Department of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, University Cologne Hospital, Cologne, Germany.
Br J Neurosurg. 2022 Oct;36(5):555-563. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2021.1884189. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
Peripheral vascular disease (PVD) is caused by a blood circulation disorder of the arteries and Critical Limb Ischemia (CLI) is the advanced state of PVD. For patients with surgically non-reconstructable CLI, Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) appears to be an alternative therapeutic option.
The aim of our study was to investigate the efficacy of SCS in non-reconstructable CLI compared with the conservative treatment and re-appraise the existing literature in light of the recent advances in neuromodulation.
We conducted a systematic review based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, using electronic databases and reference lists for article retrieval.
A total of 404 records were identified and finally 6 randomised controlled trials (RCTs), a Cochrane review and a meta-analysis were included in our systematic review. The studies assessed the efficacy of tonic SCS in the treatment of patients with non-reconstructable CLI compared with the conservative treatment. There is moderate to high quality evidence suggesting, that tonic SCS has beneficial effects for patients suffering from non-reconstructable CLI in terms of limb salvage, pain relief, clinical improvement and quality of life. The contradictory conclusions of the two meta-analyses regarding the efficacy of SCS for limb salvage at 12 months refer rather to the magnitude of the beneficial effect than to the effect itself. So far, the current literature provides evidence about the traditional tonic SCS but there is a lack of studies investigating the efficacy of new waveforms in the treatment of non-reconstructable CLI.
SCS represents an alternative for PVD patients with non-reconstructable CLI and the existing literature provides encouraging clinical results, that should not be neglected. Instead, they should be re-appraised in light of the recent advances in neuromodulation with the emergence of novel waveform technologies and neuromodulation targets.
周围血管疾病(PVD)是由动脉血液循环紊乱引起的,而严重肢体缺血(CLI)是 PVD 的晚期阶段。对于手术无法重建的 CLI 患者,脊髓刺激(SCS)似乎是一种替代治疗选择。
我们的研究旨在调查 SCS 在非重建性 CLI 中的疗效,与保守治疗相比,并根据神经调节的最新进展重新评估现有文献。
我们根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行了系统评价,使用电子数据库和参考文献列表检索文章。
共确定了 404 条记录,最终纳入了 6 项随机对照试验(RCT)、1 项 Cochrane 综述和 1 项荟萃分析。这些研究评估了强直 SCS 在治疗非重建性 CLI 患者方面与保守治疗相比的疗效。有中等至高质量的证据表明,强直 SCS 对非重建性 CLI 患者在肢体挽救、疼痛缓解、临床改善和生活质量方面有有益的影响。两项荟萃分析关于 SCS 治疗 12 个月时肢体挽救效果的矛盾结论,更多地是指有益效果的大小,而不是效果本身。到目前为止,现有文献提供了关于传统强直 SCS 的证据,但缺乏研究调查新型波形在治疗非重建性 CLI 中的疗效。
SCS 是治疗非重建性 CLI 的 PVD 患者的一种替代方法,现有文献提供了令人鼓舞的临床结果,不应被忽视。相反,应根据神经调节的最新进展,重新评估它们,包括新型波形技术和神经调节靶点的出现。