Deuze Mark, Witschge Tamara
University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
Journalism (Lond). 2018 Feb;19(2):165-181. doi: 10.1177/1464884916688550. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
Journalism has enjoyed a rich and relatively stable history of professionalization. Scholars coming from a variety of disciplines have theorized this history, forming a consistent body of knowledge codified in national and international handbooks and canonical readers. However, recent work and analysis suggest that the supposed core of journalism and the assumed consistency of the inner workings of news organizations are problematic starting points for journalism studies. In this article, we challenge the consensual (self-)presentation of journalism - in terms of its occupational ideology, its professional culture, and its sedimentation in routines and organizational structures (cf. the newsroom) in the context of its reconfiguration as a , , and way of working and of being at work. We outline a way beyond individualist or institutional approaches to do justice to the current complex transformation of the profession. We propose a framework to bring together these approaches in a dialectic attempt to move through and journalism as it has traditionally been conceptualized and practiced, allowing for a broader definition and understanding of the myriad of practices that make up journalism.
新闻学有着丰富且相对稳定的职业化历史。来自不同学科的学者对这段历史进行了理论化阐释，形成了一套在国家和国际手册以及权威读物中编纂的连贯知识体系。然而，近期的研究和分析表明，新闻学所谓的核心以及新闻机构内部运作假定的一致性，对于新闻学研究而言是存在问题的出发点。在本文中，我们在新闻学重新配置为一种[此处原文缺失三个并列的描述内容]工作方式和工作状态的背景下，从其职业意识形态、职业文化以及在日常工作和组织结构（如新闻编辑室）中的沉淀等方面，对新闻学的共识性（自我）呈现提出质疑。我们勾勒出一条超越个人主义或制度主义方法的路径，以公正地对待该职业当前的复杂转型。我们提出一个框架，将这些方法结合起来，进行辩证尝试，以审视并[此处原文缺失一个动词]传统概念化和实践中的新闻学，从而对构成新闻学的众多实践有更广泛的定义和理解。
