Suppr超能文献

印度尼西亚万隆一家三级医院的 COVID-19 诊断用即时抗体检测的表现。

The performance of point-of-care antibody test for COVID-19 diagnosis in a tertiary hospital in Bandung, Indonesia.

机构信息

Division of Parasitology, Department of Biomedical Science, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia.

Infectious Disease Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung Indonesia.

出版信息

J Infect Dev Ctries. 2021 Mar 7;15(2):237-241. doi: 10.3855/jidc.13370.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

We aim to describe the performance of combined IgM and IgG point-of-care antibody test (POC-Ab) (Wondfo®) compared to real-time reverse transcriptase (rRT-PCR) (Allplex™ 2019-nCoV Assay) in detecting coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

METHODOLOGY

We compared POC-Ab with rRT-PCR results among patients in a tertiary hospital from January to March 2020 in Bandung, Indonesia. We selected presumptive COVID-19 patients with positive rRT-PCR consecutively and 20 patients with negative rRT-PCR results were selected randomly from the same group of patients as controls. We described the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) with corresponding 95% confidence interval using serum and capillary blood samples. We also tested POC-Ab using non-COVID-19 (confirmed dengue and typhoid) patients' sera.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients with positive rRT-PCR result and 20 negative controls were included (68.1% males, mean age 46 (SD: 15.4)). Using the serum, the sensitivity of the POC-Ab was 63.0% (42.4-80.6), specificity was 95.0% (75.1-99.9), PPV was 94.4% (72.7-99.8), NPV was 65.5% (45.7-82.1). A subset of 20 patients was tested using a capillary blood sample. The accuracy of the capillary blood sample is lower compared to serum (50.0% vs. 78.7%). None of the non-COVID-19 sera tested were reactive.

CONCLUSIONS

POC-Ab for COVID-19 has a high specificity with no false-positive result in non-COVID-19 sera. Therefore, it can be used to guide diagnostic among symptomatic patients in resource limited settings. Given its low sensitivity, patients with high suspicion of COVID-19 but non-reactive result should be prioritized for rRT-PCR testing.

摘要

简介

本研究旨在描述即时检测抗体(POC-Ab)(万孚®)联合检测与实时逆转录聚合酶链反应(rRT-PCR)(Allplex™ 2019-nCoV 检测试剂盒)在检测 2019 冠状病毒病(COVID-19)中的表现。

方法

我们比较了 2020 年 1 月至 3 月期间在印度尼西亚万隆的一家三级医院中患者的 POC-Ab 与 rRT-PCR 结果。我们连续选择了 rRT-PCR 阳性的疑似 COVID-19 患者,并且从同一组患者中随机选择了 20 例 rRT-PCR 阴性的患者作为对照。我们使用血清和毛细血管血样本描述了敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)及其相应的 95%置信区间。我们还使用非 COVID-19(确诊登革热和伤寒)患者的血清测试了 POC-Ab。

结果

共纳入 27 例 rRT-PCR 阳性患者和 20 例阴性对照(68.1%为男性,平均年龄 46 岁[SD:15.4])。使用血清,POC-Ab 的敏感性为 63.0%(42.4-80.6),特异性为 95.0%(75.1-99.9),PPV 为 94.4%(72.7-99.8),NPV 为 65.5%(45.7-82.1)。其中 20 例患者的部分样本使用毛细血管血进行了检测。与血清相比,毛细血管血样本的准确性较低(50.0% vs. 78.7%)。在非 COVID-19 血清中未检测到任何阳性反应。

结论

POC-Ab 用于 COVID-19 具有高特异性,在非 COVID-19 血清中无假阳性结果。因此,它可以用于资源有限的情况下指导有症状患者的诊断。鉴于其敏感性较低,对于高度疑似 COVID-19 但无反应的患者,应优先进行 rRT-PCR 检测。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验