Department of Periodontics, Tagore Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India, Phone: +91 9884957327, e-mail:
Department of Periodontics, Craniofacial Dental Clinic, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2020 Oct 1;21(10):1159-1164.
The aim of the study was to compare three different techniques using scalpel, electrosurgery, and laser for gingival depigmentation in terms of pain, discomfort, duration of procedure, wound healing, and repigmentation.
Thirty patients in the age range of 24-38 years were briefed about the surgical procedure and an informed consent was obtained and they were randomly allocated into three groups of 10 individuals (5 males and 5 females) each: those undergoing depigmentation with scalpel (group I), electrosurgery (group II), and diode lasers (Biolase) (group III). Individuals of all three groups were asked to describe the level of pain and discomfort by using the visual analog scale (VAS) 2 hours, 24 hours, and 1 week postoperatively. Further, the groups were compared based on duration of procedure, wound healing, and repigmentation at the end of 14 months.
All the groups showed a decrease in the pain levels, which was statistically highly significant 1 week postoperatively when compared 24 hours postoperatively. There was a statistically significant difference in the pain levels between the scalpel, electrosurgery, and lasers groups after 24 hours ( < 0.001), with the lasers group demonstrating significantly less pain and discomfort. There was significant difference between the groups with respect to the duration of procedure, with less mean time for completion of the procedure observed for group III. Furthermore, less time for wound healing was observed in group III as compared to other groups. Total 8 out 10 patients in group I, 7 out of 10 patients in group II, and 2 out of 10 patients in group III showed repigmentation at the end of 14 months.
The rising concern for esthetic demand of an individual requires the removal of hyperpigmented gingival areas to create a confident and pleasing smile, which could be easily attained by using laser.
Laser is an effective and fast tool that causes less pain, discomfort, faster healing, and delayed repigmentation compared with scalpel or electrosurgery for gingival depigmentation.
本研究的目的是比较使用手术刀、电外科和激光三种不同技术进行牙龈去色素化,从疼痛、不适、手术持续时间、伤口愈合和再色素沉着等方面进行评估。
将手术程序告知 30 名年龄在 24-38 岁之间的患者,并获得知情同意,然后将他们随机分为三组,每组 10 人(5 男 5 女):手术刀去色素化组(I 组)、电外科组(II 组)和二极管激光组(Biolase)(III 组)。所有三组患者均使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)在术后 2 小时、24 小时和 1 周时描述疼痛和不适程度。进一步,根据术后 14 个月的手术持续时间、伤口愈合和再色素沉着情况对三组进行比较。
所有组的疼痛水平均降低,与术后 24 小时相比,术后 1 周的降低具有统计学高度显著性。与电外科和激光组相比,手术刀、电外科和激光组在术后 24 小时的疼痛水平存在统计学差异(<0.001),激光组的疼痛和不适明显较轻。三组之间在手术持续时间上存在显著差异,完成手术的平均时间 III 组最短。此外,与其他组相比,III 组的伤口愈合时间更短。术后 14 个月时,I 组 10 名患者中有 8 名、II 组中有 7 名、III 组中有 2 名出现再色素沉着。
由于个人对美观的需求不断增加,需要去除过度色素沉着的牙龈区域,以营造自信和愉悦的笑容,激光可轻松实现这一目标。
与手术刀或电外科相比,激光是一种有效且快速的工具,可减轻疼痛、不适,加速愈合,并延迟再色素沉着。