• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在医学学士一年级学生中引入课堂质量圈及其对学生学习的影响。

Introduction of Class-room quality circles among 1 year MBBS students and its effect on students learning.

作者信息

Chutia Happy, Srivastava Tripti, Bhattacharyya Himashree

机构信息

Department of Biochemistry, North Eastern Indira Gandhi Regional Institute of Health and Medical Sciences, Shillong, Meghalaya, India.

MCI Nodal Centre for National Faculty Development, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.

出版信息

J Educ Health Promot. 2021 Jan 28;10:20. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_412_20. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_412_20
PMID:33688529
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7933705/
Abstract

AIM

The aim of this interventional study was to introduce classroom quality circles (QCs) among first-year MBBS students, to assess the effectiveness of QCs on learning experience of the students, and to evaluate the students' satisfaction level during the process of learning.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A problem pool was created through a questionnaire. The study was carried out in the department of biochemistry, for a period of 6 months. Student's quality circle (SQC) group of five students was created. Then, feedbacks were collected from students by SQC after every class/topic delivered, and fortnightly meeting was held between the SQC group and faculty members of the department, and issues were brought to focus depending on these feedbacks collected by them. Possible initiatives and improvements were done on teaching-learning strategies depending on the outcome of these discussions.

RESULTS

The effectiveness of SQC group was assessed by a pre-post questionnaire (Questionnaire-3) feedback from the students and scoring was done based on 5-point Likert scale. There was a statistically significant difference ( = 0.009) between the mean of pre-post questionnaire. To analyze the students' satisfaction level, a set of questionnaires were given to them and scoring was done. Thirty-four students agreed, 11 students were neutral, and 6 students were disagreed, that introduction of SQC was effective in solving their problems related to teaching and learning of biochemistry.

CONCLUSION

SQC creates an environment of student centric, fairness, student empowerment, improving solving skills. Implementation of student-generated feedback through introduction of SQC has improved the quality of the course as well as its delivery. It complements and supplements in achieving students intended learning outcome and hence may contribute to overall learning quality in the long run.

摘要

目的

本干预性研究旨在将课堂质量圈(QC)引入医学学士一年级学生中,评估质量圈对学生学习体验的有效性,并评估学生在学习过程中的满意度。

材料与方法

通过问卷调查创建问题库。该研究在生物化学系进行,为期6个月。创建了由五名学生组成的学生质量圈(SQC)小组。然后,SQC在每节课/每个主题讲授后收集学生的反馈,并在SQC小组和该系教师之间每两周举行一次会议,根据他们收集的这些反馈来聚焦问题。根据这些讨论的结果,对教学策略进行了可能的举措和改进。

结果

通过学生的前后问卷(问卷3)反馈评估SQC小组的有效性,并基于5点李克特量表进行评分。前后问卷的平均值之间存在统计学显著差异(P = 0.009)。为了分析学生的满意度水平,向他们发放了一组问卷并进行评分。34名学生表示同意,11名学生持中立态度,6名学生表示不同意,即引入SQC有效地解决了他们与生物化学教学相关的问题。

结论

SQC营造了以学生为中心、公平、赋予学生权力、提高解决问题能力的环境。通过引入SQC实施学生生成的反馈提高了课程质量及其授课质量。它在实现学生预期的学习成果方面起到了补充作用,因此从长远来看可能有助于整体学习质量的提高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0426/7933705/25226dd6d197/JEHP-10-20-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0426/7933705/aaaee0c378f6/JEHP-10-20-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0426/7933705/b3ff2cf669d8/JEHP-10-20-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0426/7933705/1d3021869960/JEHP-10-20-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0426/7933705/25226dd6d197/JEHP-10-20-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0426/7933705/aaaee0c378f6/JEHP-10-20-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0426/7933705/b3ff2cf669d8/JEHP-10-20-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0426/7933705/1d3021869960/JEHP-10-20-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0426/7933705/25226dd6d197/JEHP-10-20-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Introduction of Class-room quality circles among 1 year MBBS students and its effect on students learning.在医学学士一年级学生中引入课堂质量圈及其对学生学习的影响。
J Educ Health Promot. 2021 Jan 28;10:20. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_412_20. eCollection 2021.
2
Use of quality circles among first year medical students and impact on student satisfaction.一年级医学生中质量改进小组的使用及其对学生满意度的影响。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2002 Mar 23;132(11-12):143-7. doi: 10.4414/smw.2002.09899.
3
Introduction of Structured Feedback to Medical Undergraduate Students in the First Professional.向医学本科一年级专业学生引入结构化反馈
Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2021 Jan-Mar;11(1):21-26. doi: 10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_138_20. Epub 2021 Jan 26.
4
Introduction of active learning method in learning physiology by MBBS students.MBBS学生在生理学学习中引入主动学习方法。
Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2016 Jul-Sep;6(3):186-90. doi: 10.4103/2229-516X.186960.
5
Jigsaw Classroom: Perceptions of Students and Teachers.拼图教室:学生和教师的看法
Med Sci Educ. 2023 Jun 20;33(4):853-859. doi: 10.1007/s40670-023-01805-z. eCollection 2023 Aug.
6
Assessing Female Pharmacy Students' Satisfaction with Active Learning Techniques at King Saud University.评估沙特国王大学药学专业女生对主动学习技巧的满意度。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2021 Mar 31;12:319-327. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S284415. eCollection 2021.
7
Factors Influencing Student's Satisfaction in the Physiotherapy Education Program.影响物理治疗教育项目中学生满意度的因素。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2021 Feb 9;12:133-140. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S289134. eCollection 2021.
8
Team-based learning versus traditional didactic lectures in teaching clinical biochemistry at King Abdulaziz University; learning outcomes and student satisfaction.团队学习与传统讲授法在阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王大学临床生物化学教学中的比较;学习成果和学生满意度。
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2021 Jul;49(4):546-559. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21501. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
9
Implementation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation workshop in first MBBS.在医学学士一年级开展心肺复苏工作坊
Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2015 Aug;5(Suppl 1):S11-3. doi: 10.4103/2229-516X.162255.
10
Is learning outcome after team based learning influenced by gender and academic standing?基于团队的学习后的学习成果会受到性别和学业成绩的影响吗?
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2019 Jan;47(1):58-66. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21197. Epub 2018 Dec 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Use of quality circles among first year medical students and impact on student satisfaction.一年级医学生中质量改进小组的使用及其对学生满意度的影响。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2002 Mar 23;132(11-12):143-7. doi: 10.4414/smw.2002.09899.
2
Quality circles in the hospital setting: their current status and potential for the future.医院环境中的质量圈:其现状与未来潜力
Health Care Manage Rev. 1987 Winter;12(1):55-9.