• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关注他人是否能提升主观幸福感?年龄、动机和关系亲密程度的作用。

Does focusing on others enhance subjective well-being? The role of age, motivation, and relationship closeness.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Basel.

Department of Psychology, University of Zurich.

出版信息

Psychol Aging. 2021 Feb;36(1):69-82. doi: 10.1037/pag0000489.

DOI:10.1037/pag0000489
PMID:33705186
Abstract

Prosociality (i.e., voluntary thoughts and actions intended to benefit somebody else) is arguably essential for positive social relationships. The present research investigated under what conditions a prosocial focus has positive effects on the subjective well-being of a prosocial person. We addressed this question in an intervention study of daily social interactions. All participants (N = 295, 57.6% women, age 19-88 years) started the study with a baseline day with no intervention. Participants then underwent a video-based intervention that trained them to focus on either the well-being of others or the well-being of themselves. Participants applied the corresponding focus in social interactions on the next day. Compared with baseline, focusing on others did not significantly affect subjective well-being, whereas focusing on self significantly reduced subjective well-being (the latter effect was further moderated by age and relationship closeness). The difference between self- and other focus was moderated by age: Younger participants (<36 years) reported lower subjective well-being in the self-focus condition, whereas older adults (>68 years) showed the opposite effect (there was no difference in the middle-aged adults). Taken together, the results suggest that focusing on a social partner increases concerns about the partner's well-being but not necessarily one's own well-being. In contrast, focusing on oneself reduces concerns about the partner's well-being and-particularly for young adults-one's own well-being, rendering a strong focus on oneself a potential risk factor for young adults' well-being. Further research is needed to understand the negative effect of other- versus self-focus on older adults' well-being. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

亲社会行为(即,旨在使他人受益的自愿思想和行动)可以说是积极社会关系的基础。本研究探讨了在什么条件下亲社会关注对亲社会者的主观幸福感产生积极影响。我们在一项日常社会互动的干预研究中解决了这个问题。所有参与者(N=295,女性占 57.6%,年龄 19-88 岁)在没有干预的基础日开始研究。然后,参与者接受了基于视频的干预训练,旨在引导他们关注他人的幸福或自己的幸福。参与者在第二天的社会互动中应用相应的关注点。与基础日相比,关注他人并没有显著影响主观幸福感,而关注自己则显著降低了主观幸福感(后者的影响还受到年龄和关系亲密程度的调节)。自我关注和他人关注之间的差异受到年龄的调节:年轻参与者(<36 岁)在自我关注条件下报告的主观幸福感较低,而老年参与者(>68 岁)则表现出相反的效果(中年参与者没有差异)。总之,结果表明,关注社交伙伴会增加对伙伴幸福的关注,但不一定会增加自己的幸福感。相比之下,关注自己会减少对伙伴幸福的关注,尤其是对年轻成年人而言,也会减少对自己幸福的关注,这使得对自己的强烈关注成为年轻成年人幸福感的一个潜在风险因素。需要进一步研究来了解关注他人和关注自己对老年人幸福感的负面影响。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2021 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Does focusing on others enhance subjective well-being? The role of age, motivation, and relationship closeness.关注他人是否能提升主观幸福感?年龄、动机和关系亲密程度的作用。
Psychol Aging. 2021 Feb;36(1):69-82. doi: 10.1037/pag0000489.
2
Partner-focused obsessions and self-esteem: An experimental investigation.以伴侣为中心的痴迷与自尊:一项实验研究。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2015 Dec;49(Pt B):173-179. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2015.05.007. Epub 2015 May 23.
3
Feeling Appreciated Predicts Prosocial Motivation in Avoidantly Attached Individuals.被欣赏感预测回避型依恋个体的亲社会动机。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2024 Jan;50(1):103-118. doi: 10.1177/01461672221122515. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
4
Perspective taking in older age revisited: a motivational perspective.重新审视老年换位思考:动机视角。
Dev Psychol. 2013 Oct;49(10):1848-58. doi: 10.1037/a0031211. Epub 2012 Dec 31.
5
The role of age and motivation for the experience of social acceptance and rejection.年龄和动机在社会接纳与拒绝体验中的作用。
Dev Psychol. 2014 Jul;50(7):1943-50. doi: 10.1037/a0036979. Epub 2014 May 19.
6
Development and validation of the response to sexual difficulties scale.《性困难反应量表的编制与验证》
Arch Sex Behav. 2013 Jan;42(1):67-79. doi: 10.1007/s10508-012-9973-z. Epub 2012 Jul 11.
7
The effect of pathological narcissism on interpersonal and affective processes in social interactions.病理性自恋对社交互动中人际和情感过程的影响。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2017 Oct;126(7):898-910. doi: 10.1037/abn0000286.
8
How interdependent are stay/leave decisions? On staying in the relationship for the sake of the romantic partner.留/离决策有多相互依赖?为了伴侣而留在关系中。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2018 Nov;115(5):805-824. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000139. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
9
Social reward, punishment, and prosociality in paranoia.偏执中的社会奖励、惩罚和亲社会行为。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2021 Feb;130(2):177-185. doi: 10.1037/abn0000647. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
10
The Manhattan effect: when relationship commitment fails to promote support for partners' interests.曼哈顿效应:当关系承诺未能促进对伴侣利益的支持时。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2014 Apr;106(4):546-70. doi: 10.1037/a0035493.

引用本文的文献

1
The association between quality of life and subjective wellbeing among older adults based on canonical correlation analysis.基于典型相关分析的老年人生活质量与主观幸福感的关系。
Front Public Health. 2023 Sep 19;11:1235276. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1235276. eCollection 2023.
2
Futurization of Aging: Subjective Beliefs and Effects.衰老的未来化:主观信念与影响
Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Dec 21;13(1):4. doi: 10.3390/bs13010004.
3
Experiences of solitude in adulthood and old age: The role of autonomy.成年期和老年期的独处经历:自主性的作用。
Int J Behav Dev. 2022 Nov;46(6):510-519. doi: 10.1177/01650254221117498. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
4
Synergistic Effect of Motivation for the Elderly and Support for Going out.老年人出行动机与出行支持的协同效应
J Pers Med. 2022 Jul 30;12(8):1257. doi: 10.3390/jpm12081257.
5
The Six Components of Social Interactions: Actor, Partner, Relation, Activities, Context, and Evaluation.社会互动的六个组成部分:行动者、伙伴、关系、活动、背景和评价。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 10;12:743074. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.743074. eCollection 2021.