• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哪些癌症研究成为新闻热点?对提及癌症研究的在线新闻报道的定量分析。

What cancer research makes the news? A quantitative analysis of online news stories that mention cancer studies.

机构信息

Department of Journalism, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, California, United States of America.

John D. Bower School of Population Health, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Mar 10;16(3):e0247553. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247553. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0247553
PMID:33690639
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7946182/
Abstract

Journalists' health and science reporting aid the public's direct access to research through the inclusion of hyperlinks leading to original studies in peer-reviewed journals. While this effort supports the US-government mandate that research be made widely available, little is known about what research journalists share with the public. This cross-sectional exploratory study characterises US-government-funded research on cancer that appeared most frequently in news coverage and how that coverage varied by cancer type, disease incidence and mortality rates. The subject of analysis was 11436 research articles (published in 2016) on cancer funded by the US government and 642 news stories mentioning at least one of these articles. Based on Altmetric data, researchers identified articles via PubMed and characterised each based on the news media attention received online. Only 1.88% (n = 213) of research articles mentioning US government-funded cancer research included at least one mention in an online news publication. This is in contrast to previous research that found 16.8% (n = 1925) of articles received mention by online mass media publications. Of the 13 most common cancers in the US, 12 were the subject of at least one news mention; only urinary and bladder cancer received no mention. Traditional news sources included significantly more mentions of research on common cancers than digital native news sources. However, a general discrepancy exists between cancers prominent in news sources and those with the highest mortality rate. For instance, lung cancer accounted for the most deaths annually, while melanoma led to 56% less annual deaths; however, journalists cited research regarding these cancers nearly equally. Additionally, breast cancer received the greatest coverage per estimated annual death, while pancreatic cancer received the least coverage per death. Findings demonstrated a continued misalignment between prevalent cancers and cancers mentioned in online news media. Additionally, cancer control and prevention received less coverage from journalists than other cancer continuum stages, highlighting a continued underrepresentation of prevention-focused research. Results revealed a need for further scholarship regarding the role of journalists in research dissemination.

摘要

新闻工作者的健康和科学报道通过包含指向同行评议期刊原始研究的超链接,帮助公众直接访问研究。虽然这一努力支持了美国政府的要求,即研究应广泛提供,但人们对新闻记者与公众分享的研究内容知之甚少。这项横断面探索性研究描述了在美国政府资助的癌症研究中,最常出现在新闻报道中的研究,以及这些报道如何因癌症类型、疾病发病率和死亡率的不同而有所不同。分析的主题是美国政府资助的癌症研究的 11436 篇研究文章(发表于 2016 年)和至少提到其中一篇文章的 642 篇新闻报道。根据 Altmetric 数据,研究人员通过 PubMed 确定了文章,并根据在线获得的媒体关注度对每篇文章进行了描述。只有 1.88%(n=213)的提到美国政府资助的癌症研究的研究文章至少在一篇在线新闻出版物中提到。这与之前的研究结果形成了对比,之前的研究发现 16.8%(n=1925)的文章被在线大众媒体出版物提及。在美国 13 种最常见的癌症中,有 12 种至少有一次被新闻报道提及;只有尿路和膀胱癌没有被提及。传统新闻来源对常见癌症的报道明显多于数字原生新闻来源。然而,在新闻来源中突出的癌症与死亡率最高的癌症之间存在一般差异。例如,肺癌每年导致的死亡人数最多,而黑色素瘤每年导致的死亡人数减少了 56%;然而,记者对这些癌症的研究引用几乎相同。此外,乳腺癌的报道量与每年估计的死亡人数成正比,而胰腺癌的报道量与死亡人数成反比。研究结果表明,流行癌症与在线新闻媒体中提到的癌症之间仍然存在错位。此外,癌症控制和预防在记者报道中所占比例低于癌症连续阶段的其他阶段,突出了预防为重点的研究仍然代表性不足。研究结果表明,需要进一步研究记者在研究传播中的作用。

相似文献

1
What cancer research makes the news? A quantitative analysis of online news stories that mention cancer studies.哪些癌症研究成为新闻热点?对提及癌症研究的在线新闻报道的定量分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 10;16(3):e0247553. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247553. eCollection 2021.
2
Making headlines: an analysis of US government-funded cancer research mentioned in online media.成为头条新闻:对在线媒体中提到的美国政府资助的癌症研究进行分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 19;9(2):e025783. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025783.
3
News media coverage of medication research: reporting pharmaceutical company funding and use of generic medication names.新闻媒体对药物研究的报道:报道制药公司的资金资助及通用药物名称的使用情况。
JAMA. 2008 Oct 1;300(13):1544-50. doi: 10.1001/jama.300.13.1544.
4
Influence of medical journal press releases on the quality of associated newspaper coverage: retrospective cohort study.医学期刊新闻稿对相关报纸报道质量的影响:回顾性队列研究。
BMJ. 2012 Jan 27;344:d8164. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d8164.
5
Journalists' Experiences with Using Nurses as Sources in Health News Stories.记者在健康新闻报道中以护士为消息来源的经历。
Am J Nurs. 2018 Oct;118(10):42-50. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000546380.66303.a2.
6
Earned media and public engagement with CDC's "Tips from Former Smokers" campaign: an analysis of online news and blog coverage.自有媒体与公众对美国疾病控制与预防中心“前吸烟者的小贴士”活动的参与:在线新闻与博客报道分析
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jan 20;17(1):e12. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3645.
7
Portrayal of complementary and alternative medicine for cancer by top online news sites.顶级在线新闻网站对癌症补充替代医学的描述。
J Altern Complement Med. 2012 May;18(5):487-93. doi: 10.1089/acm.2011.0110. Epub 2012 May 2.
8
Cancer in the news: Bias and quality in media reporting of cancer research.新闻中的癌症:媒体对癌症研究报道的偏见和质量。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 9;15(11):e0242133. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242133. eCollection 2020.
9
Frequently cited sources in cancer news coverage: a content analysis examining the relationship between cancer news content and source citation.癌症新闻报道中常被引用的来源:一项内容分析研究,探讨癌症新闻内容与来源引用之间的关系。
Cancer Causes Control. 2010 Jan;21(1):41-9. doi: 10.1007/s10552-009-9432-x. Epub 2009 Sep 26.
10
Calls to Action (Mobilizing Information) on Cancer in Online News: Content Analysis.呼吁行动(动员信息)癌症在线新闻:内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 21;23(6):e26019. doi: 10.2196/26019.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the Impact of Media Coverage of the NordICC Trial on Public Perspectives on Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening.评估北欧国际癌症中心(NordICC)试验的媒体报道对公众对结肠镜检查用于结直肠癌筛查观点的影响。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2025 Feb 6. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000002144.
2
Making science public: a review of journalists' use of Open Access research.让科学公开化:对记者使用开放获取研究的回顾。
F1000Res. 2024 Jan 2;12:512. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.133710.1. eCollection 2023.
3
Identifying science in the news: An assessment of the precision and recall of Altmetric.com news mention data.

本文引用的文献

1
Communicating Scientific Uncertainty in an Age of COVID-19: An Investigation into the Use of Preprints by Digital Media Outlets.在 COVID-19 时代传递科学不确定性:对数字媒体渠道使用预印本的调查。
Health Commun. 2022 May;37(6):726-738. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1864892. Epub 2021 Jan 3.
2
Social media and the modern scientist: a research primer for low- and middle-income countries.社交媒体与现代科学家:低收入和中等收入国家的研究入门指南
Afr J Emerg Med. 2020;10(Suppl 2):S120-S124. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2020.04.005. Epub 2020 May 25.
3
Changing times for science and the public: Science journalists' roles for the responsible communication of science.
识别新闻中的科学:对Altmetric.com新闻提及数据的精确率和召回率的评估。
Scientometrics. 2022;127(11):6109-6123. doi: 10.1007/s11192-022-04510-7. Epub 2022 Oct 1.
科学与公众的时代变化:科学记者在科学负责任传播中的角色
EMBO Rep. 2019 Apr;20(4). doi: 10.15252/embr.201947906. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
4
Making headlines: an analysis of US government-funded cancer research mentioned in online media.成为头条新闻:对在线媒体中提到的美国政府资助的癌症研究进行分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 19;9(2):e025783. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025783.
5
How Should Clinicians Respond When Patients Are Influenced by Celebrities' Cancer Stories?当患者受到名人抗癌故事的影响时,临床医生应如何应对?
AMA J Ethics. 2018 Nov 1;20(11):E1075-1081. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2018.1075.
6
Beyond journalism: Theorizing the transformation of journalism.超越新闻学:新闻学转型的理论化
Journalism (Lond). 2018 Feb;19(2):165-181. doi: 10.1177/1464884916688550. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
7
Getting the Word Out: New Approaches for Disseminating Public Health Science.传播知识:公共卫生科学传播的新途径。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2018 Mar/Apr;24(2):102-111. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000673.
8
Psilocybin produces substantial and sustained decreases in depression and anxiety in patients with life-threatening cancer: A randomized double-blind trial.裸盖菇素可使患有危及生命癌症的患者的抑郁和焦虑症状大幅且持续减轻:一项随机双盲试验。
J Psychopharmacol. 2016 Dec;30(12):1181-1197. doi: 10.1177/0269881116675513.
9
Rapid and sustained symptom reduction following psilocybin treatment for anxiety and depression in patients with life-threatening cancer: a randomized controlled trial.裸盖菇素治疗危及生命的癌症患者焦虑和抑郁后症状快速且持续缓解:一项随机对照试验
J Psychopharmacol. 2016 Dec;30(12):1165-1180. doi: 10.1177/0269881116675512.
10
Qualitative study of physicians' varied uses of biomedical research in the USA.美国医生对生物医学研究多种用途的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 21;6(11):e012846. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012846.