• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在用于胃肠-脑相互作用障碍的神经调节药物试验中研究反安慰剂效应。

Examining the Nocebo Effect in Trials of Neuromodulators for Use in Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction.

作者信息

Glissen Brown Jeremy R, Sanayei Ava, Proctor Samantha, Flanagan Ryan, Ballou Sarah, Bain Paul A, Nee Judy

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Department of Internal Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 2023 Apr 1;118(4):692-701. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002108. Epub 2022 Dec 23.

DOI:10.14309/ajg.0000000000002108
PMID:36563308
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Nocebo effects are believed to influence the rate of reported adverse events (AE) and subject withdrawal in both the treatment and placebo groups of randomized clinical trials (RCT). Neuromodulators are commonly prescribed to treat disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI), but adherence to these medications is often limited by side effects such as headache, dry mouth, fatigue, and altered bowel habits. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the proportion and risk difference of patients who experienced side effects leading to withdrawal in the placebo arm vs the treatment arm of RCT of neuromodulators for DGBI. We also sought to estimate the risk of developing any AE in the placebo arm of these studies and the rate of specific individual AEs.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials Searches to identify RCT that included terms for DGBI and for commonly prescribed neuromodulators. We calculated pooled proportions of patients experiencing an AE leading to withdrawal in the active treatment group vs the placebo group with 95% confidence intervals (CI), the pooled proportions of patients experiencing any AE, the pooled proportions of patients experiencing specific AE such as dizziness and headache, the pooled proportions of patients experiencing severe AE, and corresponding pooled risk differences with 95% CI.

RESULTS

There were 30 RCT included representing 2,284 patients with DGBI. Twenty-seven RCT reported data on AE leading to withdrawal. The pooled proportion of total patients with AE leading to withdrawal in the placebo group was 4% (95% CI 0.02-0.04). The pooled proportion of patients with AE leading to withdrawal who received neuromodulators was 9% (95% CI 0.06-0.13). In the 12 studies reporting data on patients experiencing at least 1 AE, the pooled proportion of patients experiencing any AE in the placebo group was 18% (95% CI 0.08-0.30), compared with 43% (95% CI 0.24-0.63) in the neuromodulator group. Thus, approximately 44% of the rate of withdrawal (0.04/0.09) and 42% of the rate reporting any side effects (0.18/0.43) in the neuromodulator group may be attributed to nocebo effects in the right context. Subgroup analysis by sex, medication class, risk of bias, and specific DGBI revealed differing withdrawal rates. There was no statistically significant difference in patients experiencing individual AE of dizziness, headache, or diarrhea. Rates of dry mouth, fatigue, and constipation were higher in treatment groups compared with those in placebo groups.

DISCUSSION

Patients with DGBI in RCT randomized to placebo groups frequently experience AE and AE that lead to withdrawal consistent with a strong nocebo effect. Nonspecific AE such as dizziness, headaches, and diarrhea occurred similarly in patients receiving placebo compared with those receiving neuromodulators.

摘要

引言

人们认为,在随机临床试验(RCT)的治疗组和安慰剂组中,反安慰剂效应会影响不良事件(AE)的报告率和受试者退出率。神经调节剂常用于治疗肠-脑互动障碍(DGBI),但这些药物的依从性常常受到副作用的限制,如头痛、口干、疲劳和排便习惯改变。我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估在针对DGBI的神经调节剂RCT中,安慰剂组与治疗组中因副作用导致退出的患者比例和风险差异。我们还试图估计这些研究中安慰剂组发生任何AE的风险以及特定个体AE的发生率。

方法

我们检索了MEDLINE、Embase、科学网核心合集和Cochrane对照试验中心注册库,以识别包含DGBI术语和常用神经调节剂术语的RCT。我们计算了活性治疗组与安慰剂组中因AE导致退出的患者的合并比例,并给出95%置信区间(CI),经历任何AE的患者的合并比例,经历头晕和头痛等特定AE的患者的合并比例,经历严重AE的患者的合并比例,以及相应的合并风险差异和95%CI。

结果

纳入了30项RCT,共2284例DGBI患者。27项RCT报告了因AE导致退出的数据。安慰剂组中因AE导致退出的患者的合并比例为4%(95%CI 0.02 - 0.04)。接受神经调节剂治疗且因AE导致退出的患者的合并比例为9%(95%CI 0.06 - 0.13)。在12项报告了至少经历1次AE的患者数据的研究中,安慰剂组中经历任何AE的患者的合并比例为18%(95%CI 0.08 - 0.30),而神经调节剂组为43%(95%CI 0.24 - 0.63)。因此,在适当的情况下,神经调节剂组中约44%的退出率(0.04/0.09)和42%的报告任何副作用的发生率(0.18/0.43)可能归因于反安慰剂效应。按性别、药物类别、偏倚风险和特定DGBI进行的亚组分析显示了不同的退出率。在经历头晕、头痛或腹泻等个体AE方面,患者之间没有统计学上的显著差异。与安慰剂组相比,治疗组口干、疲劳和便秘的发生率更高。

讨论

在随机分配到安慰剂组的RCT中,DGBI患者经常经历AE以及与强烈反安慰剂效应一致的导致退出的AE。与接受神经调节剂的患者相比,接受安慰剂的患者中头晕、头痛和腹泻等非特异性AE的发生情况相似。

相似文献

1
Examining the Nocebo Effect in Trials of Neuromodulators for Use in Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction.在用于胃肠-脑相互作用障碍的神经调节药物试验中研究反安慰剂效应。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2023 Apr 1;118(4):692-701. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002108. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
2
Adverse events in trials of licensed drugs for irritable bowel syndrome with constipation or diarrhea: Systematic review and meta-analysis.治疗便秘型或腹泻型肠易激综合征的已获许可药物试验中的不良事件:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2022 Jun;34(6):e14279. doi: 10.1111/nmo.14279. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Placebo and nocebo responses in randomized controlled trials of Janus kinase inhibitor monotherapy for rheumatoid arthritis : A meta-analysis.安慰剂和反安慰剂反应在随机对照试验中的 Janus 激酶抑制剂单药治疗类风湿关节炎:一项荟萃分析。
Z Rheumatol. 2022 Jun;81(5):430-437. doi: 10.1007/s00393-021-00969-6. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
5
Adverse Events and Nocebo Effects in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.炎症性肠病中的不良事件和反安慰剂效应:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Crohns Colitis. 2019 Sep 19;13(9):1201-1216. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjz087.
6
Nocebo effects and influencing factors in the randomized clinical trials of chronic constipation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.安慰剂效应和影响因素在慢性便秘随机临床试验:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2024 Feb;36(2):e14708. doi: 10.1111/nmo.14708. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
7
Nocebo response in dentistry: A systematic review and meta-analysis of adverse events in analgesic trials of third molar removal.牙科中的反安慰剂效应:拔除第三磨牙镇痛试验中不良反应的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Oral Rehabil. 2023 Apr;50(4):332-342. doi: 10.1111/joor.13414. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
8
Safety, Tolerability, and Nocebo Phenomena During Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trials.经颅磁刺激的安全性、耐受性和反安慰剂现象:安慰剂对照临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neuromodulation. 2020 Apr;23(3):291-300. doi: 10.1111/ner.12946. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
9
Nocebo Response in the Pharmacological Management of Overactive Bladder: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.药物治疗过度膀胱的厌恶反应:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Urol Focus. 2021 Sep;7(5):1143-1156. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.10.010. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
10
Treatments for seizures in catamenial (menstrual-related) epilepsy.月经性(与月经相关)癫痫发作的治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 16;9(9):CD013225. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013225.pub3.