• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血小板增多有助于对通过两周等待路径转诊的结直肠癌患者的风险进行分层。

Thrombocytosis helps to stratify risk of colorectal cancer in patients referred on a 2-week-wait pathway.

作者信息

Bailey J A, Hanbali N, Premji K, Bunce J, Mashlab S, Simpson J A, Humes D J, Banerjea A

机构信息

Nottingham Colorectal Service, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, E Floor West Block, QMC Campus, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.

Department of Clinical Chemistry, City Hospital, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK.

出版信息

Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020 Jul;35(7):1347-1350. doi: 10.1007/s00384-020-03597-9. Epub 2020 May 1.

DOI:10.1007/s00384-020-03597-9
PMID:32358719
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7320058/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Primary care studies suggest that thrombocytosis (platelet counts > 400 × 10/L) is associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). We aimed to establish whether this marker has significant stratification value in patients seen in secondary care.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 2991 patients referred to our colorectal 2-week-wait (2WW) pathway between August 2014 and August 2017. Patient demographics were recorded prospectively, and local electronic records systems were used to retrieve full blood counts (FBC) and cancer diagnoses. Patients with no recent platelet count at the time of referral or incomplete records were excluded.

RESULTS

2236 patients were included in this evaluation. There was no significant difference in the age distribution of those with thrombocytosis and those without. There were significantly more females in the thrombocytosis group (72.1% vs 53.9%, chi-squared 24.63, p < 0.0001). 130 CRCs were detected (5.8%) and patients with thrombocytosis were more likely to have CRC (OR 2.62, 95% CI 1.60-4.30). The CRC diagnosis rate was significantly higher in females with thrombocytosis (10.3% vs 2.9%, chi-squared 19.41, p < 0.0001) and males with thrombocytosis (16.1% vs 7.9%, chi-squared 4.62, p = 0.032).

CONCLUSION

Thrombocytosis appears to have stratification value in the 2WW population. Further evaluation of its value alone or in combination with other stratification tests is required.

摘要

目的

基层医疗研究表明,血小板增多症(血小板计数>400×10⁹/L)与结直肠癌(CRC)风险增加相关。我们旨在确定该标志物在二级医疗中的患者是否具有显著的分层价值。

方法

对2014年8月至2017年8月转诊至我们结直肠两周等待(2WW)路径的2991例患者进行回顾性研究。前瞻性记录患者人口统计学资料,并使用当地电子记录系统检索全血细胞计数(FBC)和癌症诊断信息。排除转诊时无近期血小板计数或记录不完整的患者。

结果

本评估纳入2236例患者。血小板增多症患者和非血小板增多症患者的年龄分布无显著差异。血小板增多症组女性明显更多(72.1%对53.9%,卡方值24.63,p<0.0001)。检测到130例结直肠癌(5.8%),血小板增多症患者患结直肠癌的可能性更大(比值比2.62,95%置信区间1.60 - 4.30)。血小板增多症女性的结直肠癌诊断率显著更高(10.3%对2.9%,卡方值19.41,p<0.0001),血小板增多症男性的诊断率也更高(16.1%对7.9%,卡方值4.62,p = 0.032)。

结论

血小板增多症在2WW人群中似乎具有分层价值。需要进一步评估其单独或与其他分层检测联合的价值。

相似文献

1
Thrombocytosis helps to stratify risk of colorectal cancer in patients referred on a 2-week-wait pathway.血小板增多有助于对通过两周等待路径转诊的结直肠癌患者的风险进行分层。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020 Jul;35(7):1347-1350. doi: 10.1007/s00384-020-03597-9. Epub 2020 May 1.
2
Anaemia as a risk stratification tool for symptomatic patients referred via the two-week wait pathway for colorectal cancer.贫血作为通过两周等待途径转诊的结直肠癌有症状患者的风险分层工具。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018 May;100(5):350-356. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2018.0030. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
3
Is there a role for pre-operative thrombocytosis in the management of colorectal cancer?术前血小板增多症在结直肠癌治疗中的作用如何?
Int J Surg. 2010;8(6):436-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.05.005. Epub 2010 Jun 4.
4
Clinical relevance of thrombocytosis in primary care: a prospective cohort study of cancer incidence using English electronic medical records and cancer registry data.基层医疗中血小板增多症的临床相关性:一项利用英国电子病历和癌症登记数据对癌症发病率进行的前瞻性队列研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2017 Jun;67(659):e405-e413. doi: 10.3399/bjgp17X691109.
5
[Evaluation of thrombocytosis as predictive factor in colorectal cancer].[血小板增多症作为结直肠癌预测因素的评估]
Magy Seb. 2013 Dec;66(6):331-7. doi: 10.1556/MaSeb.66.2013.6.5.
6
The pretreatment thrombocytosis may predict prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.治疗前血小板增多症可能预测结直肠癌患者的预后:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Biomark Med. 2017 Feb;11(2):195-210. doi: 10.2217/bmm-2016-0214. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
7
Thrombocytosis Portends Adverse Prognosis in Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of 5,619 Patients in 16 Individual Studies.血小板增多症预示着结直肠癌的不良预后:对16项独立研究中5619例患者的荟萃分析
Anticancer Res. 2017 Sep;37(9):4717-4726. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.11878.
8
Relationship of postoperative thrombocytosis and survival of patients with colorectal cancer.结直肠癌患者术后血小板增多与生存的关系。
Int J Surg. 2015 Jun;18:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.03.005. Epub 2015 Apr 3.
9
The "two-week wait" referral pathway is not associated with improved survival for patients with colorectal cancer.“两周等待”转诊途径与结直肠癌患者的生存改善无关。
Int J Surg. 2017 Jul;43:181-185. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.05.046. Epub 2017 Jun 6.
10
Impact of preoperative thrombocytosis on the survival of patients with primary colorectal cancer.术前血小板增多对原发性结直肠癌患者生存的影响。
World J Surg. 2012 Jan;36(1):192-200. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1329-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Faecal immunochemical testing and blood tests for prioritization of urgent colorectal cancer referrals in symptomatic patients: a 2-year evaluation.粪便免疫化学检测和血液检测在有症状患者中对紧急结直肠癌转诊的优先排序:为期 2 年的评估。
BJS Open. 2021 Mar 5;5(2). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraa056.

本文引用的文献

1
Early clinical outcomes of a rapid colorectal cancer diagnosis pathway using faecal immunochemical testing in Nottingham.使用粪便免疫化学检测在诺丁汉快速诊断结直肠癌的早期临床结果。
Colorectal Dis. 2020 Jun;22(6):679-688. doi: 10.1111/codi.14944. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
2
Colorectal cancer screening with faecal immunochemical testing, sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy: a clinical practice guideline.粪便免疫化学检测、乙状结肠镜检查或结肠镜检查筛查结直肠癌:临床实践指南。
BMJ. 2019 Oct 2;367:l5515. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5515.
3
Service evaluation of faecal immunochemical testing and anaemia for risk stratification in the 2-week-wait pathway for colorectal cancer.粪便免疫化学检测和贫血用于结直肠癌 2 周等待路径风险分层的服务评估。
BJS Open. 2019 Jan 28;3(3):395-402. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50131. eCollection 2019 Jun.
4
Participant-Related Risk Factors for False-Positive and False-Negative Fecal Immunochemical Tests in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.参与者相关的粪便免疫化学检测在结直肠癌筛查中的假阳性和假阴性的危险因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2018 Dec;113(12):1778-1787. doi: 10.1038/s41395-018-0212-7. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
5
Anaemia as a risk stratification tool for symptomatic patients referred via the two-week wait pathway for colorectal cancer.贫血作为通过两周等待途径转诊的结直肠癌有症状患者的风险分层工具。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018 May;100(5):350-356. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2018.0030. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
6
Clinical relevance of thrombocytosis in primary care: a prospective cohort study of cancer incidence using English electronic medical records and cancer registry data.基层医疗中血小板增多症的临床相关性:一项利用英国电子病历和癌症登记数据对癌症发病率进行的前瞻性队列研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2017 Jun;67(659):e405-e413. doi: 10.3399/bjgp17X691109.
7
Straight-to-test colonoscopy for 2-week-wait referrals improves time to diagnosis of colorectal cancer and is feasible in a high-volume unit.直接进行 2 周等待期内转介的结肠镜检查可提高结直肠癌的诊断时间,并且在高容量单位中是可行的。
Colorectal Dis. 2017 Sep;19(9):819-826. doi: 10.1111/codi.13667.
8
The fecal hemoglobin concentration, age and sex test score: Development and external validation of a simple prediction tool for colorectal cancer detection in symptomatic patients.粪便血红蛋白浓度、年龄和性别测试评分:用于症状性患者结直肠癌检测的简单预测工具的开发和外部验证。
Int J Cancer. 2017 May 15;140(10):2201-2211. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30639. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
9
Identifying patients with suspected colorectal cancer in primary care: derivation and validation of an algorithm.在初级保健中识别疑似结直肠癌患者:算法的推导和验证。
Br J Gen Pract. 2012 Jan;62(594):e29-37. doi: 10.3399/bjgp12X616346.
10
Interventions to reduce primary care delay in cancer referral: a systematic review.干预措施以减少癌症转诊的初级保健延误:系统评价。
Br J Gen Pract. 2011 Dec;61(593):e821-35. doi: 10.3399/bjgp11X613160.