Division of Parasitology, Department of Biomedical Science, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia.
Infectious Disease Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung Indonesia.
J Infect Dev Ctries. 2021 Mar 7;15(2):237-241. doi: 10.3855/jidc.13370.
We aim to describe the performance of combined IgM and IgG point-of-care antibody test (POC-Ab) (Wondfo®) compared to real-time reverse transcriptase (rRT-PCR) (Allplex™ 2019-nCoV Assay) in detecting coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
We compared POC-Ab with rRT-PCR results among patients in a tertiary hospital from January to March 2020 in Bandung, Indonesia. We selected presumptive COVID-19 patients with positive rRT-PCR consecutively and 20 patients with negative rRT-PCR results were selected randomly from the same group of patients as controls. We described the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) with corresponding 95% confidence interval using serum and capillary blood samples. We also tested POC-Ab using non-COVID-19 (confirmed dengue and typhoid) patients' sera.
Twenty-seven patients with positive rRT-PCR result and 20 negative controls were included (68.1% males, mean age 46 (SD: 15.4)). Using the serum, the sensitivity of the POC-Ab was 63.0% (42.4-80.6), specificity was 95.0% (75.1-99.9), PPV was 94.4% (72.7-99.8), NPV was 65.5% (45.7-82.1). A subset of 20 patients was tested using a capillary blood sample. The accuracy of the capillary blood sample is lower compared to serum (50.0% vs. 78.7%). None of the non-COVID-19 sera tested were reactive.
POC-Ab for COVID-19 has a high specificity with no false-positive result in non-COVID-19 sera. Therefore, it can be used to guide diagnostic among symptomatic patients in resource limited settings. Given its low sensitivity, patients with high suspicion of COVID-19 but non-reactive result should be prioritized for rRT-PCR testing.
本研究旨在描述即时检测抗体(POC-Ab)(万孚®)联合检测与实时逆转录聚合酶链反应(rRT-PCR)(Allplex™ 2019-nCoV 检测试剂盒)在检测 2019 冠状病毒病(COVID-19)中的表现。
我们比较了 2020 年 1 月至 3 月期间在印度尼西亚万隆的一家三级医院中患者的 POC-Ab 与 rRT-PCR 结果。我们连续选择了 rRT-PCR 阳性的疑似 COVID-19 患者,并且从同一组患者中随机选择了 20 例 rRT-PCR 阴性的患者作为对照。我们使用血清和毛细血管血样本描述了敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)及其相应的 95%置信区间。我们还使用非 COVID-19(确诊登革热和伤寒)患者的血清测试了 POC-Ab。
共纳入 27 例 rRT-PCR 阳性患者和 20 例阴性对照(68.1%为男性,平均年龄 46 岁[SD:15.4])。使用血清,POC-Ab 的敏感性为 63.0%(42.4-80.6),特异性为 95.0%(75.1-99.9),PPV 为 94.4%(72.7-99.8),NPV 为 65.5%(45.7-82.1)。其中 20 例患者的部分样本使用毛细血管血进行了检测。与血清相比,毛细血管血样本的准确性较低(50.0% vs. 78.7%)。在非 COVID-19 血清中未检测到任何阳性反应。
POC-Ab 用于 COVID-19 具有高特异性,在非 COVID-19 血清中无假阳性结果。因此,它可以用于资源有限的情况下指导有症状患者的诊断。鉴于其敏感性较低,对于高度疑似 COVID-19 但无反应的患者,应优先进行 rRT-PCR 检测。