Laboratory of Pharmacogenomics and Individualized Therapy, Department of Pharmacy, School of Health Sciences, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Psychiatric Clinic, Patras General Hospital, Patras, Greece.
Pharmacol Res. 2021 May;167:105538. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2021.105538. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
Undoubtedly, pharmacogenomics (PGx) aims in optimizing drug treatment responses whilst also improving the patients' quality of life, either via a reduction of adverse drug reactions and/or an enhancement of drug treatment efficacy. To achieve this, PGx guidance is provided by the two major regulatory bodies in a worldwide level, specifically the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicine Agency (EMA), and occasionally some research consortia, such as the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) or the Dutch Pharmacogenomics Working Group (DPWG). However, so far, there is a limited number of studies focusing on the delineation of the similarities and more importantly, the discrepancies in the PGx guidance by the different regulatory bodies and consortia. Herein, we use real-life clinical PGx data to highlight such discrepancies and similarities for genome-guided interventions in psychiatric disorders, thus demonstrating the need for harmonization of the guidelines and recommendations. More precisely, we used the PharmCAT genome-informed drug treatment reports from 304 Greek individuals with psychiatric disorders in order to emphasize on the discrepancies in the PGx guidance/guidelines between FDA vs EMA and CPIC vs DPWG, respectively. For example, CYP2D6-pimozide pair is characterized as 'Testing Required' according to FDA and is accompanied by a DPWG PGx guideline, whilst no EMA or CPIC PGx guidance is found for this drug-gene pair. Moreover, discrepancies are observed regarding the type of PGx guidance for CYP2C19-doxepin pair, with 89 individuals from our study cohort requiring a dose prescribing change based on FDA, whilst only 5 individuals have to receive genome-guided treatment adjustment according to CPIC. To our knowledge, this is the first study, in which discrepancies regarding the type of PGx guidance and the number of actionable drug-gene pairs amongst FDA and EMA, as well as CPIC and DPWG, are brought to light with an emphasis on psychiatric disorders.
毫无疑问,药物基因组学(PGx)旨在优化药物治疗反应,同时提高患者的生活质量,无论是通过减少药物不良反应还是提高药物治疗效果。为了实现这一目标,全球范围内的两个主要监管机构——美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)和欧洲药品管理局(EMA),以及偶尔的一些研究联盟,如临床药物基因组学实施联盟(CPIC)或荷兰药物基因组学工作组(DPWG),都会提供 PGx 指导。然而,到目前为止,只有有限的研究关注不同监管机构和联盟的 PGx 指导之间的相似之处,更重要的是差异。在这里,我们使用真实的临床 PGx 数据来突出精神障碍的基因组指导干预中的这些差异和相似之处,从而证明需要协调指南和建议。更确切地说,我们使用了来自 304 名希腊精神障碍患者的 PharmCAT 基因组知情药物治疗报告,以强调 FDA 与 EMA 以及 CPIC 与 DPWG 之间的 PGx 指导/指南之间的差异。例如,根据 FDA,CYP2D6-匹莫齐特对被列为“需要检测”,并附有 DPWG 的 PGx 指南,而对于这个药物-基因对,没有找到 EMA 或 CPIC 的 PGx 指导。此外,CYP2C19-多虑平对的 PGx 指导类型也存在差异,我们研究队列中的 89 个人需要根据 FDA 进行剂量调整,而根据 CPIC,只有 5 个人需要接受基因组指导的治疗调整。据我们所知,这是第一项研究,重点关注精神障碍,揭示了 FDA 和 EMA 以及 CPIC 和 DPWG 之间 PGx 指导的类型和可操作的药物-基因对数量存在差异。