• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

粪便免疫化学检测和血液检测在有症状患者中对紧急结直肠癌转诊的优先排序:为期 2 年的评估。

Faecal immunochemical testing and blood tests for prioritization of urgent colorectal cancer referrals in symptomatic patients: a 2-year evaluation.

机构信息

Nottingham Colorectal Service, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.

Eastern Hub, Bowel Cancer Screening Programme, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.

出版信息

BJS Open. 2021 Mar 5;5(2). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraa056.

DOI:10.1093/bjsopen/zraa056
PMID:33693553
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7947575/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A novel pathway incorporating faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) for rapid colorectal cancer diagnosis (RCCD) was introduced in 2017. This paper reports on the service evaluation after 2 years of pathway implementation.

METHODS

The RCCD protocol was based on FIT, blood results and symptoms to stratify adult patients in primary care. Two-week-wait (2WW) investigation was indicated for patients with rectal bleeding, rectal mass and faecal haemoglobin (fHb) level of 10 µg Hb/g faeces or above or 4 µg Hb/g faeces or more in the presence of anaemia, low ferritin or thrombocytosis, in all other symptom groups. Patients with 100 µg Hb/g faeces or above had expedited investigation . A retrospective audit of colorectal cancer detected between 2017 and 2019 was conducted, fHb thresholds were reviewed and critically assessed for cancer diagnoses.

RESULTS

In 2 years, 14788 FIT tests were dispatched with 13361 (90.4 per cent) completed returns. Overall, fHb was less than 4 µg Hb/g faeces in 9208 results (68.9 per cent), 4-9.9 µg Hb/g in 1583 (11.8 per cent), 10-99.9 µg Hb/g in 1850 (13.8 per cent) and 100 µg Hb/g faeces or above in 720 (5.4 per cent). During follow-up (median 10.4 months), 227 colorectal cancers were diagnosed. The cancer detection rate was 0.1 per cent in patients with fHb below 4 µg Hb/g faeces, 0.6 per cent in those with fHb 4-9.9 µg Hb/g faeces, 3.3 per cent for fHb 10-99.9 µg Hb/g faeces and 20.7 per cent for fHb 100 µg Hb/g faeces or above. The detection rate in the cohort with 10-19.9 µg Hb/g faeces was 1.4 per cent, below the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence threshold for urgent referral. The colorectal cancer rate in patients with fHb below 20 µg Hb/g faeces was less than 0.3 per cent.

CONCLUSION

Use of FIT to "rule out" urgent referral from primary care misses a small number of cases. The threshold for referral may be adjusted with blood results to improve stratification .

摘要

背景

2017 年引入了一种包含粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)的快速结直肠癌诊断(RCCD)新途径。本文报告了该途径实施两年后的服务评估结果。

方法

RCCD 方案基于 FIT、血液结果和症状,对初级保健中的成年患者进行分层。对于有直肠出血、直肠肿块和粪便血红蛋白(fHb)水平为 10μg Hb/g 粪便或以上或贫血、低铁蛋白或血小板增多症患者,fHb 水平为 4μg Hb/g 粪便或以上或以上,则进行两周等待(2WW)调查。在所有其他症状组中,fHb 水平为 100μg Hb/g 粪便或以上的患者需要进行紧急检查。对 2017 年至 2019 年期间检测到的结直肠癌进行了回顾性审核,审查并批判性评估了 fHb 阈值与癌症诊断的关系。

结果

在两年内,共发送了 14788 次 FIT 检测,其中 13361 次(90.4%)完成了返回。总体而言,9208 份结果中 fHb 小于 4μg Hb/g 粪便(68.9%),1583 份结果中 fHb 为 4-9.9μg Hb/g(11.8%),1850 份结果中 fHb 为 10-99.9μg Hb/g(13.8%),720 份结果中 fHb 为 100μg Hb/g 粪便或以上(5.4%)。在随访期间(中位数为 10.4 个月),诊断出 227 例结直肠癌。fHb 低于 4μg Hb/g 粪便的患者癌症检出率为 0.1%,fHb 为 4-9.9μg Hb/g 粪便的患者癌症检出率为 0.6%,fHb 为 10-99.9μg Hb/g 粪便的患者癌症检出率为 3.3%,fHb 为 100μg Hb/g 粪便或以上的患者癌症检出率为 20.7%。fHb 为 10-19.9μg Hb/g 粪便的患者检出率为 1.4%,低于国家卫生与保健卓越研究所(NICE)的紧急转诊阈值。fHb 低于 20μg Hb/g 粪便的患者结直肠癌发生率低于 0.3%。

结论

使用 FIT 来“排除”初级保健中的紧急转诊会遗漏少数病例。可以结合血液结果调整转诊阈值,以改善分层。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ae7/7947575/e64b7632cd2d/zraa056f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ae7/7947575/e64b7632cd2d/zraa056f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ae7/7947575/e64b7632cd2d/zraa056f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Faecal immunochemical testing and blood tests for prioritization of urgent colorectal cancer referrals in symptomatic patients: a 2-year evaluation.粪便免疫化学检测和血液检测在有症状患者中对紧急结直肠癌转诊的优先排序:为期 2 年的评估。
BJS Open. 2021 Mar 5;5(2). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraa056.
2
Service evaluation of faecal immunochemical testing and anaemia for risk stratification in the 2-week-wait pathway for colorectal cancer.粪便免疫化学检测和贫血用于结直肠癌 2 周等待路径风险分层的服务评估。
BJS Open. 2019 Jan 28;3(3):395-402. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50131. eCollection 2019 Jun.
3
Faecal haemoglobin concentration thresholds for reassurance and urgent investigation for colorectal cancer based on a faecal immunochemical test in symptomatic patients in primary care.基于粪便免疫化学试验在初级保健中有症状患者中用于结直肠癌的确认和紧急调查的粪便血红蛋白浓度阈值。
Ann Clin Biochem. 2021 May;58(3):211-219. doi: 10.1177/0004563220985547. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
4
Faecal haemoglobin concentration is related to detection of advanced colorectal neoplasia in the next screening round.粪便血红蛋白浓度与下一轮筛查中晚期结直肠肿瘤的检测有关。
J Med Screen. 2017 Jun;24(2):62-68. doi: 10.1177/0969141316653983. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
5
'Low' faecal immunochemical test (FIT) colorectal cancer: a 4-year comparison of the Nottingham '4F' protocol with FIT10 in symptomatic patients.低粪便免疫化学测试(FIT)结直肠癌:症状性患者中诺丁汉“4F”方案与 FIT10 的 4 年比较。
Colorectal Dis. 2024 Feb;26(2):309-316. doi: 10.1111/codi.16848. Epub 2024 Jan 3.
6
Symptom or faecal immunochemical test based referral criteria for colorectal cancer detection in symptomatic patients: a diagnostic tests study.有症状患者中基于症状或粪便免疫化学检测的结直肠癌检测转诊标准:一项诊断试验研究
BMC Gastroenterol. 2018 Oct 25;18(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12876-018-0887-7.
7
Early clinical outcomes of a rapid colorectal cancer diagnosis pathway using faecal immunochemical testing in Nottingham.使用粪便免疫化学检测在诺丁汉快速诊断结直肠癌的早期临床结果。
Colorectal Dis. 2020 Jun;22(6):679-688. doi: 10.1111/codi.14944. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
8
Faecal immunochemical test to triage patients with possible colorectal cancer symptoms: meta-analysis.粪便免疫化学试验对疑似结直肠癌症状患者的分诊:荟萃分析。
Br J Surg. 2022 Feb 1;109(2):182-190. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab411.
9
High-risk symptoms and quantitative faecal immunochemical test accuracy: Systematic review and meta-analysis.高危症状与定量粪便免疫化学检测的准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 May 21;25(19):2383-2401. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i19.2383.
10
Service evaluation of faecal immunochemical testing introduced for use in North East London for patients at low risk of colorectal cancer.粪便免疫化学检测在英国伦敦东北部用于低结直肠癌风险患者的服务评估。
J Clin Pathol. 2021 Mar;74(3):163-166. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2020-206632. Epub 2020 Jul 9.

引用本文的文献

1
External validation of the COLOFIT colorectal cancer risk prediction model in the Oxford-FIT dataset: the importance of population characteristics and clinically relevant evaluation metrics.COLOFIT结直肠癌风险预测模型在牛津粪便隐血试验(Oxford-FIT)数据集中的外部验证:人群特征和临床相关评估指标的重要性
BMC Med. 2025 Aug 27;23(1):503. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-04339-w.
2
COLOFIT: Development and Internal-External Validation of Models Using Age, Sex, Faecal Immunochemical and Blood Tests to Optimise Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer in Symptomatic Patients.COLOFIT:利用年龄、性别、粪便免疫化学检测和血液检测优化有症状患者结直肠癌诊断的模型开发及内部-外部验证
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2025 Mar;61(5):852-864. doi: 10.1111/apt.18459. Epub 2025 Jan 7.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Faecal immunochemical test is superior to symptoms in predicting pathology in patients with suspected colorectal cancer symptoms referred on a 2WW pathway: a diagnostic accuracy study.粪便免疫化学试验在预测疑似结直肠癌症状患者的病理方面优于症状,这些患者通过 2WW 途径转诊:一项诊断准确性研究。
Gut. 2021 Jun;70(6):1130-1138. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321956. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
2
Optimal diagnostic accuracy of quantitative faecal immunochemical test positivity thresholds for colorectal cancer detection in primary health care: A community-based cohort study.定量粪便免疫化学检测阳性阈值在初级保健中用于结直肠癌检测的最佳诊断准确性:一项基于社区的队列研究。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2021 Mar;9(2):256-267. doi: 10.1177/2050640620949714. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
3
Faecal immunochemical tests for patients with symptoms suggestive of colorectal cancer: An updated systematic review and multiple-threshold meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies.针对有结直肠癌疑似症状患者的粪便免疫化学检测:诊断试验准确性研究的最新系统评价和多阈值Meta分析
Colorectal Dis. 2024 Dec 17;27(1). doi: 10.1111/codi.17255.
4
Sociodemographic variations in the uptake of faecal immunochemical tests in primary care: a retrospective study.社会人口统计学因素对初级保健中粪便免疫化学检测接受率的影响:一项回顾性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2023 Oct 26;73(736):e843-e849. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2023.0033. Print 2023 Nov.
5
Can endoscopic follow-up after acute diverticulitis be rationalised?急性憩室炎后行内镜随访是否合理?
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jul;37(7):5114-5120. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09997-6. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
6
Role of the faecal immunochemical test in patients with risk-stratified suspected colorectal cancer symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis to inform the ACPGBI/BSG guidelines.粪便免疫化学检测在具有风险分层的疑似结直肠癌症状患者中的作用:一项系统评价和荟萃分析以指导英国和爱尔兰结直肠外科医师协会/英国胃肠病学会指南
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2022 Oct 3;23:100518. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100518. eCollection 2022 Dec.
7
Faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) in patients with signs or symptoms of suspected colorectal cancer (CRC): a joint guideline from the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) and the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG).疑似结直肠癌(CRC)体征或症状患者的粪便免疫化学检测(FIT):英国和爱尔兰结直肠外科学会(ACPGBI)与英国胃肠病学会(BSG)联合指南
Gut. 2022 Jul 12;71(10):1939-62. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327985.
8
Prioritisation of lower gastrointestinal endoscopy during the COVID-19 pandemic: outcomes of a novel triage pathway.2019冠状病毒病大流行期间下消化道内镜检查的优先排序:一种新型分诊途径的结果
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2021 Jun 8;13(3):225-230. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2021-101825. eCollection 2022.
9
A cohort study of duplicate faecal immunochemical testing in patients at risk of colorectal cancer from North-West England.英格兰西北部结直肠癌高危人群粪便免疫化学重复检测的队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 13;12(4):e059940. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059940.
10
Combining faecal immunochemical testing with blood test results for colorectal cancer risk stratification: a consecutive cohort of 16,604 patients presenting to primary care.联合粪便免疫化学检测和血液检测结果进行结直肠癌风险分层:一项纳入 16604 例首诊于基层医疗的连续队列研究。
BMC Med. 2022 Mar 15;20(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02272-w.
Thrombocytosis helps to stratify risk of colorectal cancer in patients referred on a 2-week-wait pathway.血小板增多有助于对通过两周等待路径转诊的结直肠癌患者的风险进行分层。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020 Jul;35(7):1347-1350. doi: 10.1007/s00384-020-03597-9. Epub 2020 May 1.
4
GP access to FIT increases the proportion of colorectal cancers detected on urgent pathways in symptomatic patients in Nottingham.全科医生获得 FIT(粪便免疫化学检测)可增加诺丁汉有症状患者中通过紧急途径检测到的结直肠癌比例。
Surgeon. 2021 Apr;19(2):93-102. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2020.03.002. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
5
FIT negative cancers: A right-sided problem? Implications for screening and whether iron deficiency anaemia has a role to play.FIT 阴性癌症:右侧问题?对筛查的影响以及缺铁性贫血是否发挥作用。
Surgeon. 2021 Feb;19(1):27-32. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2020.02.003. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
6
Early clinical outcomes of a rapid colorectal cancer diagnosis pathway using faecal immunochemical testing in Nottingham.使用粪便免疫化学检测在诺丁汉快速诊断结直肠癌的早期临床结果。
Colorectal Dis. 2020 Jun;22(6):679-688. doi: 10.1111/codi.14944. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
7
Appraisal of the faecal haemoglobin, age and sex test (FAST) score in assessment of patients with lower bowel symptoms: an observational study.粪便血红蛋白、年龄和性别检测(FAST)评分在评估下消化道症状患者中的应用评价:一项观察性研究。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2019 Dec 11;19(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s12876-019-1135-5.
8
Variation in post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer across colonoscopy providers in English National Health Service: population based cohort study.英国国家医疗服务体系中结肠镜检查提供者之间结直肠癌的术后差异:基于人群的队列研究。
BMJ. 2019 Nov 13;367:l6090. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l6090.
9
Impact of introducing a faecal immunochemical test (FIT) for haemoglobin into primary care on the outcome of patients with new bowel symptoms: a prospective cohort study.在基层医疗中引入粪便血红蛋白免疫化学检测(FIT)对新发肠道症状患者结局的影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2019 May 4;6(1):e000293. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2019-000293. eCollection 2019.
10
Service evaluation of faecal immunochemical testing and anaemia for risk stratification in the 2-week-wait pathway for colorectal cancer.粪便免疫化学检测和贫血用于结直肠癌 2 周等待路径风险分层的服务评估。
BJS Open. 2019 Jan 28;3(3):395-402. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50131. eCollection 2019 Jun.