• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心血管医学中基于证据的预后预测模型应用

Evidence-Based Utilization of Prognostic Prediction Models in Cardiovascular Medicine.

作者信息

Iwakami Naotsugu, Nagai Toshiyuki, Furukawa Toshiaki A, Nishimura Kunihiro, Anzai Toshihisa

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center Suita Japan.

Department of Research Promotion and Management, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center Suita Japan.

出版信息

Circ Rep. 2019 Dec 5;2(1):10-16. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-19-0111.

DOI:10.1253/circrep.CR-19-0111
PMID:33693169
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7929709/
Abstract

Prediction models are combinations of predictors to assess the risks of specific endpoints such as the presence or prognosis of a disease. Many novel predictors have been developed, modelling techniques have been evolving, and prediction models are currently abundant in the medical literature, especially in cardiovascular medicine, but evidence is still lacking regarding how to use them. Recent methodological advances in systematic reviews and meta-analysis have enabled systematic evaluation of prediction model studies and quantitative analysis to identify determinants of model performance. Knowing what is critical to model performance, under what circumstances model performance remains adequate, and when a model might require further adjustment and improvement will facilitate effective utilization of prediction models and will enhance diagnostic and prognostic accuracy in clinical practice. In this review article, we provide a current methodological overview of the attempts to implement evidence-based utilization of prognostic prediction models for all potential model users, including patients and their families, health-care providers, administrators, researchers, guideline developers and policy makers.

摘要

预测模型是预测因素的组合,用于评估特定终点事件的风险,如疾病的存在或预后。许多新型预测因素已被开发出来,建模技术也在不断发展,目前医学文献中充斥着预测模型,尤其是在心血管医学领域,但在如何使用这些模型方面仍缺乏证据。系统评价和荟萃分析方面的最新方法进展使得对预测模型研究进行系统评价和定量分析成为可能,以确定模型性能的决定因素。了解对模型性能至关重要的因素、模型性能在何种情况下仍足够以及模型何时可能需要进一步调整和改进,将有助于有效利用预测模型,并提高临床实践中的诊断和预后准确性。在这篇综述文章中,我们为所有潜在的模型使用者,包括患者及其家属、医疗保健提供者、管理人员、研究人员、指南制定者和政策制定者,提供了当前关于实施基于证据的预后预测模型应用的方法概述。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80d6/7929709/35dcfafacd17/circrep-2-10-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80d6/7929709/11a3b16c72c2/circrep-2-10-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80d6/7929709/590eb041d451/circrep-2-10-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80d6/7929709/9748bd2b09a5/circrep-2-10-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80d6/7929709/35dcfafacd17/circrep-2-10-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80d6/7929709/11a3b16c72c2/circrep-2-10-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80d6/7929709/590eb041d451/circrep-2-10-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80d6/7929709/9748bd2b09a5/circrep-2-10-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80d6/7929709/35dcfafacd17/circrep-2-10-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Evidence-Based Utilization of Prognostic Prediction Models in Cardiovascular Medicine.心血管医学中基于证据的预后预测模型应用
Circ Rep. 2019 Dec 5;2(1):10-16. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-19-0111.
2
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
3
4
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
5
6
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
7
The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review.临床前和临床研究、系统评价与荟萃分析以及临床实践指南的方法学质量评估工具:一项系统评价。
J Evid Based Med. 2015 Feb;8(1):2-10. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12141.
8
Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data.医疗服务量与健康结果:来自系统评价及意大利医院数据评估的证据
Epidemiol Prev. 2017 Sep-Dec;41(5-6 (Suppl 2)):1-128. doi: 10.19191/EP17.5-6S2.P001.100.
9
Prediction of risk of recurrence of venous thromboembolism following treatment for a first unprovoked venous thromboembolism: systematic review, prognostic model and clinical decision rule, and economic evaluation.首次特发性静脉血栓栓塞症治疗后静脉血栓栓塞症复发风险的预测:系统评价、预后模型与临床决策规则以及经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Feb;20(12):i-xxxiii, 1-190. doi: 10.3310/hta20120.
10

本文引用的文献

1
PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration.PROBAST:一种用于评估偏倚风险和预测模型研究适用性的工具:说明和阐述。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Jan 1;170(1):W1-W33. doi: 10.7326/M18-1377.
2
PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies.PROBAST:一种用于评估偏倚风险和预测模型研究适用性的工具。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Jan 1;170(1):51-58. doi: 10.7326/M18-1376.
3
A framework for meta-analysis of prediction model studies with binary and time-to-event outcomes.
用于二元和事件发生时间结局的预测模型研究的Meta分析框架。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Sep;28(9):2768-2786. doi: 10.1177/0962280218785504. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
4
A guide to systematic review and meta-analysis of prediction model performance.预测模型性能的系统评价与Meta分析指南。
BMJ. 2017 Jan 5;356:i6460. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i6460.
5
Prognostic value of malnutrition assessed by Controlling Nutritional Status score for long-term mortality in patients with acute heart failure.通过控制营养状况评分评估的营养不良对急性心力衰竭患者长期死亡率的预后价值。
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Mar 1;230:529-536. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.12.064. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
6
External validation of clinical prediction models using big datasets from e-health records or IPD meta-analysis: opportunities and challenges.利用电子健康记录或个体患者数据(IPD)荟萃分析的大数据集对临床预测模型进行外部验证:机遇与挑战
BMJ. 2016 Jun 22;353:i3140. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i3140.
7
Prognostic significance of endogenous erythropoietin in long-term outcome of patients with acute decompensated heart failure.内源性促红细胞生成素对急性失代偿性心力衰竭患者长期预后的预测意义。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2016 Jul;18(7):803-13. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.537. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
8
Individual participant data (IPD) meta-analyses of diagnostic and prognostic modeling studies: guidance on their use.诊断和预后模型研究的个体参与者数据(IPD)荟萃分析:使用指南
PLoS Med. 2015 Oct 13;12(10):e1001886. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001886. eCollection 2015 Oct.
9
Clinical Prediction Models for Cardiovascular Disease: Tufts Predictive Analytics and Comparative Effectiveness Clinical Prediction Model Database.心血管疾病的临床预测模型:塔夫茨预测分析与比较效果临床预测模型数据库。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015 Jul;8(4):368-75. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.001693. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
10
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of individual participant data: the PRISMA-IPD Statement.个体参与者数据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目:PRISMA-IPD 声明。
JAMA. 2015 Apr 28;313(16):1657-65. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.3656.