• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病患者植入新一代药物洗脱支架后随访期间血糖控制对晚期靶病变血运重建的影响——一项单中心观察性研究

Effect of Glycemic Control During Follow-up on Late Target Lesion Revascularization After Implantation of New-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients With Diabetes - A Single-Center Observational Study.

作者信息

Fujita Takanari, Takeda Teruki, Tsujino Yasushi, Yamaji Masayuki, Sakaguchi Tomoko, Maeda Keiko, Mabuchi Hiroshi, Murakami Tomoyuki, Morimoto Takeshi, Kimura Takeshi

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Koto Memorial Hospital Higashiomi Japan.

Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Hyogo College of Medicine Nishinomiya Japan.

出版信息

Circ Rep. 2020 Aug 4;2(9):479-489. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-20-0065.

DOI:10.1253/circrep.CR-20-0065
PMID:33693273
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7819662/
Abstract

Few studies have investigated the importance of glycemic control in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) for reducing the incidence of late target lesion revascularization (TLR) after implantation of new-generation drug-eluting stents (DES). We retrospectively identified 1,568 patients who underwent new-generation DES implantation. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on diabetic status and glycemic control 1 year after the procedure: those without DM (non-DM group; n=1,058) and those with DM at follow-up with either good (HbA1c <7%; n=328) or poor (HbA1c ≥7%; n=182) control. The cumulative 5-year incidence of clinically driven late TLR after the index procedure was significantly higher in DM with poor control at follow-up than in those with good control at follow-up or non-DM (14%, 4.8%, and 2.9%, respectively; P<0.0001). Multivariate analysis revealed that poor control at follow-up was significantly associated with a higher risk of clinically driven late TLR compared with the non-DM group (hazard ratio [HR] 4.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.50-8.16, P<0.0001). However, good control at follow-up group was not associated with a higher risk of clinically driven late TLR compared with the non-DM group (HR 1.35, 95% CI 0.68-2.56, P=0.38). DM patients with poor glycemic control at follow-up had a significantly higher risk of clinically driven late TLR than non-DM patients.

摘要

很少有研究调查糖尿病(DM)患者血糖控制对于降低新一代药物洗脱支架(DES)植入后晚期靶病变血管重建(TLR)发生率的重要性。我们回顾性地确定了1568例行新一代DES植入术的患者。根据术后1年的糖尿病状态和血糖控制情况,将患者分为3组:无DM者(非DM组;n = 1058)以及随访时患有DM且血糖控制良好(糖化血红蛋白<7%;n = 328)或控制不佳(糖化血红蛋白≥7%;n = 182)者。随访时血糖控制不佳的DM患者在索引手术后临床驱动的晚期TLR累积5年发生率显著高于随访时血糖控制良好者或非DM患者(分别为14%、4.8%和2.9%;P<0.0001)。多变量分析显示,与非DM组相比,随访时控制不佳与临床驱动的晚期TLR风险较高显著相关(风险比[HR] 4.58,95%置信区间[CI] 2.50 - 8.16,P<0.0001)。然而,与非DM组相比,随访时控制良好组与临床驱动的晚期TLR风险较高无关(HR 1.35,95% CI 0.68 - 2.56,P = 0.38)。随访时血糖控制不佳的DM患者发生临床驱动的晚期TLR的风险显著高于非DM患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fe3/7819662/23a8d51a849c/circrep-2-479-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fe3/7819662/11abba2831bc/circrep-2-479-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fe3/7819662/f8fce69219d2/circrep-2-479-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fe3/7819662/ddb8b66c4200/circrep-2-479-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fe3/7819662/23a8d51a849c/circrep-2-479-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fe3/7819662/11abba2831bc/circrep-2-479-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fe3/7819662/f8fce69219d2/circrep-2-479-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fe3/7819662/ddb8b66c4200/circrep-2-479-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fe3/7819662/23a8d51a849c/circrep-2-479-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of Glycemic Control During Follow-up on Late Target Lesion Revascularization After Implantation of New-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients With Diabetes - A Single-Center Observational Study.糖尿病患者植入新一代药物洗脱支架后随访期间血糖控制对晚期靶病变血运重建的影响——一项单中心观察性研究
Circ Rep. 2020 Aug 4;2(9):479-489. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-20-0065.
2
Effect of diabetes mellitus on long-term outcomes after repeat drug-eluting stent implantation for in-stent restenosis.糖尿病对药物洗脱支架再植入治疗支架内再狭窄后长期预后的影响。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017 Jan 6;17(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0445-6.
3
Biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents versus second-generation drug-eluting stents in patients with and without diabetes mellitus: a single-center study.可生物降解聚合物药物洗脱支架与第二代药物洗脱支架在糖尿病患者与非糖尿病患者中的应用:一项单中心研究。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2018 Aug 14;17(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12933-018-0758-0.
4
[Safety and efficacy of second generation drug eluting stents in diabetic and non-diabetic patients].第二代药物洗脱支架在糖尿病和非糖尿病患者中的安全性和有效性
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2018 Nov 20;98(43):3473-3478. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2018.43.003.
5
Comparison of outcomes after everolimus-eluting stent implantation in diabetic versus non-diabetic patients in the Tokyo-MD PCI study.东京医学中心经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)研究中,糖尿病患者与非糖尿病患者植入依维莫司洗脱支架后的疗效比较。
J Cardiol. 2016 Mar;67(3):241-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2015.05.013. Epub 2015 Jun 27.
6
Incidence and predictors for late target lesion revascularization after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation.西罗莫司洗脱支架置入术后晚期靶病变血运重建的发生率及预测因素。
Circ J. 2013;77(4):988-94. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-12-0570. Epub 2012 Dec 28.
7
Second-generation versus first-generation drug-eluting stents in patients with and without diabetes mellitus: pooled analysis from the RESET and NEXT trials.糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者中第二代与第一代药物洗脱支架的比较:来自RESET和NEXT试验的汇总分析
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2018 Apr;33(2):125-134. doi: 10.1007/s12928-017-0458-9. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
8
Predictors of early and late target lesion revascularization after drug-eluting stent implantation.药物洗脱支架置入术后早期和晚期靶病变血运重建的预测因素。
J Interv Cardiol. 2013 Apr;26(2):137-44. doi: 10.1111/joic.12001. Epub 2012 Nov 19.
9
Late adverse events after implantation of sirolimus-eluting stent and bare-metal stent: long-term (5-7 years) follow-up of the Coronary Revascularization Demonstrating Outcome study-Kyoto registry Cohort-2.西罗莫司洗脱支架和裸金属支架植入后的晚期不良事件:冠状动脉血运重建显示结局研究-京都注册队列-2 的长期(5-7 年)随访。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Apr;7(2):168-79. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.113.000987. Epub 2014 Feb 18.
10
Routine angiographic follow-up versus clinical follow-up in patients with diabetes following percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents in Korean population.韩国人群经皮冠状动脉介入治疗伴药物洗脱支架后糖尿病患者的常规血管造影随访与临床随访比较。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018 Apr;138:138-148. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.02.007. Epub 2018 Feb 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Deteriorative Effect of a Combination of Hypertriglyceridemia and Low High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterolemia on Target Lesion Revascularization after Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation.高甘油三酯血症和低高密度脂蛋白胆固醇血症联合对依维莫司洗脱支架置入后靶病变血运重建的恶化影响。
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2023 Dec 1;30(12):1778-1790. doi: 10.5551/jat.64010. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
2
Outcomes of deferred revascularisation following negative fractional flow reserve in diabetic and non-diabetic patients: a meta-analysis.糖尿病和非糖尿病患者阴性分数血流储备指导下延迟血运重建的结果:一项荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2023 Jan 30;22(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12933-023-01751-5.
3

本文引用的文献

1
2019 ESC Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD.2019年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)与欧洲糖尿病研究协会(EASD)合作制定的糖尿病、糖尿病前期和心血管疾病指南。
Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 7;41(2):255-323. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz486.
2
Incidence and predictors of target lesion failure in patients undergoing contemporary DES implantation-Individual patient data pooled analysis from 6 randomized controlled trials.当代 DES 植入术后患者靶病变失败的发生率及预测因素——来自 6 项随机对照试验的个体患者数据汇总分析。
Am Heart J. 2019 Jul;213:105-111. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.03.011. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
3
Diabetes and restenosis.
糖尿病与再狭窄。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022 Feb 14;21(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12933-022-01460-5.
Glycemic Control Status After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
2型糖尿病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的血糖控制状况及长期临床结局
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Apr;10(4). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004157.
4
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Insulin-Treated and Non-Insulin-Treated Diabetes Mellitus: Secondary Analysis of the TUXEDO Trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗伴或不伴胰岛素治疗的糖尿病患者:TUXEDO 试验的二次分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2016 Jun 1;1(3):266-73. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.0305.
5
Neoatherosclerosis: overview of histopathologic findings and implications for intravascular imaging assessment.血管新生动脉硬化:组织病理学发现概述及其对血管内影像学评估的影响。
Eur Heart J. 2015 Aug 21;36(32):2147-59. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv205. Epub 2015 May 20.
6
Assessment of characteristics of neointimal hyperplasia after drug-eluting stent implantation in patients with diabetes mellitus: an optical coherence tomography analysis.糖尿病患者药物洗脱支架植入术后新生内膜增生特征的评估:光学相干断层扫描分析
Cardiology. 2014;128(1):34-40. doi: 10.1159/000357612. Epub 2014 Feb 7.
7
Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels and clinical outcomes in diabetic patients following coronary artery stenting.糖化血红蛋白 (HbA1c) 水平与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后糖尿病患者的临床结局。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2012 Jul 17;11:82. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-11-82.
8
Randomized comparison of everolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents. 2-year follow-up from the SPIRIT (Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System) IV trial.随机比较依维莫司洗脱支架和紫杉醇洗脱支架。来自 SPIRIT(依维莫司洗脱 XIENCE V 冠状动脉支架系统的临床评估)IV 试验的 2 年随访结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Jun 28;58(1):19-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.02.022. Epub 2011 Apr 21.
9
Unrestricted randomised use of two new generation drug-eluting coronary stents: 2-year patient-related versus stent-related outcomes from the RESOLUTE All Comers trial.无限制随机使用两种新一代药物洗脱冠状动脉支架:RESOLUTE 所有患者试验 2 年的患者相关与支架相关结局。
Lancet. 2011 Apr 9;377(9773):1241-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60395-4. Epub 2011 Apr 1.
10
Impact of glycemic control on the clinical outcome in diabetic patients with percutaneous coronary intervention--from the FU-registry.血糖控制对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的糖尿病患者临床结局的影响——来自 FU 注册研究。
Circ J. 2011;75(4):791-9. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-10-0474. Epub 2011 Mar 18.