Acsa Igizeneza, Lilly Caroline Bebora, Philip Njeru Nyaga, Lucy Wanjiru Njagi
College of Agriculture and Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Veterinary Pathology,Microbiology and Parasitology, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Int J Microbiol. 2021 Feb 20;2021:8877675. doi: 10.1155/2021/8877675. eCollection 2021.
Disinfectants are regularly used for cleansing poultry slaughterhouses to control microorganisms. However, the microorganisms such as bacteria are developing resistance to disinfectant(s) and complicate control of bacterial infections. The aim of this study was, therefore, to determine disinfectant susceptibility/resistance patterns manifested by bacteria (to commonly used disinfectants), which were isolated from intestines of slaughtered indigenous chickens in Nairobi, Kenya. The method used was agar well diffusion, and the six disinfectants (their active ingredients are in brackets) tested were as follows: Kupacide (glutaraldehyde; benzalkonium chloride); TH4+ (didecyl dimethyl ammonium HCl; dioctyl dimethyl ammonium HCl; octyl decyldimethyl ammonium HCl; alkyl dimethyl ammonium HCl; and glutaraldehyde); Noro cleanse (glutaraldehyde; coco-benzyl-dimethyl-ammonium chloride); Dettol (chloroxylenol); Savlon (chlorhexidine gluconate; cetrimide; and N-propylalcohol); and Jik (sodium hypochlorite). At recommended user concentration by the manufacturer, isolates showed various resistance to the respective disinfectants. isolates were resistant to five of the tested disinfectants (Jik, TH4+, Noro cleanse, Dettol, and Kupacide); however, they were susceptible to Savlon; isolates were resistant to disinfectants to Jik and TH4+ and susceptible to the rest disinfectants; isolates were only resistant to Jik and susceptible to the remaining disinfectants. Some and isolates showed resistance to more than one disinfectant. This study has demonstrated resistance of the bacterial isolates to various disinfectants at recommended user concentrations, although some of them were susceptible at higher concentration(s) and lower concentrations. This will interfere with the cleansing of the respective premises, resulting in contaminated products, which may end-up causing disease in the humans consuming them. Hence, it is recommended that one ascertains the efficacy of respective disinfectant by carrying out disinfectant susceptibility testing to know the effective ones and the appropriate concentration to use.
消毒剂常用于家禽屠宰场的清洁,以控制微生物。然而,细菌等微生物正在对消毒剂产生耐药性,使细菌感染的控制变得复杂。因此,本研究的目的是确定从肯尼亚内罗毕屠宰的本地鸡肠道中分离出的细菌(对常用消毒剂)所表现出的消毒剂敏感性/耐药模式。所采用的方法是琼脂扩散法,测试的六种消毒剂(括号内为其活性成分)如下:库帕西德(戊二醛;苯扎氯铵);TH4+(二癸基二甲基氯化铵;二辛基二甲基氯化铵;辛基癸基二甲基氯化铵;烷基二甲基氯化铵;以及戊二醛);诺罗清洁剂(戊二醛;椰油苄基二甲基氯化铵);滴露(氯二甲酚);舒肤佳(葡萄糖酸洗必泰;西曲溴铵;以及正丙醇);以及洁而灭(次氯酸钠)。在制造商推荐的使用浓度下,分离株对各自的消毒剂表现出不同程度的耐药性。一些分离株对五种测试消毒剂(洁而灭、TH4+、诺罗清洁剂、滴露和库帕西德)耐药;然而,它们对舒肤佳敏感;一些分离株对洁而灭和TH4+耐药,对其余消毒剂敏感;一些分离株仅对洁而灭耐药,对其余消毒剂敏感。一些分离株对不止一种消毒剂耐药。本研究表明,尽管一些细菌分离株在较高浓度和较低浓度下敏感,但在推荐的使用浓度下,它们对各种消毒剂具有耐药性。这将干扰相应场所的清洁,导致产品受到污染,最终可能使食用这些产品的人患病。因此,建议通过进行消毒剂敏感性测试来确定各自消毒剂的功效,以了解有效的消毒剂及其合适的使用浓度。