• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重建学院:在 COVID-19 期间及以后支持学术母亲。

Rebuild the Academy: Supporting academic mothers during COVID-19 and beyond.

机构信息

Departments of Earth and Environment, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Department of Biology, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS Biol. 2021 Mar 9;19(3):e3001100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001100. eCollection 2021 Mar.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001100
PMID:33690708
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7942998/
Abstract

The issues facing academic mothers have been discussed for decades. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is further exposing these inequalities as womxn scientists who are parenting while also engaging in a combination of academic related duties are falling behind. These inequities can be solved by investing strategically in solutions. Here we describe strategies that would ensure a more equitable academy for working mothers now and in the future. While the data are clear that mothers are being disproportionately impacted by COVID-19, many groups could benefit from these strategies. Rather than rebuilding what we once knew, let us be the architects of a new world.

摘要

学术母亲所面临的问题已经讨论了几十年。2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)进一步暴露了这些不平等现象,因为在从事学术相关工作的同时还要照顾孩子的女科学家们正在落后。通过战略性地投资于解决方案,可以解决这些不平等问题。在这里,我们描述了一些策略,这些策略将确保现在和未来的职业母亲拥有一个更加公平的学术环境。虽然数据清楚地表明,母亲受到 COVID-19 的不成比例的影响,但许多群体都可以从这些策略中受益。让我们不要重建我们曾经知道的世界,而是成为新世界的建筑师。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa98/7942998/088e9a5fe32e/pbio.3001100.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa98/7942998/088e9a5fe32e/pbio.3001100.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa98/7942998/088e9a5fe32e/pbio.3001100.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Rebuild the Academy: Supporting academic mothers during COVID-19 and beyond.重建学院:在 COVID-19 期间及以后支持学术母亲。
PLoS Biol. 2021 Mar 9;19(3):e3001100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001100. eCollection 2021 Mar.
2
Sexism is still a problem for German research.性别歧视在德国科研领域仍是个问题。
Nature. 2019 Mar;567(7749):S60-S62. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-00919-y.
3
Impact of COVID-19 on academic mothers.新冠疫情对身为母亲的学者的影响。
Science. 2020 May 15;368(6492):724. doi: 10.1126/science.abc2740.
4
COVID-19 gender policy changes support female scientists and improve research quality.新冠疫情相关性别政策的改变支持了女性科学家,并提高了研究质量。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Feb 9;118(6). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2023476118.
5
Africa's poorly kept science gender gap secrets.非洲科学领域性别差距的糟糕保密状况。
Lancet. 2019 Aug 3;394(10196):373-374. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31766-0.
6
The endangered physician-scientist and COVID-19.濒危的医师科学家和 COVID-19。
Cell Rep Med. 2021 Feb 16;2(2):100190. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2021.100190. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
7
An analysis of mother stress before and during COVID-19 pandemic: The case of China.新冠疫情前后母亲压力分析:中国案例。
Health Care Women Int. 2020 Nov-Dec;41(11-12):1349-1362. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2020.1841194. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
8
Q&A: Times are changing.问答:时代在变。
Nature. 2015 Apr 30;520(7549):S26-7. doi: 10.1038/520S26a.
9
Sexist attitudes: Most of us are biased.性别歧视态度:我们大多数人都有偏见。
Nature. 2013 Mar 7;495(7439):33-4. doi: 10.1038/495033a.
10
Dr Mom's Added Burden.当妈不易:育儿压力知多少
J Am Coll Radiol. 2021 Jan;18(1 Pt A):103-107. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.09.024. Epub 2020 Oct 5.

引用本文的文献

1
A retrospective analysis of the perceived impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on systemic barriers to success for university student parents.对新冠疫情对大学生家长成功的系统性障碍的感知影响的回顾性分析。
Front Educ (Lausanne). 2024;9. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2024.1256454. Epub 2024 Apr 7.
2
Supporting open science at PLOS Biology.支持 PLoS Biology 的开放科学。
PLoS Biol. 2024 Jan 29;22(1):e3002516. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002516. eCollection 2024 Jan.
3
A qualitative analysis of the impact of COVID-19 restrictions on gender biases in an Irish University.

本文引用的文献

1
Make equity essential to expedite change in academia.将公平性作为加快学术界变革的关键要素。
Nat Microbiol. 2021 Jan;6(1):7-8. doi: 10.1038/s41564-020-00845-0.
2
Gender Differences in Grant Submissions across Science and Engineering Fields at the NSF.美国国家科学基金会(NSF)资助申请在科学与工程领域中的性别差异
Bioscience. 2020 Jul 29;70(9):814-820. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biaa072. eCollection 2020 Sep.
3
The career cost of COVID-19 to female researchers, and how science should respond.新冠疫情对女性研究人员的职业代价,以及科学界应如何应对。
新冠疫情限制对爱尔兰大学性别偏见影响的定性分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 27;18(9):e0288467. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288467. eCollection 2023.
4
Overemphasis on publications may disadvantage historically excluded groups in STEM before and during COVID-19: A North American survey-based study.过分强调出版物可能会在 COVID-19 之前和期间使 STEM 领域中历史上被排斥的群体处于不利地位:一项基于北美调查的研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 27;18(9):e0291124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291124. eCollection 2023.
5
Ten simple rules for a mom-friendly Academia.妈妈友好型学术圈的 10 条法则
PLoS Comput Biol. 2023 Aug 10;19(8):e1011284. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011284. eCollection 2023 Aug.
6
Gender (in)equity in global mental health research: A call to action.全球精神卫生研究中的性别(不)平等:行动呼吁。
Transcult Psychiatry. 2023 Jun;60(3):400-411. doi: 10.1177/13634615231180376. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
7
List-keepers and other carrier bag stories: Academic mothers' (in)visible labor during the COVID-19 pandemic.清单管理者及其他购物袋故事:新冠疫情期间学术母亲们的(不)可见劳动
Womens Stud Int Forum. 2023 May-Jun;98:102755. doi: 10.1016/j.wsif.2023.102755. Epub 2023 May 16.
8
Pandemic productivity loss: how scientific institutions should support academic mothers.疫情期间的生产力损失:科研机构应如何支持有子女的学术界人士。
Nature. 2023 Mar;615(7954):955-957. doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-00888-3.
9
The effect of the Covid-19 pandemic on STEM faculty: Productivity and work-life balance.新冠疫情对 STEM 教师的影响:生产力和工作生活平衡。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 27;18(1):e0280581. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280581. eCollection 2023.
10
"Where do I even start?" Recommendations for faculty diversifying syllabi in ecology, evolution, and the life sciences.“我该从哪里开始呢?”关于教师使生态学、进化生物学及生命科学教学大纲多样化的建议。
Ecol Evol. 2023 Jan 3;13(1):e9719. doi: 10.1002/ece3.9719. eCollection 2023 Jan.
Nature. 2020 Jul;583(7818):867-869. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-02183-x.
4
Unequal effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on scientists.新冠疫情对科学家的不平等影响。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Sep;4(9):880-883. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0921-y.
5
COVID-19's Disproportionate Impact on Communities of Color Spotlights the Nation's Systemic Inequities.新冠疫情对有色人种社区的不成比例影响凸显了美国的系统性不平等。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2020 Nov/Dec;26(6):518-521. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001212.
6
PNAS and prejudice.《美国国家科学院院刊》与偏见。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jul 21;117(29):16710-16712. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2012747117. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
7
The Disproportionate Impact of COVID-19 on Racial and Ethnic Minorities in the United States.美国新冠疫情对少数族裔的不成比例影响。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Feb 16;72(4):703-706. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa815.
8
The extent and drivers of gender imbalance in neuroscience reference lists.神经科学参考文献中性别失衡的程度和驱动因素。
Nat Neurosci. 2020 Aug;23(8):918-926. doi: 10.1038/s41593-020-0658-y. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
9
Opinion: In the wake of COVID-19, academia needs new solutions to ensure gender equity.观点:在新冠疫情之后,学术界需要新的解决方案来确保性别平等。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jul 7;117(27):15378-15381. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2010636117. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
10
COVID-19 medical papers have fewer women first authors than expected.COVID-19 医学论文中女性第一作者的数量低于预期。
Elife. 2020 Jun 15;9:e58807. doi: 10.7554/eLife.58807.