calves were completely weaned (d 53 ± 1). Calves were observed for behaviors such as drinking milk and cross sucking twice weekly for 30 min during the afternoon milk meal using continuous video, with values averaged within pairs. Linear mixed models were run separately before (wk 3-6) and after (wk 7-8) weaning, with fixed effects of milk- and starter-feeding treatments, week, and the 2- and 3-way interactions, with week as repeated measure and pair as subject. Pairs with Braden bottles and buckets approached starter sooner than those with only buckets (Braden bottles vs. no Braden bottles: 13.1 ± 6.1 vs. 33.2 ± 6.1 min, LSM ± SEM). Before weaning, pairs with open buckets for both milk and starter cross sucked for at least twice as long (OB-SB: 2.9 ± 0.3 min) as all other treatments (OB-BB: 1.5 ± 0.3 min; TB-SB: 0.4 ± 0.3 min; TB-BB: 0.5 ± 0.3 min). This pattern held during weaning, when cross sucking increased overall (OB-SB: 3.9 ± 0.4 min; OB-BB: 1.8 ± 0.4 min; TB-SB: 0.9 ± 0.4 min; TB-BB: 1.6 ± 0.4 min). Regardless of starter treatment, calves spent less time cross sucking when fed milk in teat buckets, which extended the milk meal relative to open buckets (teat bucket vs. open bucket: preweaning = 7.0 ± 0.2 vs. 1.6 ± 0.2 min; weaning = 3.0 ± 0.1 vs. 0.6 ± 0.1 min). When calves are fed milk in open buckets, a novel option for reducing cross sucking is to provide starter through a specialized bottle. Nonetheless, providing milk in slow-flow teat buckets had the greatest effect on reducing cross sucking by directing suckling to the teat instead of another calf or pen objects.
社交化饲养未断奶犊牛有益于其福利,但饲养方式和相互吸吮可能会成为农民采用这种方式的障碍。对于使用户外畜栏的农场,可以选择将相邻畜栏用共享围栏隔开。我们的目的是研究在这种系统中减少相互吸吮的牛奶或开食料喂养策略。荷斯坦小母牛成对饲养(n=32 对),并分为 4 个处理(n=8 对),采用 2×2 因子设计:仅在敞开的桶中喂牛奶和开食料(OB-SB)、在敞开的桶和专用奶嘴瓶(布拉登瓶;OB-BB)中喂牛奶和开食料、在缓慢流动的奶嘴桶中仅喂牛奶和开食料(TB-SB)或在缓慢流动的奶嘴桶和专用奶嘴瓶(TB-BB)中喂牛奶和开食料。首次提供开食料(出生后第 6±1 天,平均值±标准差)时,记录犊牛接近的潜伏期,在对中平均,并使用具有处理固定效应和处理内对随机效应的线性混合模型,根据开食料处理进行比较。犊牛最初是用奶瓶喂养的;在第 14±1 天开始进行牛奶处理,并在第 53±1 天完全断奶时结束。在下午的牛奶餐期间,使用连续视频每周两次观察犊牛 30 分钟的行为,如喝牛奶和相互吸吮,并在对中平均。在断奶前(第 3-6 周)和断奶后(第 7-8 周)分别运行线性混合模型,具有牛奶和开食料喂养处理、周和 2-和 3 向交互的固定效应,周作为重复测量,对作为主体。使用布拉登瓶和桶的对比仅使用桶的对更早地接近开食料(布拉登瓶与无布拉登瓶:13.1±6.1 与 33.2±6.1 分钟,LSM±SEM)。在断奶前,同时在敞开的桶中喂牛奶和开食料的对相互吸吮的时间至少长两倍(OB-SB:2.9±0.3 分钟)比所有其他处理(OB-BB:1.5±0.3 分钟;TB-SB:0.4±0.3 分钟;TB-BB:0.5±0.3 分钟)。这种模式在断奶期间持续存在,因为相互吸吮总体上增加(OB-SB:3.9±0.4 分钟;OB-BB:1.8±0.4 分钟;TB-SB:0.9±0.4 分钟;TB-BB:1.6±0.4 分钟)。无论开食料处理如何,当用奶嘴桶喂牛奶时,犊牛花在相互吸吮上的时间减少,这使牛奶餐相对于敞开的桶延长(奶嘴桶与敞开的桶:断奶前=7.0±0.2 与 1.6±0.2 分钟;断奶=3.0±0.1 与 0.6±0.1 分钟)。当犊牛用敞开的桶喂牛奶时,减少相互吸吮的一个新选择是通过专用瓶提供开食料。尽管如此,通过将吸吮引导到奶嘴而不是另一头犊牛或畜栏物品,使用缓慢流动的奶嘴桶喂牛奶对减少相互吸吮的效果最大。