Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, 3168, Australia.
Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, 3168, Australia.
Comput Biol Med. 2021 May;132:104305. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104305. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
Clinical notes are ubiquitous resources offering potential value in optimizing critical care via data mining technologies.
To determine the predictive value of clinical notes as prognostic markers of 1-year all-cause mortality among people with diabetes following critical care.
Mortality of diabetes patients were predicted using three cohorts of clinical text in a critical care database, written by physicians (n = 45253), nurses (159027), and both (n = 204280). Natural language processing was used to pre-process text documents and LASSO-regularized logistic regression models were trained and tested. Confusion matrix metrics of each model were calculated and AUROC estimates between models were compared. All predictive words and corresponding coefficients were extracted. Outcome probability associated with each text document was estimated.
Models built on clinical text of physicians, nurses, and the combined cohort predicted mortality with AUROC of 0.996, 0.893, and 0.922, respectively. Predictive performance of the models significantly differed from one another whereas inter-rater reliability ranged from substantial to almost perfect across them. Number of predictive words with non-zero coefficients were 3994, 8159, and 10579, respectively, in the models of physicians, nurses, and the combined cohort. Physicians' and nursing notes, both individually and when combined, strongly predicted 1-year all-cause mortality among people with diabetes following critical care.
Clinical notes of physicians and nurses are strong and novel prognostic markers of diabetes-associated mortality in critical care, offering potentially generalizable and scalable applications. Clinical text-derived personalized risk estimates of prognostic outcomes such as mortality could be used to optimize patient care.
临床记录是无处不在的资源,通过数据挖掘技术,为优化重症监护提供了潜在价值。
确定临床记录作为重症监护后糖尿病患者 1 年全因死亡率预测指标的预测价值。
使用重症监护数据库中医生(n=45253)、护士(159027)和两者(n=204280)书写的临床文本的三个队列预测糖尿病患者的死亡率。使用自然语言处理对文本文件进行预处理,并训练和测试 LASSO-正则化逻辑回归模型。计算每个模型的混淆矩阵指标,并比较模型之间的 AUROC 估计值。提取所有预测词及其对应的系数。估计每个文本文件的结局概率。
基于医生、护士和联合队列的临床文本构建的模型预测死亡率的 AUROC 分别为 0.996、0.893 和 0.922。模型之间的预测性能差异显著,而它们之间的评分者间信度范围从显著到几乎完美。在医生、护士和联合队列的模型中,具有非零系数的预测词数量分别为 3994、8159 和 10579。医生和护士的临床记录,无论是单独使用还是联合使用,都强烈预测了重症监护后糖尿病患者的 1 年全因死亡率。
医生和护士的临床记录是重症监护中糖尿病相关死亡率的有力且新颖的预后标志物,具有潜在的可推广和可扩展的应用。基于临床文本的预后结局(如死亡率)的个体化风险估计可以用于优化患者护理。