Hocking Lucy, Wilcox Mark, Petrosillo Nicola, Griffin Paul, Steiner Theodore, Attara Gail, Doré Joel, Cabling Mark, Stockwell Stephanie, Romanelli Robert J, Marjanovic Sonja
RAND Europe, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Jan 12;9:1033417. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1033417. eCollection 2022.
Arriving at a infection (CDI) diagnosis, treating patients and dealing with recurrences is not straightforward, but a comprehensive and well-rounded understanding of what is needed to improve patient care is lacking. This manuscript addresses the paucity of multidisciplinary perspectives that consider clinical practice related and healthcare system-related challenges to optimizing care delivery.
We draw on narrative review, consultations with clinical experts and patient representatives, and a survey of 95 clinical and microbiology experts from the UK, France, Italy, Australia and Canada, adding novel multi-method evidence to the knowledge base.
We examine the patient pathway and variations in clinical practice and identify, synthesize insights on and discuss associated challenges. Examples of key challenges include the need to conduct multiple tests for a conclusive diagnosis, treatment side-effects, the cost of some antibiotics and barriers to access of fecal microbiota transplantation, difficulties in distinguishing recurrence from new infection, workforce capacity constraints to effective monitoring of patients on treatment and of recurrence, and ascertaining whether a patient has been cured. We also identify key opportunities and priorities for improving patient care that target both clinical practice and the wider healthcare system. While there is some variety across surveyed countries' healthcare systems, there is also strong agreement on some priorities. Key improvement actions seen as priorities by at least half of survey respondents in at least three of the five surveyed countries include: developing innovative products for both preventing (Canada, Australia, UK, Italy, and France) and treating (Canada, Australia, and Italy) recurrences; facilitating more multidisciplinary patient care (UK, Australia, and France); updating diagnosis and treatment guidelines (Australia, Canada, and UK); and educating and supporting professionals in primary care (Italy, UK, Canada, and Australia) and those in secondary care who are not CDI experts (Italy, Australia, and France) on identifying symptoms and managing patients. Finally, we discuss key evidence gaps for a future research agenda.
做出艰难梭菌感染(CDI)的诊断、治疗患者并应对复发情况并非易事,而且目前缺乏对改善患者护理所需条件的全面且完善的理解。本手稿探讨了多学科观点的匮乏,这些观点应考虑到与临床实践相关以及与医疗保健系统相关的优化护理提供方面的挑战。
我们采用叙述性综述、与临床专家和患者代表进行磋商,并对来自英国、法国、意大利、澳大利亚和加拿大的95位临床和微生物学专家进行了调查,为知识库增添了新的多方法证据。
我们研究了患者就医流程及临床实践中的差异,识别、综合相关见解并讨论了相关挑战。关键挑战的例子包括:为得出确定性诊断需要进行多项检测、治疗副作用、某些抗生素的成本以及粪便微生物群移植的获取障碍、区分复发与新感染的困难、有效监测接受治疗患者及复发情况的劳动力能力限制,以及确定患者是否已治愈。我们还确定了改善患者护理的关键机遇和优先事项,这些机遇和优先事项同时针对临床实践和更广泛的医疗保健系统。虽然被调查国家的医疗保健系统存在一些差异,但在某些优先事项上也有强烈共识。在五个被调查国家中至少三个国家里,至少一半的调查受访者认为是优先事项的关键改进行动包括:开发用于预防(加拿大、澳大利亚、英国、意大利和法国)和治疗(加拿大、澳大利亚和意大利)复发的创新产品;促进更多的多学科患者护理(英国、澳大利亚和法国);更新诊断和治疗指南(澳大利亚、加拿大和英国);以及对初级保健(意大利、英国、加拿大和澳大利亚)的专业人员以及二级保健中并非CDI专家的人员(意大利、澳大利亚和法国)进行关于识别症状和管理患者的教育与支持。最后,我们讨论了未来研究议程的关键证据空白。