• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较疑似乳腺癌患者年龄和预测多变量模型的紧急转诊过程。

Comparison of the urgent referral for suspected breast cancer process with patient age and a predictive multivariable model.

机构信息

Primrose Breast Care Centre, Derriford Hospital, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust,  UK.

出版信息

BJS Open. 2021 Mar 5;5(2). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraa023.

DOI:10.1093/bjsopen/zraa023
PMID:33688948
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7944494/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The urgent 2-week wait referral for suspected breast cancer system (U2WW) in the UK prioritizes primary care referrals to one-stop breast clinics as 'urgent' or 'choose and book' (C&B). The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of U2WW in discriminating cancer versus no cancer, and to consider alternative criteria.

METHODS

Clinical features elicited in primary care and demographics of consecutive female patients in a specialist breast clinic were collated at the time of consultation from May 2008 to July 2017. U2WW was compared with patient age alone and a multivariable model in terms of accuracy and net cost for eight underlying cost-benefit assumptions.

RESULTS

There were 7915 eligible referrals: 4877 urgent (61.6 per cent) and 3038 C&B (38.4 per cent) referrals. Breast cancer was diagnosed in 546 patients (6.9 per cent): 491 (10.1 per cent) in urgent and 55 (1.8 per cent) in C&B referrals (P < 0.001). The multivariable model summated the significant variables: age (odds ratio (OR) 1.07, 95 per cent c.i. 1.07 to 1.08), tumour (OR 4.85, 3.62 to 6.52), observed change (OR 1.73, 1.34 to 2.23), pain (OR 0.46, 0.35 to 0.61) and gravidity (OR 0.72, 0.54 to 0.95). The area under the curve was 0.651 for U2WW, 0.784 for age alone, and 0.824 for the multivariable model (P <0.001 for all comparisons). Considering the cost assumptions, age alone and the multivariable model were either more accurate than U2WW, or as accurate but less costly.

CONCLUSION

The U2WW is surpassed by patient age as a single referral criterion. A multivariable model based on demographics and simple clinical features outperformed both. The continued use of the U2WW needs to be reconsidered.

摘要

背景

英国的两周紧急就诊预约系统(U2WW)将疑似乳腺癌的初级保健转诊分为“紧急”或“选择和预约”(C&B)。本研究旨在评估 U2WW 区分癌症与非癌症的准确性,并考虑替代标准。

方法

2008 年 5 月至 2017 年 7 月,在专家乳腺诊所就诊时,连续收集女性患者的临床特征和人口统计学数据。根据 8 种潜在成本效益假设,U2WW 与患者年龄单独和多变量模型在准确性和净成本方面进行了比较。

结果

共有 7915 例合格转诊:4877 例紧急(61.6%)和 3038 例 C&B(38.4%)转诊。546 例患者诊断为乳腺癌(6.9%):紧急转诊 491 例(10.1%),C&B 转诊 55 例(1.8%)(P<0.001)。多变量模型汇总了显著变量:年龄(比值比(OR)1.07,95%置信区间(CI)1.07 至 1.08)、肿瘤(OR 4.85,3.62 至 6.52)、观察到的变化(OR 1.73,1.34 至 2.23)、疼痛(OR 0.46,0.35 至 0.61)和生育能力(OR 0.72,0.54 至 0.95)。U2WW 的曲线下面积为 0.651,年龄单独的曲线下面积为 0.784,多变量模型的曲线下面积为 0.824(所有比较均 P<0.001)。考虑到成本假设,年龄单独和多变量模型要么比 U2WW 更准确,要么同样准确但成本更低。

结论

U2WW 作为单一转诊标准被患者年龄所超越。基于人口统计学和简单临床特征的多变量模型表现优于两者。需要重新考虑继续使用 U2WW。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35da/7944494/63674d198e07/zraa023f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35da/7944494/06fceaaf4b4d/zraa023f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35da/7944494/63674d198e07/zraa023f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35da/7944494/06fceaaf4b4d/zraa023f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35da/7944494/63674d198e07/zraa023f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of the urgent referral for suspected breast cancer process with patient age and a predictive multivariable model.比较疑似乳腺癌患者年龄和预测多变量模型的紧急转诊过程。
BJS Open. 2021 Mar 5;5(2). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraa023.
2
Impact of the '2 week wait' directive for suspected cancer on service provision in a symptomatic breast clinic.“两周等待”指令对疑似癌症患者的影响:在有症状乳腺门诊的服务提供情况
Br J Surg. 2000 Aug;87(8):1082-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01551.x.
3
One stop breast clinics--victims of their own success? A prospective audit of referrals to a specialist breast clinic.一站式乳腺诊所——自身成功的受害者?对一家专科乳腺诊所转诊情况的前瞻性审计。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2000 Aug;26(5):452-4. doi: 10.1053/ejso.1999.0920.
4
Two-week rule: has prioritisation of breast referrals by general practitioners improved?两周就诊规则:全科医生对乳腺转诊的优先排序是否有所改善?
Breast. 2006 Oct;15(5):654-8. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2006.02.002. Epub 2006 Mar 31.
5
Two week wait referral criteria - heading in the right direction?两周等待转诊标准——方向正确吗?
J Laryngol Otol. 2019 Aug;133(8):704-712. doi: 10.1017/S002221511900149X. Epub 2019 Aug 2.
6
Urgent suspected cancer referrals from general practice: audit of compliance with guidelines and referral outcomes.基层医疗紧急疑似癌症转诊:对指南遵循情况和转诊结果的审计。
Br J Gen Pract. 2011 Nov;61(592):e700-6. doi: 10.3399/bjgp11X606591.
7
Has the breast cancer 'two week wait' guarantee for assessment made any difference?乳腺癌“两周等待”评估保障措施有效果吗?
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2000 Sep;26(6):536-9. doi: 10.1053/ejso.2000.0942.
8
Referral patterns, clinical examination and the two-week-rule for breast cancer: a cohort study.乳腺癌的转诊模式、临床检查及两周法则:一项队列研究。
Ulster Med J. 2011 May;80(2):68-71.
9
Under utilisation of the 2-week wait initiative for lung cancer by primary care and its effect on the urgent referral pathway.初级医疗对肺癌两周等待计划的利用不足及其对紧急转诊途径的影响。
Br J Cancer. 2005 Oct 17;93(8):905-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602798.
10
Audit of referral practice to a fast-access breast clinic before the guaranteed 2-week wait.在保证两周等待期之前对快速通道乳腺诊所转诊实践的审核。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2001 Jan;83(1):58-60.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficiency Assessment of Breast Clinics for Patients Under 35: A Comparative Analysis of Targeted Models in a University Hospital.35岁以下患者乳腺诊所的效率评估:大学医院靶向模型的比较分析
Cureus. 2024 Feb 18;16(2):e54428. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54428. eCollection 2024 Feb.
2
Use of artificial intelligence to identify patients to be assessed in a breast clinic on 2-week wait: a retrospective cohort study.利用人工智能识别乳腺门诊需在两周内接受评估的患者:一项回顾性队列研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 Sep 27;85(11):5459-5463. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001293. eCollection 2023 Nov.
3
A Study Evaluating the Accuracy of Triage for Breast Referrals During the Covid-19 Pandemic in a Tertiary Hospital.

本文引用的文献

1
Rethinking primary care's gatekeeper role.重新审视初级保健的守门人角色。
BMJ. 2016 Sep 23;354:i4803. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4803.
2
Risk of breast cancer in symptomatic women in primary care: a case-control study using electronic records.基层医疗中有症状女性患乳腺癌的风险:一项利用电子记录的病例对照研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Dec;64(629):e788-93. doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X682873.
3
The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review.乳腺癌筛查的益处与危害:一项独立综述。
一项评估三级医院在新冠疫情期间乳腺转诊分诊准确性的研究。
Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2023 Aug 16;4(1):409-414. doi: 10.1089/whr.2023.0021. eCollection 2023.
4
An exploratory assessment of the impact of a novel risk assessment test on breast cancer clinic waiting times and workflow: a discrete event simulation model.一项关于新型风险评估测试对乳腺癌诊所候诊时间和工作流程影响的探索性评估:离散事件模拟模型
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Oct 29;22(1):1301. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08665-0.
Br J Cancer. 2013 Jun 11;108(11):2205-40. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.177. Epub 2013 Jun 6.
4
Referral patterns, clinical examination and the two-week-rule for breast cancer: a cohort study.乳腺癌的转诊模式、临床检查及两周法则:一项队列研究。
Ulster Med J. 2011 May;80(2):68-71.
5
Identifying suspected breast cancer: development and validation of a clinical prediction rule.鉴别疑似乳腺癌:临床预测规则的制定与验证。
Br J Gen Pract. 2011 May;61(586):e205-14. doi: 10.3399/bjgp11X572391.
6
The size of the prize for earlier diagnosis of cancer in England.英格兰早期诊断癌症的奖励金额有多大。
Br J Cancer. 2009 Dec 3;101 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S125-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605402.
7
Characterizing breast symptoms in family practice.在家庭医疗中对乳房症状进行特征描述。
Ann Fam Med. 2008 Nov-Dec;6(6):528-33. doi: 10.1370/afm.905.
8
Fast track referral for cancer.癌症快速转诊
BMJ. 2007 Aug 11;335(7614):267-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39293.453090.AD.
9
The effect of changes in tumor size on breast carcinoma survival in the U.S.: 1975-1999.肿瘤大小变化对美国乳腺癌患者生存情况的影响:1975年至1999年
Cancer. 2005 Sep 15;104(6):1149-57. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21285.
10
The paths from research to improved health outcomes.从研究到改善健康结果的途径。
Evid Based Nurs. 2005 Apr;8(2):36-8. doi: 10.1136/ebn.8.2.36.