Chen Chung-Yao, Chen Chia-Ling
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung, Taiwan.
School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Nat Sci Sleep. 2021 Mar 2;13:283-290. doi: 10.2147/NSS.S301668. eCollection 2021.
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) increases risk of stroke recurrence and mortality in ischemic stroke patients. However, equivocal treatment effects warrant further categorization of post-stroke OSA for risk stratification and individualized treatment planning.
The study recruited 232 ischemic stroke patients with moderate-to-severe OSA admitted for inpatient rehabilitation consecutively. Latent class analysis was performed based on sex, age, smoking, daytime sleepiness, depression, obesity, sedative use, atrial fibrillation, diabetes, dyslipidemia, hypertension, recurrent stroke and dysphagia. The augmentation index, a marker of arterial stiffness, was measured by applanation tonometry.
A three-cluster model provided the best fit. Cluster 1 (n=84, 36.2%) was older in age, predominantly female, with the highest hypopnea index and prevalence of atrial fibrillation. Moreover, patients in Cluster 1 had significantly higher augmentation index than those in Cluster 2. Cluster 2 patients (N=80, 34.5%) were of older age, predominantly male, with the highest prevalence of depression, the lowest prevalence of hypertension and had the most normal body mass index (BMI). Additionally, Cluster 2 had less nocturnal hypoxia as compared to Cluster 3. Cluster 3 (n=68, 29.3%) was the youngest in age, predominantly male, with the highest BMI, cumulative risk score, and prevalence of dyslipidemia of the three clusters.
Post-stroke OSA can be categorized into three clinical phenotypes. Patients in Clusters 1 and 3 both had elevated cardiovascular risk and treatment can be based on their distinct characteristics. Patients in Cluster 2 had relatively lower risk of cardiovascular events and the benefits of OSA treatment requires further study.
阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)会增加缺血性中风患者中风复发和死亡的风险。然而,治疗效果不明确,因此有必要对中风后OSA进行进一步分类,以进行风险分层和制定个性化治疗方案。
该研究连续招募了232名因中度至重度OSA而入院接受住院康复治疗的缺血性中风患者。基于性别、年龄、吸烟、日间嗜睡、抑郁、肥胖、使用镇静剂、心房颤动、糖尿病、血脂异常、高血压、中风复发和吞咽困难进行潜在类别分析。通过压平式眼压测量法测量动脉僵硬度指标——增强指数。
三聚类模型拟合效果最佳。聚类1(n = 84,36.2%)年龄较大,以女性为主,呼吸暂停低通气指数最高,心房颤动患病率最高。此外,聚类1患者的增强指数显著高于聚类2患者。聚类2患者(N = 80,34.5%)年龄较大,以男性为主,抑郁症患病率最高,高血压患病率最低,体重指数(BMI)最正常。此外,与聚类3相比,聚类2的夜间低氧情况较少。聚类3(n = 68,29.3%)年龄最小,以男性为主,在三个聚类中BMI、累积风险评分和血脂异常患病率最高。
中风后OSA可分为三种临床表型。聚类1和聚类3中的患者心血管风险均升高,可根据其不同特征进行治疗。聚类2中的患者心血管事件风险相对较低,OSA治疗的益处需要进一步研究。