Northeastern University Bouvè College of Health Sciences, Boston, MA, USA.
Washtenaw Health Plan, Ypsilanti, MI, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Sep;36(9):2563-2570. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06664-1. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
Emergency department (ED) visits contribute substantially to health care expenditures. Case management has been proposed as a strategy to address the medical and social needs of complex patients. However, strong research designs to evaluate the effectiveness of such interventions are limited.
To evaluate whether a community-based case management program was associated with reduced ED utilization among complex patients.
Patients whose risk exceeded a threshold were randomly assigned to a group offered case management or to the control group. Assignment occurred at five intervals between November 2017 and January 2019. Program effectiveness for all assigned patients was assessed using an intention-to-treat effect. Program effectiveness among those who received treatment was assessed using a local average treatment effect, estimated using instrumental variables. Both estimators were adjusted for baseline characteristics using linear models.
Adults over age 18 with at least one health care encounter with Michigan Medicine or St. Joseph Mercy Health System between June 2, 2016, and November 27, 2018.
Intervention arm participants (n = 486) were offered coordinated case management across medical, mental health, and social service organizations. Control arm participants (n = 409) received usual care.
The primary outcome was the number of ED visits in the 6 months following randomization into the study. Secondary outcomes were 6-month counts of inpatient and outpatient visits.
Of the 486 patients assigned to the intervention, 131 (27%) consented to receive case management. The intention-to-treat effect on ED visits was + 0.14 (95% CI: - 0.27 to + 0.55). The local average treatment effect among those who consented and received case management was + 0.53 (95% CI: - 1.00 to + 2.05). Intention-to-treat and local average treatment effects were not significant for secondary outcomes.
The community case management intervention targeting ED visits was not associated with reduced utilization. Future case management interventions may benefit from additional patient engagement strategies and longer evaluation time periods.
Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03293160.
急诊科(ED)就诊对医疗支出有重大影响。病例管理已被提议作为一种策略,以满足复杂患者的医疗和社会需求。然而,评估此类干预措施有效性的强有力的研究设计有限。
评估基于社区的病例管理计划是否与减少复杂患者的 ED 就诊次数有关。
风险超过阈值的患者被随机分配到接受病例管理的组或对照组。分配发生在 2017 年 11 月至 2019 年 1 月之间的五个时间间隔内。所有分配患者的计划有效性均使用意向治疗效果进行评估。使用工具变量估计的局部平均治疗效果评估了接受治疗的患者的计划有效性。两种估计量均使用线性模型根据基线特征进行调整。
2016 年 6 月 2 日至 2018 年 11 月 27 日期间在密歇根医学或圣约瑟夫慈悲健康系统至少有一次医疗保健就诊的 18 岁以上成年人。
干预组参与者(n=486)接受了医疗、心理健康和社会服务组织的协调病例管理。对照组参与者(n=409)接受了常规护理。
主要结局是随机分组后 6 个月内 ED 就诊次数。次要结局是 6 个月的住院和门诊就诊次数。
在被分配到干预组的 486 名患者中,有 131 名(27%)同意接受病例管理。ED 就诊的意向治疗效果为+0.14(95%CI:-0.27 至 +0.55)。同意并接受病例管理的患者的局部平均治疗效果为+0.53(95%CI:-1.00 至 +2.05)。意向治疗和局部平均治疗效果对次要结局均无统计学意义。
针对 ED 就诊的社区病例管理干预措施与减少就诊次数无关。未来的病例管理干预措施可能受益于额外的患者参与策略和更长的评估时间。
Clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT03293160。