• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腭裂患者鼻牙槽塑形治疗中的护理负担

The Burden of Care in Nasoalveolar Molding Treatment in Cleft Patients.

作者信息

Magyar Dominika, Nemes Bálint, Pálvölgyi Laura, Pulay Zoltán, Nagy Krisztián

机构信息

1st Department of Paediatrics, Semmelweis University School of Medicine, Budapest, Hungary.

Department of Paediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, Semmelweis University Faculty of Dentistry, Budapest, Hungary.

出版信息

Indian J Plast Surg. 2022 Mar 10;55(1):87-91. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1744219. eCollection 2022 Feb.

DOI:10.1055/s-0042-1744219
PMID:35444738
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9015833/
Abstract

This study, first in Hungary, examined the success of presurgical nasoalveolar molding (NAM) therapy in cleft patients from a caregiver's perspective and revealed factors that can cause inconvenience.  A survey-based study was performed using a 32-item questionnaire following NAM therapy. The survey was sent to families whose child underwent NAM therapy from 2010 until 2020 at the 1st Department of Paediatrics, Semmelweis University. The questions focused on four main parts: socioeconomic, origin of the cleft, difficulties of therapy, and self-assessment. Fifty-three families received the questionnaire, 17 of them completed it.  The mean age was 5 ± 3.7 weeks when NAM therapy started. Fifty-eight percent of the patients were male and 42% female. Patients are living more than 60 km from the cleft center (59%). Patients had to make the journey between their residence and the cleft center ∼10 to 15 times. In most cases, NAM therapy was covered by health insurance (83%). The unilateral cleft and lip palate occurred 58%, while the bilateral were 42%. Thirty-five percent of the patients had an allergic reaction against the adhesive, and 35% were affected by wounds on their lips or noses. The way of feeding was variable. Seventeen percent of the parents were able to breastfeed. In all cases, parents were satisfied with the NAM therapy.  The present study highlighted the value of caregivers' role in NAM therapy. The burden of care is acceptable, caregivers have high compliance, and are determined to help the effectiveness of therapy. Limitations of this study include a single-institute data with a small number of cases.

摘要

本研究首次在匈牙利从护理人员的角度探讨了术前鼻牙槽塑形(NAM)治疗在腭裂患者中的成效,并揭示了可能造成不便的因素。

在NAM治疗后,使用一份包含32个条目的问卷进行了一项基于调查的研究。该调查问卷被发送给2010年至2020年期间在塞梅尔维斯大学第一儿科接受NAM治疗的患儿家庭。问题主要集中在四个方面:社会经济状况、腭裂病因、治疗困难以及自我评估。53个家庭收到了问卷,其中17个家庭完成了问卷。

NAM治疗开始时的平均年龄为5±3.7周。58%的患者为男性,42%为女性。患者居住在距离腭裂治疗中心60多公里以外的地方(占59%)。患者在住所和腭裂治疗中心之间往返了约10至15次。在大多数情况下,NAM治疗费用由医疗保险支付(占83%)。单侧唇腭裂发生率为58%,双侧为42%。35%的患者对粘合剂有过敏反应,35%的患者嘴唇或鼻子有伤口。喂养方式各不相同。17%的父母能够进行母乳喂养。在所有情况下,父母对NAM治疗都很满意。

本研究突出了护理人员在NAM治疗中的作用价值。护理负担是可以接受的,护理人员的依从性很高,并决心帮助提高治疗效果。本研究的局限性包括单一机构的数据以及病例数量较少。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b18/9015833/4dc37d778c82/10-1055-s-0042-1744219-i2181430-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b18/9015833/0d049489210b/10-1055-s-0042-1744219-i2181430-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b18/9015833/4dc37d778c82/10-1055-s-0042-1744219-i2181430-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b18/9015833/0d049489210b/10-1055-s-0042-1744219-i2181430-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b18/9015833/4dc37d778c82/10-1055-s-0042-1744219-i2181430-2.jpg

相似文献

1
The Burden of Care in Nasoalveolar Molding Treatment in Cleft Patients.腭裂患者鼻牙槽塑形治疗中的护理负担
Indian J Plast Surg. 2022 Mar 10;55(1):87-91. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1744219. eCollection 2022 Feb.
2
Assessing Burden of Care in the Patient With Cleft Lip and Palate: Factors Influencing Completion and Noncompletion of Nasoalveolar Molding.评估唇腭裂患者的护理负担:影响鼻牙槽塑形完成与未完成的因素
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2019 Jul;56(6):759-765. doi: 10.1177/1055665618811526. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
3
Presurgical Orthopedic Intervention Prior to Cleft Lip and Palate Repair: Nasoalveolar Molding Versus Passive Molding Appliance Therapy.术前矫形干预在唇腭裂修复前:鼻牙槽塑形与被动矫正器治疗。
J Craniofac Surg. 2021;32(2):486-491. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006929.
4
The Burden of Care of Nasoalveolar Molding: An Institutional Experience.《鼻牙槽成型术的护理负担:机构经验》。
J Craniofac Surg. 2024;35(2):602-607. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000009960. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
5
Factors Associated With Adherence to Nasoalveolar Molding (NAM) by Caregivers of Infants Born With Cleft Lip and Palate.唇腭裂患儿 caregivers 对鼻牙槽塑形(NAM)依从性的相关因素。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018 Feb;55(2):252-258. doi: 10.1177/1055665617718550. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
6
NAM-help or burden? Intercultural evaluation of parental stress caused by nasoalveolar molding: a retrospective multi-center study.NAM 是助力还是负担?鼻牙槽塑形术所致父母压力的跨文化评估:一项回顾性多中心研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Sep;25(9):5421-5430. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-03850-7. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
7
Effectiveness of a Novel 3D-Printed Nasoalveolar Molding Appliance (D-NAM) on Improving the Maxillary Arch Dimensions in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Infants: A Randomized Controlled Trial.新型 3D 打印鼻牙槽塑形矫治器(D-NAM)改善单侧唇腭裂婴儿上颌弓宽度的效果:一项随机对照试验。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2020 Dec;57(12):1370-1381. doi: 10.1177/1055665620954321. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
8
Presurgical Nasoalveolar Molding Therapy Using Figueroa's NAM Technique in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients: A Preliminary Study.采用菲格罗亚鼻牙槽塑形技术对单侧唇腭裂患者进行术前鼻牙槽塑形治疗:一项初步研究。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016;40(5):410-6. doi: 10.17796/1053-4628-40.5.410.
9
Is presurgical nasoalveolar molding therapy more effective in unilateral or bilateral cleft lip-cleft palate patients?术前鼻牙槽塑形治疗在单侧或双侧唇腭裂患者中更有效吗?
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Mar;127(3):1263-1269. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318205f3ac.
10
Quantitative Evaluation of Nasolabial Alterations following Nasoalveolar Molding (NAM) Therapy in Patients with Unilateral Cleft Lip.单侧唇裂患者鼻牙槽塑形(NAM)治疗后鼻唇改变的定量评估
Facial Plast Surg. 2019 Feb;35(1):73-77. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1675633. Epub 2018 Dec 26.

引用本文的文献

1
A survey on nasoalveolar moulding treatment practices at cleft centres across India.一项关于印度各地腭裂治疗中心鼻牙槽塑形治疗实践的调查。
Front Surg. 2025 Mar 5;12:1526364. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1526364. eCollection 2025.
2
Perception, attitude, and opinion of parents of cleft lip and palate patients treated with nasoalveolar molding (NAM): A cross-sectional questionnaire study.接受鼻牙槽骨塑形(NAM)治疗的唇腭裂患者家长的认知、态度和看法:一项横断面问卷调查研究
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2025 Jul;35(4):698-707. doi: 10.1111/ipd.13279. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
3
Caregivers' Experience with Lip Taping as a Presurgical Orthopedic Treatment for Cleft Lip and Palate Defects.

本文引用的文献

1
Nasoalveolar Molding: Assessing the Burden of Care.鼻腔-牙槽塑形术:评估护理负担。
J Craniofac Surg. 2021;32(2):574-577. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000007026.
2
What Is the Burden of Care of Nasoalveolar Molding?鼻牙槽成型术的护理负担有哪些?
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2020 Sep;57(9):1078-1092. doi: 10.1177/1055665620929224. Epub 2020 Jun 5.
3
Assessing Burden of Care in the Patient With Cleft Lip and Palate: Factors Influencing Completion and Noncompletion of Nasoalveolar Molding.评估唇腭裂患者的护理负担:影响鼻牙槽塑形完成与未完成的因素
护理人员对唇带固定术作为唇腭裂缺陷术前骨科治疗方法的体验。
Children (Basel). 2024 Mar 10;11(3):332. doi: 10.3390/children11030332.
4
Lessons Learned from a Single Institution's Eight Years of Experience with Early Cleft Lip Repair.从单机构八年的早期唇裂修复经验中吸取的教训。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Sep 28;59(10):1741. doi: 10.3390/medicina59101741.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2019 Jul;56(6):759-765. doi: 10.1177/1055665618811526. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
4
Parental experience caring for cleft lip and palate infants with nasoalveolar moulding.父母照顾唇腭裂婴儿并使用鼻牙槽塑形器的经历。
J Adv Nurs. 2016 Oct;72(10):2413-22. doi: 10.1111/jan.12994. Epub 2016 May 4.
5
Caregiver responses to early cleft palate care: A mixed method approach.照顾者对早期腭裂护理的反应:一种混合方法研究
Health Psychol. 2016 May;35(5):474-82. doi: 10.1037/hea0000262. Epub 2015 Aug 17.
6
Comparative Study of Early Secondary Nasal Revisions and Costs in Patients With Clefts Treated With and Without Nasoalveolar Molding.接受和未接受鼻牙槽塑形治疗的腭裂患者早期二次鼻修复及费用的比较研究
J Craniofac Surg. 2015 Jun;26(4):1229-33. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001729.
7
Coping With Cleft: A Conceptual Framework of Caregiver Responses to Nasoalveolar Molding.应对唇腭裂:照顾者对鼻牙槽塑形反应的概念框架
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2015 Nov;52(6):640-50. doi: 10.1597/14-113. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
8
Early cleft management: the case for nasoalveolar molding.早期腭裂管理:鼻牙槽塑形的案例
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Feb;145(2):134-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.11.011.
9
Timeliness of surgical care in children with special health care needs: delayed palate repair for publicly insured and minority children with cleft palate.特殊健康需求儿童的手术护理及时性:公共保险和少数族裔腭裂儿童腭裂修复延迟。
J Pediatr Surg. 2011 Jul;46(7):1319-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.10.002.
10
Nasoalveolar molding: prevalence of cleft centers offering NAM and who seeks it.鼻牙槽塑形:提供鼻牙槽塑形的腭裂治疗中心的患病率及寻求该治疗的人群
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2012 May;49(3):270-5. doi: 10.1597/11-053. Epub 2011 Jul 8.