Ramakrishna Shashikala, Moore Matthew, Davies Elaine, Merry Alan Forbes, Sleigh Jamie, Jowsey Tanisha
Department of Anaesthesiology, The University of Auckland Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Auckland, New Zealand
Department of Anaesthesiology, The University of Auckland Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Auckland, New Zealand.
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 24;15(3):e082840. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082840.
To explore the short-term and long-term lived experiences of patients with chronic pain and angina pectoris with spinal cord stimulation.
An interpretive qualitative study with thematic analysis of one-off, semistructured interviews, following Braun and Clarke (2006).
A multidisciplinary, publicly funded pain service in Auckland, New Zealand. Patients usually undergo a comprehensive medical, psychological and functional assessment and an in-house pain management programme before proceeding to spinal cord stimulator implantation.
Participants implanted with a spinal cord stimulator between 1998 and 2019 who had their stimulator for ≥1 year, purposively sampled to increase the range of ethnicities.
The themes identified from the interviews.
24 participants with chronic pain of varied aetiology and a median (range) of 5.2 (2.4-23.2) years since stimulator implantation participated. 22 participants had the device in situ, and 2 had been explanted. Five main themes were identified: (1) embodiment: stimulator and body as one; (2) technical factors: batteries and type of stimulation; (3) improved well-being; (4) social connection and (5) healthcare system interaction. Most participants reported pain relief, but many had experienced complications and discomfort. They emphasised the importance of ongoing support from the pain service. Acceptance of pain, coping and embodiment emerged as common motifs across these themes. 21 participants were satisfied with their treatment.
Within the context of a multidisciplinary pain clinic, despite some discomfort and various complications, most participants valued the ongoing reduction of pain achieved with spinal cord stimulation. Timely access to support from the pain service influenced their experience and satisfaction with their stimulators. Acceptance of pain and embodiment of the stimulator helped participants adapt to living with their stimulator, often over many years.
探讨慢性疼痛和心绞痛患者接受脊髓刺激治疗的短期和长期生活体验。
采用解释性定性研究,依据布劳恩和克拉克(2006年)的方法对一次性半结构化访谈进行主题分析。
新西兰奥克兰一家由公共资金资助的多学科疼痛服务机构。患者在进行脊髓刺激器植入前通常要接受全面的医学、心理和功能评估以及内部疼痛管理项目。
1998年至2019年间植入脊髓刺激器且刺激器使用时间≥1年的参与者,采用目的抽样以增加种族多样性。
访谈中确定的主题。
24名病因各异的慢性疼痛患者参与研究,自刺激器植入以来的中位时间(范围)为5.2(2.4 - 23.2)年。22名参与者的刺激器仍在原位,2名已取出。确定了五个主要主题:(1)身体体验:刺激器与身体融为一体;(2)技术因素:电池与刺激类型;(3)幸福感提升;(4)社会联系;(5)与医疗系统的互动。大多数参与者报告疼痛缓解,但许多人经历过并发症和不适。他们强调疼痛服务持续支持的重要性。接受疼痛、应对及身体体验是贯穿这些主题的共同主题。21名参与者对治疗感到满意。
在多学科疼痛诊所的背景下,尽管存在一些不适和各种并发症,但大多数参与者重视脊髓刺激治疗带来的持续疼痛减轻。及时获得疼痛服务的支持影响了他们对刺激器的体验和满意度。接受疼痛和将刺激器融入身体帮助参与者适应了多年来带着刺激器的生活。