Peer review and the evaluation of manuscripts.
作者信息
Crawford S
机构信息
Washington University.
出版信息
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1988 Jan;76(1):75-7.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Peer review and the evaluation of manuscripts.同行评审与稿件评估
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1988 Jan;76(1):75-7.
2
Peer review time: how late is late in a small medical journal?
Arch Med Res. 2003 Sep-Oct;34(5):439-43. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2003.07.001.
3
On bargains ..
Image J Nurs Sch. 1990 Spring;22(1):2.
4
Preserving blind peer review of electronic manuscript files.保留电子稿件文件的盲审制度。
Nurse Author Ed. 2005 Winter;15(1):1-4, 7.
5
6
Lesson from fate of rejected paper.
Indian Pediatr. 2011 May;48(5):410.
7
[Peer review of scientific manuscripts should be open and referees' bias should be accounted for].科学手稿的同行评审应该公开，并且应该考虑评审人员的偏见。
Lakartidningen. 2004 Oct 28;101(44):3458.
8
[Electronic manuscripts: the periodicals earn money, the referees pay].
Lakartidningen. 2005;102(11):888.
9
Search, strategy, policy and provision.搜索、策略、政策与供给。
Health Info Libr J. 2009 Dec;26(4):259. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00872.x.
本文引用的文献
1
Evaluation of manuscripts in health sciences librarianship.健康科学图书馆学领域稿件评估
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1979 Oct;67(4):365-8.
Zotero 插件