• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院未能推广儿童约束装置的使用。

Failure of hospitals to promote the use of child restraint devices.

作者信息

Decker M D, Bolton G A, Dewey M J, Smith G, Schaffner W

机构信息

Department of Preventive Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232.

出版信息

Am J Dis Child. 1988 Jun;142(6):656-8. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1988.02150060090039.

DOI:10.1001/archpedi.1988.02150060090039
PMID:3369405
Abstract

Motor vehicle accidents are the leading cause of death in children. In 1977, Tennessee adopted the nation's first law requiring the use of child restraint devices (CRDs), but despite extensive promotional efforts, a majority of young children still travel unrestrained. We surveyed all acute-care hospitals in Tennessee to determine their policies regarding CRDs. Of 109 hospitals with obstetric services, 28 (26%) had a policy calling for discharged newborns to be transported in CRDs; only seven (5%) of 128 pediatric services had such a policy. It is time for hospitals and professional organizations to adopt policies to ensure that the parents of every child discharged from an obstetric or pediatric unit are educated concerning CRD use laws and are able to comply with them. Pediatricians should consider incorporating "discharge in child restraint device" into their routine discharge orders.

摘要

机动车事故是儿童死亡的主要原因。1977年,田纳西州通过了美国第一部要求使用儿童约束装置(CRD)的法律,但尽管进行了广泛的宣传努力,仍有大多数幼儿乘车时未使用约束装置。我们对田纳西州所有急症护理医院进行了调查,以确定它们关于CRD的政策。在109家设有产科服务的医院中,有28家(26%)制定了要求新生儿出院时使用CRD运送的政策;在128家儿科服务机构中,只有7家(5%)有这样的政策。现在是医院和专业组织制定政策,以确保从产科或儿科病房出院的每个孩子的父母都了解CRD使用法律并能够遵守这些法律的时候了。儿科医生应考虑将“使用儿童约束装置出院”纳入其常规出院医嘱。

相似文献

1
Failure of hospitals to promote the use of child restraint devices.医院未能推广儿童约束装置的使用。
Am J Dis Child. 1988 Jun;142(6):656-8. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1988.02150060090039.
2
Feasibility of providing child restraint devices after a motor vehicle crash in a pediatric emergency department.在儿科急诊科对机动车碰撞事故后的儿童提供约束装置的可行性。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2018;19(8):844-848. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2018.1496243. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
3
Child restraint law effects on motor vehicle accident fatalities and injuries: the New Mexico experience.儿童约束法对机动车事故伤亡情况的影响:新墨西哥州的经验
Pediatrics. 1986 Dec;78(6):1079-84.
4
The use and efficacy of child restraint devices. The Tennessee experience, 1982 and 1983.儿童约束装置的使用与效果。田纳西州的经验,1982年和1983年。
JAMA. 1984 Nov 9;252(18):2571-5.
5
Promoting hospital discharge of infants in safety seats.促进婴儿乘坐安全座椅出院。
J Community Health. 1995 Aug;20(4):345-57. doi: 10.1007/BF02283059.
6
[The contribution of biomechanics to the safety of children inside motor vehicles].[生物力学对机动车内儿童安全的贡献]
Ann Pediatr (Paris). 1992 Mar;39(3):165-73.
7
The case of mandatory seat restraint laws.
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1981 Apr;20(4):285-90. doi: 10.1177/000992288102000409.
8
Malaysian Child Restraint Issues: A Brief Narrative Review.马来西亚儿童约束装置问题:简要叙述性回顾。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 16;17(6):1922. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17061922.
9
Effect of seating position and restraint use on injuries to children in motor vehicle crashes.乘车位置及使用约束装置对儿童在机动车碰撞事故中受伤情况的影响。
Pediatrics. 2000 Apr;105(4 Pt 1):831-5. doi: 10.1542/peds.105.4.831.
10
Motor Vehicle Crashes, Medical Outcomes, and Hospital Charges Among Children Aged 1-12 Years - Crash Outcome Data Evaluation System, 11 States, 2005-2008.1-12 岁儿童机动车事故、医疗结局和医院费用 - 事故结局数据评估系统,11 个州,2005-2008 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2015 Oct 2;64(8):1-32. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6408a1.

引用本文的文献

1
Promoting hospital discharge of infants in safety seats.促进婴儿乘坐安全座椅出院。
J Community Health. 1995 Aug;20(4):345-57. doi: 10.1007/BF02283059.