Glissen Brown Jeremy R, Sanayei Ava, Proctor Samantha, Flanagan Ryan, Ballou Sarah, Bain Paul A, Nee Judy
Division of Gastroenterology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Department of Internal Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2023 Apr 1;118(4):692-701. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002108. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
Nocebo effects are believed to influence the rate of reported adverse events (AE) and subject withdrawal in both the treatment and placebo groups of randomized clinical trials (RCT). Neuromodulators are commonly prescribed to treat disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI), but adherence to these medications is often limited by side effects such as headache, dry mouth, fatigue, and altered bowel habits. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the proportion and risk difference of patients who experienced side effects leading to withdrawal in the placebo arm vs the treatment arm of RCT of neuromodulators for DGBI. We also sought to estimate the risk of developing any AE in the placebo arm of these studies and the rate of specific individual AEs.
We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials Searches to identify RCT that included terms for DGBI and for commonly prescribed neuromodulators. We calculated pooled proportions of patients experiencing an AE leading to withdrawal in the active treatment group vs the placebo group with 95% confidence intervals (CI), the pooled proportions of patients experiencing any AE, the pooled proportions of patients experiencing specific AE such as dizziness and headache, the pooled proportions of patients experiencing severe AE, and corresponding pooled risk differences with 95% CI.
There were 30 RCT included representing 2,284 patients with DGBI. Twenty-seven RCT reported data on AE leading to withdrawal. The pooled proportion of total patients with AE leading to withdrawal in the placebo group was 4% (95% CI 0.02-0.04). The pooled proportion of patients with AE leading to withdrawal who received neuromodulators was 9% (95% CI 0.06-0.13). In the 12 studies reporting data on patients experiencing at least 1 AE, the pooled proportion of patients experiencing any AE in the placebo group was 18% (95% CI 0.08-0.30), compared with 43% (95% CI 0.24-0.63) in the neuromodulator group. Thus, approximately 44% of the rate of withdrawal (0.04/0.09) and 42% of the rate reporting any side effects (0.18/0.43) in the neuromodulator group may be attributed to nocebo effects in the right context. Subgroup analysis by sex, medication class, risk of bias, and specific DGBI revealed differing withdrawal rates. There was no statistically significant difference in patients experiencing individual AE of dizziness, headache, or diarrhea. Rates of dry mouth, fatigue, and constipation were higher in treatment groups compared with those in placebo groups.
Patients with DGBI in RCT randomized to placebo groups frequently experience AE and AE that lead to withdrawal consistent with a strong nocebo effect. Nonspecific AE such as dizziness, headaches, and diarrhea occurred similarly in patients receiving placebo compared with those receiving neuromodulators.
人们认为,在随机临床试验(RCT)的治疗组和安慰剂组中,反安慰剂效应会影响不良事件(AE)的报告率和受试者退出率。神经调节剂常用于治疗肠-脑互动障碍(DGBI),但这些药物的依从性常常受到副作用的限制,如头痛、口干、疲劳和排便习惯改变。我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估在针对DGBI的神经调节剂RCT中,安慰剂组与治疗组中因副作用导致退出的患者比例和风险差异。我们还试图估计这些研究中安慰剂组发生任何AE的风险以及特定个体AE的发生率。
我们检索了MEDLINE、Embase、科学网核心合集和Cochrane对照试验中心注册库,以识别包含DGBI术语和常用神经调节剂术语的RCT。我们计算了活性治疗组与安慰剂组中因AE导致退出的患者的合并比例,并给出95%置信区间(CI),经历任何AE的患者的合并比例,经历头晕和头痛等特定AE的患者的合并比例,经历严重AE的患者的合并比例,以及相应的合并风险差异和95%CI。
纳入了30项RCT,共2284例DGBI患者。27项RCT报告了因AE导致退出的数据。安慰剂组中因AE导致退出的患者的合并比例为4%(95%CI 0.02 - 0.04)。接受神经调节剂治疗且因AE导致退出的患者的合并比例为9%(95%CI 0.06 - 0.13)。在12项报告了至少经历1次AE的患者数据的研究中,安慰剂组中经历任何AE的患者的合并比例为18%(95%CI 0.08 - 0.30),而神经调节剂组为43%(95%CI 0.24 - 0.63)。因此,在适当的情况下,神经调节剂组中约44%的退出率(0.04/0.09)和42%的报告任何副作用的发生率(0.18/0.43)可能归因于反安慰剂效应。按性别、药物类别、偏倚风险和特定DGBI进行的亚组分析显示了不同的退出率。在经历头晕、头痛或腹泻等个体AE方面,患者之间没有统计学上的显著差异。与安慰剂组相比,治疗组口干、疲劳和便秘的发生率更高。
在随机分配到安慰剂组的RCT中,DGBI患者经常经历AE以及与强烈反安慰剂效应一致的导致退出的AE。与接受神经调节剂的患者相比,接受安慰剂的患者中头晕、头痛和腹泻等非特异性AE的发生情况相似。