• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

安慰剂和反安慰剂反应在随机对照试验中的 Janus 激酶抑制剂单药治疗类风湿关节炎:一项荟萃分析。

Placebo and nocebo responses in randomized controlled trials of Janus kinase inhibitor monotherapy for rheumatoid arthritis : A meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology, Hanyang University Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Seoul, Korea (Republic of).

Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, 73, Goryeodae-ro, Seongbuk-gu, 02841, Seoul, Korea (Republic of).

出版信息

Z Rheumatol. 2022 Jun;81(5):430-437. doi: 10.1007/s00393-021-00969-6. Epub 2021 Mar 9.

DOI:10.1007/s00393-021-00969-6
PMID:33687525
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this meta-analysis was to assess the frequency and magnitude of placebo and nocebo responses in placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor monotherapy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis on the rates of placebo response, adverse effects (AEs), severe AEs (SAEs) and withdrawal due to AEs in placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of JAK inhibitor therapy for RA.

RESULTS

Five RCTs contained a total of 1422 patients (746 trial participants and 676 controls). The pooled incidence of an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response rate was 33.0% (95% CI 19.6-44.9%) in placebo-treated patients and 68.3% (95% CI 61.4-74.1%) in active drug-treated patients. A strong negative correlation was observed between drug efficacies (ACR20 response) and AE rates in the placebo arm, indicating that the stronger the placebo response, the weaker the nocebo response (r = -0.906, P = 0.034). The pooled estimate of at least one AE was 54.1% (95% CI 44.6-63.4%) in placebo-treated patients and 54.5% (95% CI 46.2-62.6%) in active drug-treated patients. The pooled SAE rate was 3.9% (95% CI 2.7-5.7%) in placebo-treated patients and 3.8% (95% CI 2.5-5.7%) in active comparator-treated patients. The pooled estimate of withdrawal owing to an AE was 4.1% (95% CI 1.4-11.3%) in placebo-treated patients and 2.1% (95% CI 0.8-5.4%) in active drug-treated patients. However, there were no differences in the pooled risk of AE, SAEs, or withdrawal owing to AEs between the active comparator and placebo groups. A strong positive correlation was observed in AE rates between the placebo and active arms, indicating that the stronger the nocebo response, the higher the AE rate in the active arm (r = 0.957, P = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

The frequency of placebo and nocebo responses was 33.0 and 54.1%, respectively, in JAK monotherapy trials for RA. The findings indicated that the strengths of placebo and nocebo responses are inversely proportional and that clinically significant differences were absent between AE, SAE, and dropout owing to AEs.

摘要

目的

本荟萃分析旨在评估 Janus 激酶(JAK)抑制剂单药治疗类风湿关节炎(RA)的安慰剂对照随机对照试验(RCT)中安慰剂和反安慰剂反应的频率和程度。

方法

我们对 JAK 抑制剂治疗 RA 的安慰剂对照 RCT 中安慰剂反应、不良反应(AE)、严重不良反应(SAE)和因 AE 停药的发生率进行了荟萃分析。

结果

5 项 RCT 共纳入 1422 例患者(746 例试验参与者和 676 例对照)。安慰剂治疗组的美国风湿病学会 20%(ACR20)反应率为 33.0%(95%CI 19.6-44.9%),活性药物治疗组为 68.3%(95%CI 61.4-74.1%)。药物疗效(ACR20 反应)与安慰剂组的 AE 发生率之间存在强烈的负相关,表明安慰剂反应越强,反安慰剂反应越弱(r=-0.906,P=0.034)。安慰剂治疗组至少有一种 AE 的发生率为 54.1%(95%CI 44.6-63.4%),活性药物治疗组为 54.5%(95%CI 46.2-62.6%)。安慰剂治疗组 SAE 发生率为 3.9%(95%CI 2.7-5.7%),活性药物治疗组为 3.8%(95%CI 2.5-5.7%)。安慰剂治疗组因 AE 停药的发生率为 4.1%(95%CI 1.4-11.3%),活性药物治疗组为 2.1%(95%CI 0.8-5.4%)。然而,活性对照与安慰剂组之间 AE、SAE 或因 AE 停药的发生率无差异。安慰剂组和活性药物组的 AE 发生率之间存在强烈的正相关,表明反安慰剂反应越强,活性药物组的 AE 发生率越高(r=0.957,P=0.012)。

结论

JAK 单药治疗 RA 的试验中安慰剂和反安慰剂反应的频率分别为 33.0%和 54.1%。研究结果表明,安慰剂和反安慰剂反应的强度呈反比关系,AE、SAE 和因 AE 停药之间不存在临床显著差异。

相似文献

1
Placebo and nocebo responses in randomized controlled trials of Janus kinase inhibitor monotherapy for rheumatoid arthritis : A meta-analysis.安慰剂和反安慰剂反应在随机对照试验中的 Janus 激酶抑制剂单药治疗类风湿关节炎:一项荟萃分析。
Z Rheumatol. 2022 Jun;81(5):430-437. doi: 10.1007/s00393-021-00969-6. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
2
Placebo and nocebo responses in randomized controlled trials of non-tumor necrosis factor biologics and Janus kinase inhibitors in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis showing insufficient response to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors: A meta-analysis.安慰剂和反安慰剂效应在随机对照试验中的非肿瘤坏死因子生物制剂和 Janus 激酶抑制剂治疗对肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂反应不足的活动性类风湿关节炎患者中的作用:一项荟萃分析。
Z Rheumatol. 2023 Jan;82(Suppl 1):59-67. doi: 10.1007/s00393-021-01047-7. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
3
Adverse Events and Nocebo Effects in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.炎症性肠病中的不良事件和反安慰剂效应:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Crohns Colitis. 2019 Sep 19;13(9):1201-1216. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjz087.
4
Nocebo responses in randomized controlled trials of COVID-19 vaccines.新冠疫苗随机对照试验中的反安慰剂效应
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022 Jan;60(1):5-12. doi: 10.5414/CP204028.
5
Examining the Nocebo Effect in Trials of Neuromodulators for Use in Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction.在用于胃肠-脑相互作用障碍的神经调节药物试验中研究反安慰剂效应。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2023 Apr 1;118(4):692-701. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002108. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
6
Meta-analysis of the Placebo and Nocebo effects associated with Placebo treatment in randomized trials of lipid-lowering therapies.降脂治疗随机试验中安慰剂效应和反安慰剂效应的荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2023 Aug 7;9(5):511-519. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcac060.
7
Nocebo in Alzheimer's disease; meta-analysis of placebo-controlled clinical trials.阿尔茨海默病中的反安慰剂效应;安慰剂对照临床试验的荟萃分析
J Neurol Sci. 2015 Aug 15;355(1-2):94-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2015.05.029. Epub 2015 May 28.
8
Oral Janus kinase inhibitors for maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis.用于维持溃疡性结肠炎缓解的口服 Janus 激酶抑制剂
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 27;1(1):CD012381. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012381.pub2.
9
Nocebo response in dentistry: A systematic review and meta-analysis of adverse events in analgesic trials of third molar removal.牙科中的反安慰剂效应:拔除第三磨牙镇痛试验中不良反应的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Oral Rehabil. 2023 Apr;50(4):332-342. doi: 10.1111/joor.13414. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
10
Comparative effectiveness and safety of non-tumour necrosis factor biologics and Janus kinase inhibitors in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis showing insufficient response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.在对肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂反应不足的活动性类风湿关节炎患者中,非肿瘤坏死因子生物制剂和 Janus 激酶抑制剂的比较有效性和安全性:一项随机对照试验的贝叶斯网络荟萃分析
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2021 Aug;46(4):984-992. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13380. Epub 2021 Feb 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic review of Janus kinases inhibitors for rheumatoid arthritis: methodology, reporting, and quality of evidence evaluation.类风湿关节炎的Janus激酶抑制剂系统评价:方法、报告及证据评估质量
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Sep 25;15:1459511. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1459511. eCollection 2024.
2
Optimizing the reporting and conduct of systematic literature reviews and meta-analyses.优化系统文献综述和荟萃分析的报告与实施。
Z Rheumatol. 2023 Mar;82(2):175-176. doi: 10.1007/s00393-023-01329-2. Epub 2023 Jan 23.