• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

鼻腔-牙槽塑形术:评估护理负担。

Nasoalveolar Molding: Assessing the Burden of Care.

机构信息

Division of Plastic and Maxillofacial Surgery, Children's Hospital Los Angeles.

Division of Plastic and Maxillofacial Surgery, Keck School of Medicine.

出版信息

J Craniofac Surg. 2021;32(2):574-577. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000007026.

DOI:10.1097/SCS.0000000000007026
PMID:33704983
Abstract

Over the last 3 years a shift at our institution has taken place in which patients who would have been offered nasoalveolar molding (NAM) as an adjunct to cleft lip repair (repair after 3 months) have instead undergone early cleft lip repair (ECLR) (2-5 weeks of life) without NAM. This study sought to examine the financial and social impact of the transition away from NAM to ECLR. The efficacy of NAM is limited by patient compliance to a rigorous treatment schedule requiring weekly visits for appliance adjustments. Nasoalveolar molding patients required an average of 11 dental visits, accounting for $2132 in indirect lost income per family. Average direct charges for NAM totaled $12,290 for the hospital, physician, and appliance costs. Over the entire study period, the cumulative direct cost of NAM separate from the surgical repair of the lip was $970,910. Following the introduction of ECLR as an alternative to NAM with standard lip repair, NAM usage decreased by 48% and unilateral cleft lip patients undergoing NAM decreased by 86%. Those diverted from NAM to ECLR resulted in a decreased healthcare cost burden of $368,700 ($111,727 per year). In addition to the time burden, the financial burden of NAM is significant. Early cleft lip repair without NAM is more cost effective. Nasoalveolar molding has significantly decreased utilization since the implementation of ECLR. We believe that ECLR, with increased experience, long-term data, and increased awareness, has the potential to decrease the burden of health care costs in the United States.

摘要

在过去的 3 年中,我们机构发生了转变,以前接受过鼻牙槽塑形术(NAM)治疗的患者,该手术是作为唇裂修复术(3 个月后)的辅助手段,现在转而接受早期唇裂修复术(ECLR)(出生后 2-5 周),但没有接受 NAM。本研究旨在探讨从 NAM 到 ECLR 的转变对财务和社会的影响。NAM 的疗效受到患者对每周进行一次器械调整的严格治疗方案的依从性的限制。接受 NAM 的患者平均需要 11 次牙科就诊,每个家庭的间接收入损失为 2132 美元。NAM 的平均直接费用总计为 12290 美元,包括医院、医生和器械费用。在整个研究期间,NAM 的直接成本(不包括唇裂的手术修复)总计为 970910 美元。在引入 ECLR 作为 NAM 替代方案以治疗标准唇裂后,NAM 的使用率下降了 48%,接受 NAM 的单侧唇裂患者下降了 86%。从 NAM 转用 ECLR 可减少 368700 美元的医疗保健费用负担(每年 111727 美元)。除了时间负担外,NAM 的财务负担也很沉重。不使用 NAM 进行早期唇裂修复更具成本效益。自 ECLR 实施以来,NAM 的使用率显著下降。我们相信,随着经验的增加、长期数据的积累以及意识的提高,ECLR 有可能降低美国医疗保健成本的负担。

相似文献

1
Nasoalveolar Molding: Assessing the Burden of Care.鼻腔-牙槽塑形术:评估护理负担。
J Craniofac Surg. 2021;32(2):574-577. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000007026.
2
Rethinking the Rule of 10s: Early Cleft Lip Repair Improves Weight Gain.重新审视“十法则”:早期唇裂修复可改善体重增加情况。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2023 Mar;60(3):306-312. doi: 10.1177/10556656211062042. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
3
Presurgical Orthopedic Intervention Prior to Cleft Lip and Palate Repair: Nasoalveolar Molding Versus Passive Molding Appliance Therapy.术前矫形干预在唇腭裂修复前:鼻牙槽塑形与被动矫正器治疗。
J Craniofac Surg. 2021;32(2):486-491. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006929.
4
Does Early Referral Lead to Early Repair? Quality Improvement in Cleft Care.早期转介是否能实现早期修复?唇腭裂治疗中的质量改进。
Ann Plast Surg. 2023 May 1;90(5S Suppl 3):S312-S314. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003399. Epub 2023 Apr 1.
5
Lessons Learned from a Single Institution's Eight Years of Experience with Early Cleft Lip Repair.从单机构八年的早期唇裂修复经验中吸取的教训。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Sep 28;59(10):1741. doi: 10.3390/medicina59101741.
6
Effectiveness of a Novel 3D-Printed Nasoalveolar Molding Appliance (D-NAM) on Improving the Maxillary Arch Dimensions in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Infants: A Randomized Controlled Trial.新型 3D 打印鼻牙槽塑形矫治器(D-NAM)改善单侧唇腭裂婴儿上颌弓宽度的效果:一项随机对照试验。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2020 Dec;57(12):1370-1381. doi: 10.1177/1055665620954321. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
7
Effectiveness of Presurgical Nasoalveolar Molding Appliance in Infants With Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate.术前鼻牙槽塑形矫治器在单侧完全性唇腭裂婴儿中的疗效。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2022 Aug;59(8):995-1000. doi: 10.1177/10556656211026493. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
8
The impact of passive alveolar molding vs. nasoalveolar molding on cleft width and other parameters of maxillary growth in unilateral cleft lip palate.被动式肺泡塑形术与鼻牙槽塑形术对单侧唇腭裂上颌骨生长中裂隙宽度和其他参数的影响。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Sep;27(9):5001-5009. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05119-7. Epub 2023 Jun 23.
9
A modified nasoalveolar molding technique for correction of unilateral cleft nose deformity.一种用于矫正单侧唇裂鼻畸形的改良鼻牙槽塑形技术。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015 Dec;43(10):2100-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.10.003. Epub 2015 Oct 13.
10
A Comparative Cost Analysis of Cleft Lip Adhesion and Nasoalveolar Molding before Formal Cleft Lip Repair.唇裂修复术前唇粘连与鼻牙槽塑形的成本比较分析
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Dec;136(6):1264-1271. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31829b69fe.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality and content assessment of internet information on nasoalveolar molding.关于鼻牙槽塑形的互联网信息的质量与内容评估
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jan 30;25(1):389. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21616-8.
2
Complete Digital Workflow for Manufacturing Presurgical Orthodontic Palatal Plates in Newborns and Infants with Cleft Lip and/or Palate.唇腭裂新生儿及婴儿术前正畸腭板制造的完整数字工作流程
J Funct Biomater. 2024 Oct 8;15(10):301. doi: 10.3390/jfb15100301.
3
Lessons Learned from a Single Institution's Eight Years of Experience with Early Cleft Lip Repair.
从单机构八年的早期唇裂修复经验中吸取的教训。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Sep 28;59(10):1741. doi: 10.3390/medicina59101741.
4
A Point-of-Care Digital Workflow for 3D Printed Passive Presurgical Orthopedic Plates in Cleft Care.用于唇腭裂治疗中3D打印被动式术前矫形钢板的床旁数字工作流程。
Children (Basel). 2022 Aug 20;9(8):1261. doi: 10.3390/children9081261.
5
The Burden of Care in Nasoalveolar Molding Treatment in Cleft Patients.腭裂患者鼻牙槽塑形治疗中的护理负担
Indian J Plast Surg. 2022 Mar 10;55(1):87-91. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1744219. eCollection 2022 Feb.