Suppr超能文献

艰难梭菌诊断方法改变前后的趋势。

Trends in Clostridioides difficile diagnosis before and after a change in testing algorithm.

机构信息

Department of Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

Department of General Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

J Microbiol Methods. 2021 May;184:106189. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2021.106189. Epub 2021 Mar 6.

Abstract

Clostridioides difficile (Clostridium difficile) (CD) infection remains a challenging diagnosis in hospitalized patients given the myriad of testing procedures and array of alternative causes for diarrhea. We identified 100 consecutive inpatients with positive CD testing in a single tertiary center before and after changing from nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) alone to a two-step algorithm involving Glutamate Dehydrogenase enzyme immunoassays (GDHEIA) followed by an enzyme immunoassay for CD toxins (EIA). Detailed clinical information was obtained retrospectively to assess for risk factors, clinical features, and treatment outcomes to correlate test results with clinical cases. We demonstrate that using a 2-step testing algorithm identifies patients with a consistent clinical illness for CD disease significantly more often than nucleic acid amplification testing alone without an increase in cases of severe CD disease. Our data suggest that NAAT alone results in an increase in unnecessary treatment of CD colonization.

摘要

艰难梭菌(Clostridium difficile)(CD)感染仍然是住院患者的一个具有挑战性的诊断,因为有许多检测程序和腹泻的替代原因。在将检测方法从单纯的核酸扩增检测(NAAT)改为两步法,即谷氨酸脱氢酶酶免疫分析(GDHEIA)后,我们在一家三级中心连续检测了 100 例阳性 CD 的住院患者,然后再检测。随后进行 CD 毒素酶免疫分析(EIA)。我们回顾性地获得详细的临床信息,以评估危险因素、临床特征和治疗结果,将检测结果与临床病例相关联。我们证明,使用两步检测算法比单纯使用核酸扩增检测更能准确识别出具有一致临床疾病的 CD 疾病患者,而不会增加严重 CD 疾病的病例。我们的数据表明,单纯的 NAAT 会导致对 CD 定植的不必要治疗增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验