School of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China.
Key Laboratory of Brain, Cognition and Education Sciences (South China Normal University), Ministry of Education.
J Pers Assess. 2021 Nov-Dec;103(6):797-806. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2021.1887201. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
This study aims to simultaneously compare the psychometric properties and examine the factor structures of 3 emotion regulation (ER) strategy scales using a bifactor approach. Due to good reliability and validity, extensive use, and the same scoring method, the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale, and Regulatory Emotional Self-Efficacy Scale were used to assess ER strategies in 1,036 Chinese respondents. A bifactor confirmatory factor analysis was designed to address the multidimensionality of the factor structure, and the corresponding bifactor structures were then applied in a subsequent bifactor multidimensional item response theory (MIRT) analysis. Finally, bifactor MIRT was used to compare the psychometric properties of the 3 measures. The results indicated that bifactor structures were appropriate for the 3 ER strategy measures, which performed well overall. Different measures provide the highest accuracy for specific groups and designs. Some strengths and limitations of this article are discussed.
本研究旨在采用双因素分析法同时比较三种情绪调节（ER）策略量表的心理测量学特性并检验其因子结构。由于信度和效度良好、应用广泛以及评分方法相同，本研究采用认知情绪调节问卷、情绪调节困难量表和情绪自我效能感量表来评估 1036 名中国被试的 ER 策略。本研究设计了双因素验证性因子分析来解决因子结构的多维性问题，然后将相应的双因素结构应用于后续的双因素多维项目反应理论（MIRT）分析中。最后，采用双因素 MIRT 比较了三种测量方法的心理测量学特性。结果表明，双因素结构适用于三种 ER 策略量表，总体表现良好。不同的测量方法为特定群体和设计提供了最高的准确性。本文讨论了一些优点和局限性。
