MRC Institute of Genetic and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Edinburgh, UK.
Diabetologia. 2021 Jun;64(6):1320-1331. doi: 10.1007/s00125-021-05413-7. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Our aim was to assess the use of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) in people with type 1 diabetes in Scotland and its association with glycaemic control, as measured by HbA levels, frequency of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and severe hospitalised hypoglycaemia (SHH), overall and stratified by baseline HbA.
We included 4684 individuals with type 1 diabetes from the national Scottish register, who commenced CSII between 2004 and 2019. We presented crude within-person differences from baseline HbA over time since initiation, crude DKA and SHH event-rates pre-/post-CSII exposure. We then used mixed models to assess the significance of CSII exposure, taking into account: (1) the diffuse nature of the intervention (i.e. structured education often precedes initiation); (2) repeated within-person measurements; and (3) background time-trends occurring pre-intervention.
HbA decreased after CSII initiation, with a median within-person change of -5.5 mmol/mol (IQR -12.0, 0.0) (-0.5% [IQR -1.1, 0.0]). Within-person changes were most substantial in those with the highest baseline HbA, with median -21.0 mmol/mol (-30.0, -11.0) (-1.9% [-2.7, -1.0]) change in those with a baseline >84 mmol/mol (9.8%) within a year of exposure, that was sustained: -19.0 mmol/mol (-27.6, -6.5) (-1.7% [-2.5, -0.6]) at ≥5 years. Statistical significance and magnitude of change were supported by the mixed models results. The crude DKA event-rate was significantly lower in post-CSII person-time compared with pre-CSII person-time: 49.6 events (95% CI 46.3, 53.1) per 1000 person-years vs 67.9 (64.1, 71.9); rate ratio from Bayesian mixed models adjusting for pre-exposure trend: 0.61 (95% credible interval [CrI] 0.47, 0.77; posterior probability of reduction pp = 1.00). The crude overall SHH event-rate in post-CSII vs pre-CSII person-time was also lower: 17.8 events (95% CI 15.8, 19.9) per 1000 person-years post-exposure vs 25.8 (23.5, 28.3) pre-exposure; rate ratio from Bayesian mixed models adjusting for pre-exposure trend: 0.67 (95% CrI 0.45, 1.01; pp = 0.97).
CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: CSII therapy was associated with marked falls in HbA especially in those with high baseline HbA. CSII was independently associated with reduced DKA and SHH rates. CSII appears to be an effective option for intensive insulin therapy in people with diabetes for improving suboptimal glycaemic control.
目的/假设:我们的目的是评估苏格兰 1 型糖尿病患者使用持续皮下胰岛素输注(CSII)的情况及其与糖化血红蛋白(HbA)水平、糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)和严重住院低血糖(SHH)频率的关系,总体上和按基线 HbA 分层。
我们纳入了来自国家苏格兰登记处的 4684 名 1 型糖尿病患者,他们在 2004 年至 2019 年间开始使用 CSII。我们呈现了从基线 HbA 开始后随时间的个体内差异,以及 CSII 暴露前后的 DKA 和 SHH 事件发生率。然后,我们使用混合模型评估 CSII 暴露的意义,同时考虑到:(1)干预的弥漫性质(即结构化教育通常先于开始);(2)个体内的重复测量;(3)干预前的背景时间趋势。
CSII 开始后 HbA 下降,个体内变化中位数为-5.5mmol/mol(IQR -12.0,0.0)(-0.5% [IQR -1.1,0.0])。在基线 HbA 最高的患者中,个体内变化最大,基线>84mmol/mol(9.8%)的患者在接触 CSII 后一年内的中位变化为-21.0mmol/mol(-30.0,-11.0)(-1.9% [-2.7,-0.6]),并且在≥5 年内保持稳定:-19.0mmol/mol(-27.6,-6.5)(-1.7% [-2.5,-0.6])。混合模型结果支持了统计学意义和变化幅度。CSII 暴露后的 DKA 事件发生率明显低于 CSII 暴露前的 DKA 事件发生率:每 1000 人年有 49.6 例(95%CI 46.3,53.1)与 67.9 例(64.1,71.9);贝叶斯混合模型调整预暴露趋势后的发生率比:0.61(95%可信区间 [CrI] 0.47,0.77;后验概率减少 pp=1.00)。CSII 暴露后的总体 SHH 事件发生率也低于 CSII 暴露前的 SHH 事件发生率:暴露后每 1000 人年有 17.8 例(95%CI 15.8,19.9)与 25.8 例(23.5,28.3);贝叶斯混合模型调整预暴露趋势后的发生率比:0.67(95%CrI 0.45,1.01;pp=0.97)。
结论/解释:CSII 治疗与 HbA 的显著下降有关,尤其是在基线 HbA 较高的患者中。CSII 与 DKA 和 SHH 发生率的降低独立相关。CSII 似乎是改善血糖控制不佳的糖尿病患者强化胰岛素治疗的有效选择。