Department of Psychology, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science.
Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
J Pediatr Psychol. 2021 Jun 3;46(5):599-608. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsab009.
To replicate the factor structure of a patient-report measure of provider communication about key medication prescription information, the Communication about Medication by Providers-Adolescent and Young Adult (CAMP-AYA) Version. We evaluated whether the 15-item, two-factor structure identified previously could be replicated via confirmatory factor analysis, and we also examined fit of unidimensional and bifactor models. Associations of CAMP-AYA Total and Factor Scores with provider satisfaction and select patient and medication characteristics were also examined.
Participants were 739 AYA (ages 18-25) who completed the CAMP-AYA, a provider satisfaction rating, and provided demographic and medication information.
The bifactor model was best fitting (χ2 [75] = 689.60, p < .0001; root mean squared error of approximation = 0.11, 90% CI [0.10, 0.11]; Comparative Fit Index = 0.98; Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.98; Standardized Root Mean Square Residual Index = 0.02). Internal consistency reliabilities for Total and Factor Scores were high (αs > .89) and Total and Factor Scores were associated with provider satisfaction (ps < .001). CAMP-AYA scores varied as a function of type of prescription (short vs. long term; new vs. refill), with higher scores reported in the context of long term (>30-day course) or refilled prescriptions (ps < .007) in most cases.
This study provides additional support for the reliability of the CAMP-AYA as a tool to assess AYA perceptions of provider key information coverage about medication prescriptions.
复制一个关于提供者沟通关键药物处方信息的患者报告测量工具的因素结构,即提供者与青少年和年轻人沟通药物的评估-青少年和年轻人版(CAMP-AYA)。我们通过验证性因素分析评估了之前确定的 15 项、两因素结构是否可以复制,我们还检查了单维和双因素模型的拟合度。还检查了 CAMP-AYA 总分和因子得分与提供者满意度以及选择的患者和药物特征的关联。
参与者为 739 名 AYA(18-25 岁),他们完成了 CAMP-AYA、提供者满意度评分,并提供了人口统计学和药物信息。
双因素模型的拟合度最佳(χ2[75]=689.60,p<.0001;近似均方根误差=0.11,90%置信区间[0.10,0.11];比较拟合指数=0.98;塔克-刘易斯指数=0.98;标准化均方根残差指数=0.02)。总分和因子得分的内部一致性信度较高(αs>.89),且总分和因子得分与提供者满意度相关(p<.001)。CAMP-AYA 评分因处方类型(短期与长期;新处方与续方)而异,在大多数情况下,长期(>30 天疗程)或续方(p<.007)的处方报告的评分更高。
这项研究为 CAMP-AYA 作为评估青少年和年轻人对药物处方关键信息覆盖感知的工具的可靠性提供了额外的支持。