Suppr超能文献

五种姿势(行走、坐姿、弯腰、跪地和下蹲)下的中子外照射剂量换算系数。

Dose conversion coefficients for neutron external exposures with five postures: walking, sitting, bending, kneeling, and squatting.

机构信息

Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA.

Department of Nuclear Engineering, Hanyang University, 222 Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, 04763, Korea.

出版信息

Radiat Environ Biophys. 2021 May;60(2):317-328. doi: 10.1007/s00411-021-00900-2. Epub 2021 Mar 11.

Abstract

In a previous study, posture-dependent dose coefficients (DCs) for photon external exposures were calculated using the adult male and female mesh-type reference computational phantoms (MRCPs) of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) that had been transformed into five non-standing postures (i.e. walking, sitting, bending, kneeling, and squatting). As an extension, the present study was conducted to establish another DC dataset for external exposures to neutrons by performing Monte Carlo radiation transport simulations with the adult male and female MRCPs in the five non-standing postures. The resulting dataset included the DCs for absorbed doses (i.e., organ/tissue-averaged absorbed doses) delivered to 29 individual organs/tissues, and for effective doses for neutron energies ranging from 10 to 10 MeV in six irradiation geometries: antero-posterior (AP), posteroanterior (PA), left-lateral (LLAT), right-lateral (RLAT), rotational (ROT), and isotropic (ISO) geometries. The comparison of DCs for the non-standing MRCPs with those of the standing MRCPs showed significant differences. In the lateral irradiation geometries, for example, the standing MRCPs overestimate the breast DCs of the squatting MRCPs by up to a factor of 4 due to the different arm positions but underestimate the gonad DCs by up to about 17 times due to the different leg positions. The impact of different postures on effective doses was generally less than that on organ doses but still significant; for example, the standing MRCPs overestimate the effective doses of the bending MRCPs only by 20% in the AP geometry at neutron energies less than 50 MeV, but underestimate those of the kneeling MRCPs by up to 40% in the lateral geometries at energies less than 0.1 MeV.

摘要

在之前的研究中,使用国际辐射防护委员会(ICRP)的成年男性和女性网格型参考计算体模(MRCP),这些体模已转化为五个非站立姿势(即行走、坐、弯、跪和蹲),计算了光子外照射的与姿势相关的剂量系数(DC)。作为扩展,本研究通过对五个非站立姿势中的成年男性和女性 MRCP 进行蒙特卡罗辐射传输模拟,建立了另一个用于外照射中子的 DC 数据集。该数据集包括 29 个器官/组织的吸收剂量(即器官/组织平均吸收剂量)和有效剂量的 DC,以及六种照射几何形状(前后向、后前向、左侧向、右侧向、旋转和各向同性)中 10 到 10 MeV 能量范围内的有效剂量。非站立 MRCP 的 DC 与站立 MRCP 的 DC 进行比较,结果显示出显著差异。例如,在侧向照射几何形状中,由于手臂位置的不同,站立 MRCP 高估了蹲姿 MRCP 的乳房 DC,最高可达 4 倍,但由于腿部位置的不同,低估了性腺 DC,最高可达 17 倍左右。不同姿势对有效剂量的影响通常小于对器官剂量的影响,但仍然显著;例如,在低于 50 MeV 的中子能量下,AP 几何形状中站立 MRCP 高估了弯曲 MRCP 的有效剂量,仅高出 20%,但在低于 0.1 MeV 的能量下,在侧向几何形状中,站立 MRCP 低估了跪姿 MRCP 的有效剂量,最高可达 40%。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验