• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Optimizing the reporting and conduct of systematic literature reviews and meta-analyses.

作者信息

Boyadzhieva Zhivana, Nielsen Sabrina Mai, Buttgereit Frank, Christensen Robin, Palmowski Andriko

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Germany.

Section for Biostatistics and Evidence-Based Research, The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Z Rheumatol. 2023 Mar;82(2):175-176. doi: 10.1007/s00393-023-01329-2. Epub 2023 Jan 23.

DOI:10.1007/s00393-023-01329-2
PMID:36683077
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Optimizing the reporting and conduct of systematic literature reviews and meta-analyses.优化系统文献综述和荟萃分析的报告与实施。
Z Rheumatol. 2023 Mar;82(2):175-176. doi: 10.1007/s00393-023-01329-2. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
2
Outcome choice and definition in systematic reviews leads to few eligible studies included in meta-analyses: a case study.系统评价中结局选择和定义导致纳入荟萃分析的合格研究较少：一项病例研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Feb 11;20(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-0898-2.
3
PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 解释和说明：系统评价报告的更新指南和范例。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n160. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n160.
4
PRISMA Reporting Guidelines for Meta-analyses and Systematic Reviews.系统评价与Meta分析的PRISMA报告指南。
JAMA Surg. 2021 Aug 1;156(8):789-790. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.0546.
5
Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach.系统评价的总结：伞状综述方法的方法学发展、实施与报告
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015 Sep;13(3):132-40. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000055.
6
Enhancing the Reporting of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Vascular Surgery: PRISMA 2020.加强血管外科系统评价和Meta分析的报告：PRISMA 2020
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021 Oct;62(4):664-666. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.06.010. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
7
Methodology and reporting quality of systematic review/meta-analysis of traditional Chinese medicine.中医药系统评价/荟萃分析的方法学与报告质量
J Altern Complement Med. 2007 Oct;13(8):797-805. doi: 10.1089/acm.2007.7195.
8
Critical appraisal of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a step-by-step guide for nephrologists.系统评价和荟萃分析的批判性评价：肾脏科医生的分步指南
Ren Fail. 2025 Dec;47(1):2476736. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2025.2476736. Epub 2025 Mar 26.
9
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明：系统评价报告的更新指南。
PLoS Med. 2021 Mar 29;18(3):e1003583. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003583. eCollection 2021 Mar.
10
How to Conduct a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: A Guide for Clinicians.如何进行系统评价和荟萃分析：临床医生指南。
Respir Care. 2023 Sep;68(9):1295-1308. doi: 10.4187/respcare.10971. Epub 2023 Apr 18.

本文引用的文献

1
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明：系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
2
Placebo and nocebo responses in randomized controlled trials of Janus kinase inhibitor monotherapy for rheumatoid arthritis : A meta-analysis.安慰剂和反安慰剂反应在随机对照试验中的 Janus 激酶抑制剂单药治疗类风湿关节炎：一项荟萃分析。
Z Rheumatol. 2022 Jun;81(5):430-437. doi: 10.1007/s00393-021-00969-6. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
3
Prevalence of Multiplicity and Appropriate Adjustments Among Cardiovascular Randomized Clinical Trials Published in Major Medical Journals.
主要医学期刊发表的心血管随机临床试验中多发性的流行情况和适当调整。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Apr 1;3(4):e203082. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3082.
4
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.《随机对照试验偏倚风险评估工具2：修订版》
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.
5
Association between prospective registration and overall reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study.前瞻性注册与系统评价的总体报告和方法学质量之间的关联：一项meta 流行病学研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Jan;93:45-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.10.012. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
6
Consensus on the Need for a Hierarchical List of Patient-reported Pain Outcomes for Metaanalyses of Knee Osteoarthritis Trials: An OMERACT Objective.关于为膝关节骨关节炎试验的荟萃分析制定患者报告疼痛结果分层列表必要性的共识：OMERACT目标。
J Rheumatol. 2015 Oct;42(10):1971-1975. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.141384. Epub 2015 May 1.
7
Multiple comparison procedures.多重比较程序。
JAMA. 2014 Aug 6;312(5):543-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.9440.
8
Evaluation of the endorsement of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement on the quality of published systematic review and meta-analyses.评价发表的系统评价和荟萃分析的质量对首选报告项目的系统评价和荟萃分析 (PRISMA) 声明的认可。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 26;8(12):e83138. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083138. eCollection 2013.
9
Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses.随机效应荟萃分析的解读
BMJ. 2011 Feb 10;342:d549. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d549.
10
Recommendations by Cochrane Review Groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies.Cochrane系统评价组关于研究中偏倚风险评估的建议。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008 Apr 21;8:22. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-22.