Lee Heather, Doody Owen, Hennessy Therese
Mid-West Health Service Executive, Limerick, Ireland.
Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
BMC Nurs. 2021 Mar 11;20(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00554-x.
A lack of safety experienced by patients and staff in acute psychiatric units is a major concern and containment methods used to manage conflict have the potential to cause harm and upset to both staff and patients. To ensure safety for all, it is highly desirable to reduce levels of conflict and containment and the Safewards model is an evidence-based model aimed at reducing conflict and containment rates by improving nurse-patient relationships and safety.
The aim of this study was to explore mental health nurses' experience of the introduction and practice of three Safewards interventions; reassurance, soft words and discharge messages. A qualitative descriptive research design utilising a purposive sample (n = 21) of registered psychiatric nurses (n = 16) and managers (n = 5) in an acute psychiatric unit in Ireland. Following a 12-week implementation of Safewards, three focus groups were conducted, two with nursing staff and one with nurse managers. Data were analysed using Braun and Clarke thematic analysis framework which supported the identification of four themes: introducing Safewards, challenges of Safewards, impact of Safewards and working towards success.
The findings indicate that the process of implementation was inadequate in the training and education of staff, and that poor support from management led to poor staff adherence and acceptance of the Safewards interventions. The reported impact of Safewards on nursing practice and patient experience were mixed. Overall, engagement and implementation under the right conditions are essential for success and while some participants perceived that the interventions already existed in practice, participants agreed Safewards enhanced their communication skills and relationships with patients.
The implementation of Safewards requires effective leadership and support from management, mandatory training for all staff, and the involvement of staff and patients during implementation. Future research should focus on the training and education required for successful implementation of Safewards and explore the impact of Safewards on nursing practice and patient experience.
急性精神科病房中患者和工作人员缺乏安全感是一个主要问题,用于管理冲突的控制方法有可能对工作人员和患者造成伤害并使其不安。为确保所有人的安全,非常有必要降低冲突和控制的程度,而“安全保障”模式是一种基于证据的模式,旨在通过改善护患关系和安全性来降低冲突和控制率。
本研究的目的是探讨心理健康护士对三种“安全保障”干预措施(安抚、温和措辞和出院信息)的引入和实践经验。采用定性描述性研究设计,对爱尔兰一家急性精神科病房的注册精神科护士(n = 16)和管理人员(n = 5)进行了目的性抽样(n = 21)。在实施“安全保障”12周后,进行了三个焦点小组讨论,其中两个是与护理人员进行的,一个是与护士长进行的。使用布劳恩和克拉克主题分析框架对数据进行分析,该框架支持识别四个主题:引入“安全保障”、“安全保障”的挑战、“安全保障”的影响以及为成功而努力。
研究结果表明,在工作人员的培训和教育方面,实施过程存在不足,管理层的支持不力导致工作人员对“安全保障”干预措施的依从性和接受度较差。报告显示,“安全保障”对护理实践和患者体验的影响喜忧参半。总体而言,在合适的条件下参与和实施对于成功至关重要,虽然一些参与者认为这些干预措施在实践中已经存在,但参与者一致认为“安全保障”提高了他们的沟通技巧以及与患者的关系。
“安全保障”的实施需要管理层的有效领导和支持、对所有工作人员的强制性培训,以及在实施过程中工作人员和患者的参与。未来的研究应关注成功实施“安全保障”所需的培训和教育,并探讨“安全保障”对护理实践和患者体验的影响。