Takeuchi Daiji, Toyohara Keiko, Yagishita Daigo, Yazaki Kyoichiro, Higuchi Satoshi, Ejima Koichiro, Shoda Morio, Hagiwara Nobuhisa
Department of Pediatric and Adult Congenital Cardiology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Tokyo Japan.
Department of Cardiology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Tokyo Japan.
Circ Rep. 2019 Sep 22;1(10):445-455. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-19-0069.
Little is known about the acute/long-term outcomes of implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) using a transvenous approach for patients with congenital heart disease (CHD). We retrospectively investigated the acute/long-term results and complications associated with transvenous CIED implantation in 140 patients with CHD. We implanted 77 pacemakers, 51 implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD), and 12 cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices. Although we successfully implanted pacemakers and ICD in all patients, we could not place a coronary sinus (CS) lead in 25% of the patients requiring CRT devices due to coronary vein anomalies associated with corrected transposition of the great arteries (cTGA). Overall complication rate, lead failure rate, and incidence of device infection were 16%, 9%, and 0.7%, respectively. There was no significant difference in overall complication rates between the simple (n=22) and complex CHD (n=118) groups (14% vs. 16%). The 10-year lead survival for the ICD leads (77%) was significantly lower than for the pacemaker leads (91%, P=0.0065). The outcomes of transvenous CIED in patients with CHD seemed acceptable, although there was a relatively high incidence of complications. CS lead placement for cTGA may be hindered by coronary vein anomalies. Lead survival tended to be lower for ICD than for pacemakers in these patients.
对于先天性心脏病(CHD)患者采用经静脉途径植入心脏植入式电子设备(CIED)的急性/长期预后知之甚少。我们回顾性研究了140例CHD患者经静脉CIED植入的急性/长期结果及相关并发症。我们植入了77台起搏器、51台植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)和12台心脏再同步治疗(CRT)设备。尽管我们成功地为所有患者植入了起搏器和ICD,但由于与大动脉转位矫正(cTGA)相关的冠状静脉异常,在需要CRT设备的患者中,有25%无法放置冠状窦(CS)导联。总体并发症发生率、导联故障率和设备感染发生率分别为16%、9%和0.7%。简单CHD组(n = 22)和复杂CHD组(n = 118)的总体并发症发生率无显著差异(14%对16%)。ICD导联的10年导联生存率(77%)显著低于起搏器导联(91%,P = 0.0065)。CHD患者经静脉CIED的预后似乎可以接受,尽管并发症发生率相对较高。cTGA患者的CS导联放置可能会受到冠状静脉异常的阻碍。在这些患者中,ICD的导联生存率往往低于起搏器。