Suppr超能文献

成人先天性心脏病患者植入式心脏复律除颤器的长期随访:适应证与结局

Long-term follow-up of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in adult congenital heart disease patients: indications and outcomes.

作者信息

Santharam Sandhya, Hudsmith Lucy, Thorne Sara, Clift Paul, Marshall Howard, De Bono Joseph

机构信息

University of Birmingham Medical School, Birmingham, UK.

Department of Cardiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham UK.

出版信息

Europace. 2017 Mar 1;19(3):407-413. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw076.

Abstract

AIMS

Ventricular arrhythmias are a major cause of mortality in adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) patients. The European Society of Cardiology guidelines state that implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) should be considered in patients with congenital heart disease following spontaneous sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or cardiac arrest and in patients at presumed high risk. This study sought to analyse the circumstances in which ACHD patients received ICD and to assess outcomes of ICD implantation, including therapies delivered and the rate of complications.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A retrospective review was performed of all adult patients with congenital heart disease undergoing ICD implant between 2000 and 2014, in a large quaternary referral centre with over 4000 adults with congenital heart disease under active follow-up. Demographics: 42 patients with congenital heart disease had ICD implants: 55% male; age range 21-71 years and mean age 45 years. Mean age at implantation of ICD was 41 years. Mean follow-up was 5 years. Diagnosis: 50% of patients had repaired tetralogy of Fallot (TOF). Twelve per cent of patients had repaired transposition of the great arteries. Reason for ICD: 15 patients (35.7%) received ICD after sustained VT. Eleven patients (26.2%) received ICD after cardiac arrest. Sixteen (38%) had ICD implanted as primary prophylaxis. Outcome: Since implantation, six patients received an appropriate full-output shock for VT from ICD. Nineteen (45%) patients suffered significant complications (inappropriate shocks 11, inappropriate anti-tachycardia pacing resulting in VF 1, infection requiring extraction 3, lead abnormalities 3, and pneumothorax 1). Equal proportions of primary and secondary prevention patients received appropriate shocks.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients had ICD for secondary prevention (62%), and the majority had repaired TOF. There was a 2.9% annual appropriate shock rate. However, there was a high incidence of complications with more than a third suffering a major complication (9% per annum). The risks and benefits of ICD implantation are patient and disease specific, and must be clearly discussed prior to implantation. Further research is warranted into the use of primary prevention ICD in ACHD and in alternatives to ICD such as ablation in specific patient groups.

摘要

目的

室性心律失常是成人先天性心脏病(ACHD)患者死亡的主要原因。欧洲心脏病学会指南指出,对于先天性心脏病患者,若发生自发性持续性室性心动过速(VT)或心脏骤停,以及处于假定高风险状态的患者,应考虑植入植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)。本研究旨在分析ACHD患者接受ICD植入的情况,并评估ICD植入的结果,包括所给予的治疗及并发症发生率。

方法与结果

对2000年至2014年间在一家大型四级转诊中心接受ICD植入的所有成年先天性心脏病患者进行回顾性研究,该中心有超过4000名成年先天性心脏病患者正在接受积极随访。人口统计学资料:42例先天性心脏病患者接受了ICD植入:男性占55%;年龄范围为21至71岁,平均年龄45岁。ICD植入时的平均年龄为41岁。平均随访时间为5年。诊断:50%的患者曾接受法洛四联症(TOF)修复术。12%的患者曾接受大动脉转位修复术。植入ICD的原因:15例患者(35.7%)在持续性VT后接受ICD植入。11例患者(26.2%)在心脏骤停后接受ICD植入。16例(38%)患者作为一级预防而植入ICD。结果:自植入以来,6例患者因VT接受了ICD的适当全能量电击。19例(45%)患者出现严重并发症(不适当电击11例、不适当抗心动过速起搏导致室颤1例、感染需拔除装置3例、导线异常3例和气胸1例)。一级预防和二级预防患者接受适当电击的比例相同。

结论

大多数患者接受ICD是用于二级预防(62%),且大多数患者接受过TOF修复术。每年的适当电击率为2.9%。然而,并发症发生率较高,超过三分之一的患者出现严重并发症(每年9%)。ICD植入的风险和益处因患者和疾病而异,在植入前必须进行明确讨论。有必要进一步研究ACHD患者中一级预防ICD的使用情况以及特定患者群体中ICD的替代方法,如消融术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验